Croatian Axemen in Oath of Fealty

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
RobKhan
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 6:52 pm
Location: Hamburg

Croatian Axemen in Oath of Fealty

Post by RobKhan »

I am thoroughly enjoying this book, but I am puzzled why Croat Axemen on top of page 12 are called axemen, but are armed with light spear and sword - did they have very small axes therefore not classed as a heavy weapon??

RobKhan
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Axes wielded in one hand and javelins IIRC, being FoG they fall over if they try and throw the Javs tho.
batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3616
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by batesmotel »

As I recall, the Croatian axemen qualifed as AX(S) in the DBM lists due to having two handed cutting weapons. Does anyone know of any more credibile historical references that might actually describe the weapons used by Croatians during this period? As the owner of a Croatian army from DBM days, inquiring minds want to know.

Chris
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

IIRC the evidence was that they had axes, not that they had two-handed axes. DBM chose to give this the "best" possible interpretation and allow them to be Ax(S). We did not feel that the evidence justified HW in FOG.

Many troops in FOG armed with single handed axes are graded as Swordsmen in FOG.
batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3616
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by batesmotel »

rbodleyscott wrote:IIRC the evidence was that they had axes, not that they had two-handed axes. DBM chose to give this the "best" possible interpretation and allow them to be Ax(S). We did not feel that the evidence justified HW in FOG.

Many troops in FOG armed with single handed axes are graded as Swordsmen in FOG.
Thanks for the response. Do you have any pointers to the evidence? I didn't find anything significant with a quick search on line other than there might be more information in De Administrando Imperio. (Have to dig out my translation of it.) Do you have any other references easily available? (I often run Thracians as light spear, sword, so I'm not necessarily unhappy with the classification although it might have been reasonable to allow the option like it is for the Thracians. I have noticed that the list for the Croatians prior to the union with Hungary do not seem to get an equivalent troop type. Are the axemen only attested serving for the Hungarians?)

Chris
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”