Mid Republican Romans

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
Steve63
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:06 am

Mid Republican Romans

Post by Steve63 »

I’ve got myself a MRR army and some questions, the Hastati and Principes are together in a battle group with the Triari behind in support. Yes?
When do the Triari get to fight?
Ordinarily I would have my best units in front, but in this case they are deployed at the back and only fight if the Hastati and Principes flee or are destroyed? Doing a job that could be done by some cheap filler?
I try to play with at least a nod to ancient tactics but in this case it would seem best just to abandon them, as 16 points a base seems a bit much to pay for spectators or am I missing something.
Thanks
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28386
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Mid Republican Romans

Post by rbodleyscott »

Steve63 wrote:I’ve got myself a MRR army and some questions, the Hastati and Principes are together in a battle group with the Triari behind in support. Yes?
When do the Triari get to fight?
Ordinarily I would have my best units in front, but in this case they are deployed at the back and only fight if the Hastati and Principes flee or are destroyed? Doing a job that could be done by some cheap filler?
I try to play with at least a nod to ancient tactics but in this case it would seem best just to abandon them, as 16 points a base seems a bit much to pay for spectators or am I missing something.
Thanks
1) It is historical
2) Cheap filler cannot count as rear support for better quality BGs
3) 1 BG of 2 Triarii can (if placed behind the join between them) support 2 BGs of 4 Hastati/Princpies, which is in fact very cost-effective.
Steve63
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:06 am

Post by Steve63 »

Thank for the reply
But when, if ever do they get to fight?
babyshark
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 1336
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:59 pm
Location: Government; and I'm here to help.

Post by babyshark »

Steve63 wrote:Thank for the reply
But when, if ever do they get to fight?
If you're good, they never need to. :D

Otherwise, they fight either 1) when the BG they are supporting routs and they find themselves suddenly constituting the front line, or 2) if the fight in front of them is going well enough that they can head off to look for a flank to exploit.

Marc
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28386
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

Steve63 wrote:Thank for the reply
But when, if ever do they get to fight?
The goal of battle is to defeat the enemy, not to ensure that everything in your army fights.

Mid-Republican Roman legions were drilled and organised for reliability, not for dash.

Historically, many armies kept their best troops in reserve and hoped they never had to fight. Casualties from veteran units are not as easy to replace as cannon fodder.

The Roman organisation is "belt-and-braces", but sooner or later you will be thankful for it.
broeders
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:37 pm
Location: Wallasey
Contact:

Re: Mid Republican Romans

Post by broeders »

You have to have them - but not necessarily behind the hastati / principes.

I think combining 2 BG's of 2 into one unit of 4 (elite, heavy foot, offensice spearmen, armoured, drilled..) makes them a great unit to anchor your middle.

Put them up against Carthagnian elephants or other offensive spearmen (like the African spearmen) where all those POA's can make a huge difference.
Visit my FOG Ancients blog at http://philbancients.blogspot.com

Visit my Napoleonics blog at http://6mmnapoleonics.blogspot.com
Mehrunes
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:21 pm

Post by Mehrunes »

It's very hard to hold back some of your best fighting troops although it is historical. The MRR list is already one of the most restricted out there due to historical 'correctness' (whatever that is), so I think it is okay to deploy the triarii in some place where they have more impact on the fight.
Having Triarii to fight pursuers of a destroyed H/P-BG seems a bad idea, as these 2-base-BGs are very vulnerable to overlaps. You will soon lose the next 2 AP.

If I have to fight other spearmen/pikemen or mounted, I like to have them IN the front line between the two H/P-BGs.
If you fight other impact foot (especially historical enemies) it may be a good idea to deploy them for rear support, as it is critical not to drop in the impact phase.
You're better in melee anyway, so you have only to 'survive' impact.
pease1
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 7:59 pm
Contact:

Post by pease1 »

Cheap filler? No self-respecting Roman legion would consider rabble behind them as anything other than a nuisance! ....er that and the rules don't allow you to use crap to support quality....

The only problem with the Triarii is you can't buy MORE of them!

If you want something more suited to flanking and pursuing, try the Extraordinarii, or one of the many MRR allies. There's a thread a little lower in this forum where I asked about MRR allies and got a lot of great feedback from the people here. It's worth a read!

[EDIT] - thread is here: viewtopic.php?t=14385
See what I'm painting and playing on my wargaming blog: http://ajs-wargaming.blogspot.com/
marioslaz
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:11 pm
Location: San Lazzaro (BO) Italy

Re: Mid Republican Romans

Post by marioslaz »

broeders wrote:You have to have them - but not necessarily behind the hastati / principes.

I think combining 2 BG's of 2 into one unit of 4 (elite, heavy foot, offensice spearmen, armoured, drilled..) makes them a great unit to anchor your middle.

Put them up against Carthagnian elephants or other offensive spearmen (like the African spearmen) where all those POA's can make a huge difference.
Good point of view. This was an element of Scipio's tactic.
Mario Vitale
Polkovnik
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:16 pm

Re: Mid Republican Romans

Post by Polkovnik »

Steve63 wrote:... it would seem best just to abandon them, as 16 points a base seems a bit much to pay ....
You can't abandon them, as you have to have them in a fixed ratio.
Polkovnik
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:16 pm

Re: Mid Republican Romans

Post by Polkovnik »

Steve63 wrote: the Hastati and Principes are together in a battle group with the Triari behind in support. Yes?
That's the idea but you are free to deploy them and fight with them as you like.
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3079
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

I played against a MRR with my early persians. We routed 2 battlegroups of 4 bases of hastati/principes. This left their supporting 2 base BG of Triarii very isolated facing massed immortals. So the Triarii charged, disrupted the Immortals on impact and broke them in the melee. That's when they get to fight!
Blathergut
Field Marshal - Elefant
Field Marshal - Elefant
Posts: 5882
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada

Post by Blathergut »

I've been running my MRRs as average 4pak Hastati & Principes with superior 2pak Triarii behind when fighting Seleucids. It has worked out very well. Skilled swords get no POAs against anything in that army!! :cry: Plus, a 4pak of average armoured swords comes in at 40pts...8pts under the 8pak pikes it can fight...so for once, Romans have points to put somewhere else!

The +1 for rear support has made the difference quite a few times! And at 26pts, that's awfully cheap rear support that also packs a punch if a hole does open up!

They can be also nimble if they are kept a bit behind the lines (out of 6MU) and a commander handy.
Steve63
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:06 am

Post by Steve63 »

Thanks for all the input guys, some good points raised and definitely some food for thought.
Cheers
Steve
Last edited by Steve63 on Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
marioslaz
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:11 pm
Location: San Lazzaro (BO) Italy

Post by marioslaz »

Blathergut wrote:I've been running my MRRs as average 4pak Hastati & Principes with superior 2pak Triarii behind when fighting Seleucids. It has worked out very well. Skilled swords get no POAs against anything in that army!! :cry: Plus, a 4pak of average armoured swords comes in at 40pts...8pts under the 8pak pikes it can fight...so for once, Romans have points to put somewhere else!

The +1 for rear support has made the difference quite a few times! And at 26pts, that's awfully cheap rear support that also packs a punch if a hole does open up!

They can be also nimble if they are kept a bit behind the lines (out of 6MU) and a commander handy.
This is indeed true, but what if are you facing an army which outnumber your Romans? In a such case, the use of Triarii in BG of 4s for me is recommended to widen your front.
Mario Vitale
Scrumpy
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1423
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:27 pm
Location: NoVa

Post by Scrumpy »

I think the Early Republican Roman army post 340 BC is a much better option. They offer much better supports than the Mid Republicans do, with the option of armoured MF from the Lucanains.
Mehrunes
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:21 pm

Post by Mehrunes »

And that is very sad in some way.

To be honest, I'm very disappointed of the Camillan Roman list.
I understand why they made Hastati and Principes one choice in the MRR (because they fought the same way and had the same equipment) but why the same in the Camillan list, where Principes where armed like the Triarii? I really expected them to be Offensive Spear.
And Rorarii could have been given the sling, to add some variety to the list. It seems these Romans now just distinguish themselves in their allies.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Mehrunes wrote: I understand why they made Hastati and Principes one choice in the MRR (because they fought the same way and had the same equipment) but why the same in the Camillan list, where Principes where armed like the Triarii? I really expected them to be Offensive Spear.

Presumably you would have had separate BGs of Principes and Hastati then?
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
Blathergut
Field Marshal - Elefant
Field Marshal - Elefant
Posts: 5882
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada

Post by Blathergut »

Scrumpy wrote:I think the Early Republican Roman army post 340 BC is a much better option. They offer much better supports than the Mid Republicans do, with the option of armoured MF from the Lucanains.
Haven't seen this yet. Still waiting for the book to be shipped.
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”