Within the mulitplayer games, how do people feel about the game balance?
I am feeling a persistant - but not super strong - northern bias. That is, the barbarians seem stronger than I expect, and the Carthegenians weaker. In particular, the African infanty compared to the legion.
Also, what is up with Lake Trasemene. This seems much easier for the Romans that it should.
Battle Balance
Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft
-
JocaRamiro
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:19 pm
-
batesmotel
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 3616
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm
The balance between the different types of troops in the PC version is pretty much the same as in the TT rules with the minor difference that on the TT the actual sizes of BGs is an important element in how they compare for effectiveness.
The accuracy and balance of individual scenarios is a different question and also a matter for a amount of subjective judgement. It is difficult to reproduce the actual outcome in the Lake Trasimene scenario. Probably biggest issue there is the absence of a fog of war element so it is easier for the Romans to respond intelligently to the situation without the element of surprise that presumably existed in the historical battle. It might help if the PC version provided some provision for units in ambush as the TT rules do. Of course that would also need to be coupled with allowing non-historical deployment for the Carthaginians to be effective for re-playability of the scenario.
Chris
The accuracy and balance of individual scenarios is a different question and also a matter for a amount of subjective judgement. It is difficult to reproduce the actual outcome in the Lake Trasimene scenario. Probably biggest issue there is the absence of a fog of war element so it is easier for the Romans to respond intelligently to the situation without the element of surprise that presumably existed in the historical battle. It might help if the PC version provided some provision for units in ambush as the TT rules do. Of course that would also need to be coupled with allowing non-historical deployment for the Carthaginians to be effective for re-playability of the scenario.
Chris
In regard to Lake Trasemene, I think perhaps the quality level of the Romans should be reduced some degree to reflect the disorder and confusion caused by them being caught in a line of march and not deployed for battle and taken by surprise, as opposed to their foes who were prepared and psyched for the encounter. Just my humble opinion. 
-
IainMcNeil
- Site Admin

- Posts: 13558
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 10:19 am
-
deadtorius
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5290
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am


