LF interpenatration

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
mhohio
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:00 am

LF interpenatration

Post by mhohio »

Had a situation last night where a BG of 6 LF moving through a friendly unit at an angle. All the stands where able to reach the MF but to reach the other side of the MF they would EXCEED the 5 inches plus 2 inch extension. Per MADCAM, the first bullet for interpenatrations is ignored since it is all other cases and the unit will continue thru which was prolly total of 8 - 9 inches and able to fire. Please, could someone explain to me how this is even remotely possible. :shock:
'Happiness lies in conquering one's enemies, in driving them in front of oneself, in taking their property, in savouring their despair, in outraging their wives and daughters.'
Ghengis Khan
marioslaz
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:11 pm
Location: San Lazzaro (BO) Italy

Post by marioslaz »

See the threads about SPACE WARP of some weeks ago (I suppose early october). If your opponent make this move intentionally, you have my special licence to revile him.
Mario Vitale
mhohio
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:00 am

Post by mhohio »

I have no issue with the extra inches the unit will receieve as long as the unit of LF does not fire. So by following the first bullet, the unit of LF would extend there move but not exceed the extra 2 inches. In doing so, the unit is unable to fire. But if the unit warps to hell and back, the LF is able to fire???? Don't the rules also state that use your best judgement???? CMON!~!!!!!!
'Happiness lies in conquering one's enemies, in driving them in front of oneself, in taking their property, in savouring their despair, in outraging their wives and daughters.'
Ghengis Khan
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

Hi Mike - I agree - and I'm sure any umpire would too.

If LF can add 2" and be banned from shooting, then the same LF adding more than 2" should be banned from shooting too.

Anything else is nonsensical.

Pete
Pete
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5290
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

egads that makes perfect sense..... and it didn't even take 101 posts of constant arguments to get there.
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

I think I agree totally with Pete
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Is there not a bit of the rules somewhere that says any BG moving more than it is allowed by inerpenetrating does not get to shoot.

Or did we just make that up in Manchester?
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
shall
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 6137
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:52 am

Post by shall »

If you claim the 2MU bonus you cannot shoot.

Also new FAQ near and will fix the teleportation issue, so any such "fun" will be short-lived anyway.

More soon.

Si
Simon Hall
"May your dice roll 6s (unless ye be poor)"
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5290
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

Lets hope its puts the telporting lights issue to rest at last.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

shall wrote:If you claim the 2MU bonus you cannot shoot.
Si
But that doesn't solve the problem of moving further than normal, though not claiming the 2 MU and then shooting.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
madcam2us
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"

Post by madcam2us »

good! andwhen that FAQ is released such nonsense will cease...

till then and with the RAW, could they (LF) move and shoot fulfilling the second bullet? That is what is the crux...

the first bullet specifically says they can not. the second omits any such language....

Madcam.

(and we both thought it and the space warp cheesy, I just went to the nth degree of cheesy by throwing the fire at the end).
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
madcam2us
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"

Post by madcam2us »

timmy1 wrote:I think I agree totally with Pete

As do I, but that is not the issue. using the RAW, its allowed. (that is, unless one channels the all elusive "intent" clause that doesn't always make it cross the pond :D )

Madcam
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

I thought that the ability to interpenetrate lights and excede your normal move allowance while penetrating difficult terrain was related to the fulfilling of the prophecy: "A black man will be elected president of the United States when elephants fly!" FoG was released to the general public at the beginning of '08. President Obama was elected in the following November. Coincidence? I don't think so.
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5290
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

Sounds like a conspiracy..... especialy with the flying elephants which would cause an additional -1 to your ct if they flew over or within a half base width of one of your units??
Maybe this was an X-files episode, the lights don't really move that far they are just suddenly and mysteriously transported by an alien ship, experimented on and then placed back on the battle field in the wrong place since they don't have any satelites to help the aliens use their GPS
marioslaz
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:11 pm
Location: San Lazzaro (BO) Italy

Post by marioslaz »

deadtorius wrote:Sounds like a conspiracy..... especialy with the flying elephants which would cause an additional -1 to your ct if they flew over or within a half base width of one of your units??
Maybe this was an X-files episode, the lights don't really move that far they are just suddenly and mysteriously transported by an alien ship, experimented on and then placed back on the battle field in the wrong place since they don't have any satelites to help the aliens use their GPS
Why are you so complicated? Conspiracy, alien, X-files... Disney knew the answer since 1941
Mario Vitale
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

marioslaz wrote:Why are you so complicated? Conspiracy, alien, X-files... Disney knew the answer since 1941
Thats because Walt Disney was a Nazi and this was one of his failed experiments.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”