Schedule?
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
Schedule?
Maybe is it too soon to ask, but do you have already a time for the release of the rules?
Do you intend to produce them in print? in electronic format for download? both?
I find the description of the rules very interesting, it looks like the game I have been waiting for. I'll watch your site.
Do you intend to produce them in print? in electronic format for download? both?
I find the description of the rules very interesting, it looks like the game I have been waiting for. I'll watch your site.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13558
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 10:19 am
We dont want to set a date yet, because the rules will only get released when they are ready and setting schedules too soon can end up with untested systems being released. We will soon be entering beta testing, but other than that we don't want to commit!
The rules will be print format, as will the army lists.
The rules will be print format, as will the army lists.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13558
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 10:19 am
-
- Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 3:56 pm
- Location: Bournemouth
I suspect that one of the reasons why there have been so many incarnations of DBM is that they were not properly playtested before release. I can only applaud the cautious attitude you are taking towards the release, but would emphasise that when it comes to play testing there is almost no such thing as too many play testers.
regards
Paul
regards
Paul
It always amazes me that people really believe that they can make a game of toy soldiers historically accurate.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13558
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 10:19 am
In some ways we agree, but if you start testing with too many people too soon the volume of feedback becomes too high to manage effectively and the testers feel they are not being appreciated and lose interest. We want to clear up the majority of issues before we open it too wide or we'll get the same problems reported by hundreds of people.
-
- Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
- Posts: 1814
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:09 am
- Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Contact:
iainmcneil wrote:In some ways we agree, but if you start testing with too many people too soon the volume of feedback becomes too high to manage effectively and the testers feel they are not being appreciated and lose interest. We want to clear up the majority of issues before we open it too wide or we'll get the same problems reported by hundreds of people.
Iain, there is wisdom in that observation.
Now, if you could just get that point across to the rest of the industry, please?

-
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 6:12 pm
- Location: Reading, PA, USA
Beta testing
Don't rush it. Too much of the industry conducts "Beta testing" by releasing the game, then creates 2nd editons, 3rd editions, etc. to fix the obvious bugs. What're DBA/DBM up to now?
When the game is opened up for a wider "final" Beta test, I'd like to try it out with the Reading Area Wargamers, in Reading, PA, USA. We've been "rules hunting" for a good "ancients" game for several years with little success. Either they seem to be "fast-play" tournament rules with about as much depth as "paper/rock/scissors" and a bit short on realism, or take more than 4 hours to reach at least some semblance of a decision; there's nothing in the middle.
When the game is opened up for a wider "final" Beta test, I'd like to try it out with the Reading Area Wargamers, in Reading, PA, USA. We've been "rules hunting" for a good "ancients" game for several years with little success. Either they seem to be "fast-play" tournament rules with about as much depth as "paper/rock/scissors" and a bit short on realism, or take more than 4 hours to reach at least some semblance of a decision; there's nothing in the middle.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13558
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 10:19 am
We're currently in closed beta test. The rules are progressing well, as are the lists! The 2nd beta test edition is coming soon, and from then on we hope it will be minor tinkering and rewording only.
After this we have to design the diagrams & produce, set up print layout and take care of all the production, marketing, business related issues.
We can't say for sure how long this will all take, but we're talking a number of months, not years.
After this we have to design the diagrams & produce, set up print layout and take care of all the production, marketing, business related issues.
We can't say for sure how long this will all take, but we're talking a number of months, not years.
-
- Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 3:56 pm
- Location: Bournemouth
To be honest I don't think it will attract many, if any 6th edition players, except maybe to tinker, as they do now with WAB and DBM.
The real target audience is the DBM fraternity, but I may be wrong in this.
By the way I am a stick in the mud 6th edition dinosaur that tinkers with 25mm DBM.
regards
Paul
The real target audience is the DBM fraternity, but I may be wrong in this.
By the way I am a stick in the mud 6th edition dinosaur that tinkers with 25mm DBM.
regards
Paul
It always amazes me that people really believe that they can make a game of toy soldiers historically accurate.