So our agitated Byzantine-ophiles amongst others
The new forum should appear soon - in fact viewforum.php?f=73
On a personal note I am really glad that I have been proved so wrong on this
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators


What I meant was why do you particularly want to field an army from one of the minor Anatolian emirates covered by that DBM list, rather than from one the more successful Anatolian Emirates (Ottomans, Black Sheep Turks, White Sheep Turks)?recharge wrote:Well, I'm not a historical expert on that era; but I had presumed that since DBM/DBA had them separately there was a reason???
John
Or run them together with the Turcoman LH as an Early Ottoman army. The figures ought to be suitable.recharge wrote:Well, as I said; since they were separate in other rules I presumed a significant difference. I already had the lead for making a BBDBA army, just haven't gotten to the painting part yet![]()
So, before I did that, I thought I would see if it was practical to make a FOG army with a little more effort from the BBDBA army![]()
I may take a stab at generating a list; or may just add them to my Turkomans (Turkomen??).
John


The Lombards are in Decline and Fall. There isn't currently a list for that period's Saxons. Somewhat oddly, the Old Saxon list says it stops in the early 6th century, but Carolingian Franks can have allied contingents from it. Normally that sort of thing happens when a people become too small or subjugated to field their own armies, but that doesn't really apply to the Old Saxons.sultangazhir wrote:Is there going to be a Saxon or Lombard army list for Carolingian conqeust era(wolves from the sea) to be discussed.I was thinking of running a campaign for my carolingian army in western germany durring the 780s to 830s era.