Cv size

Scrumpy · Post by **Scrumpy** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 8:20 am

Which bg would people go for of the following 2 choices...

6 x Cv pro Sup und - la sw or 4 x Cv arm sup und - la sw ?

Cheers

expendablecinc · Post by **expendablecinc** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:02 pm

Scrumpy wrote:Which bg would people go for of the following 2 choices...

6 x Cv pro Sup und - la sw or 4 x Cv arm sup und - la sw ?

Cheers

all other things unknown ... 4 armoured cav

In fact I cant imagine many cases where Id ever take 6 superior cav

spikemesq · Post by **spikemesq** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 2:25 pm

expendablecinc wrote:
Scrumpy wrote:Which bg would people go for of the following 2 choices...

6 x Cv pro Sup und - la sw or 4 x Cv arm sup und - la sw ?

Cheers
all other things unknown ... 4 armoured cav

In fact I cant imagine many cases where Id ever take 6 superior cav

Especially undrilled, since they are harder to maneuver.

Spike

babyshark · Post by **babyshark** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:16 pm

I think that one key question is whether they are likely to face any shooting.

Marc

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:19 pm

babyshark wrote:I think that one key question is whether they are likely to face any shooting.

Marc

But the protected are more likely to face a test and less likely to fail it.

Scrumpy · Post by **Scrumpy** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 8:32 pm

Both units would be superior, I am looking at a Rajput ally for the Ghaznavid list I have been tinkering with. I think I can get 2 Ghilman & 2 Rajput (armoured ) in the army, but would have 6 ally units, a bit excessive for one ally-general to control.

nickandmatt · Post by **nickandmatt** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:36 pm

Fours.
More manouverability.
Cost less, & gives you more BGs (if the list allows)

Cv size

Cv size

Re: Cv size

Re: Cv size