ravenflight wrote:Sergio,
Whilst I sympathise with you feeling a need to rebase, I have to stand up for what I believe. I think that Phil Barker has done the wrong thing in trying to keep things 'the way they were' for too long. His approach has been one of 'don't for the love of mercy change base sizes or the number of figures per base, or even the amount of points a Roman Legionary costs!!!
Yes, it can be frustrating to have your army suddenly not be as good as it was, or a different troop type than it already was. Take a look at the difference between the Ghurid in DBM and FOG. Anyone want to buy some Arabic style archers???
It's a different game, and it might be nice to be able to transport them over from another system, but shouldn't be a mandate.
If you went from Horse and Musket WRG to Napoleon's Battles you had a LOT of change - for example.
Regards
I completely agree.
For example regarding FOGN, I have all my figures based for Napoleon’s Battles and for the moment I’ve decided not to rebase them.
Regarding Chinese and Samurai armies, likely I don’t have to rebase Early Zhou, Warring States, 3 Kingdoms Koreans and Chinese, Western Wei, Yuan.
But unfortunately I don’t have enough MF for Western Han, Song, Ming and Samurai (with bushi) …………….. so I’m a little bit
As Chinese armies are my favourite ones yesterday I’ve started to work with some MF and also LF (I need more LF BG for Early Zhou).
Sergio