Hello I have rulebooks 1 and 2 but was not convinced. Very interested in starting with FoG, I was prepared to order now the v3 rulebook and checked the forum before...my impression: 3rd rule edition out not a long time ago and already a lot of errata???...Even the errata with errors!!!!!!! Why shoul...

[quote="grahambriggs.I do not think there is a need for a version 2 errata. Yes there are parts that could be clarified but they are very minor. Maybe 2 times in 100 games would a clarification be useful. And for these 2 times we were able to work something out. The people doing all the discuss...

See my post a few days ago - So once more, WHEN will you publish the obviously necessary errata v2 for print out ? Or all those mistakes and unclear wording in the rule book v2, identified in various topics of this Forum, are not worth to be summarized and clarified? Really necessary to have gamers ...

...maybe to summarize mistakes and to clarify unclear wordings/diagrams that are in the rulebook, otherwise we would not have this load of RULE questions with different answers of experts, resulting in topics remaining unclear or inofficial? Why this topic is called "Version 2.0 Errata"......

People here still eager in never ending rule arguing in this Forum? For me as a beginner, I am disappointed that the rule team/Slitherine does not feel the need in publishing the official errata v2 for print out, including some obviously necessary clarifications. Once you decided to distribute the r...

......moving as a column through terrain. Since this is no longer applicable, it no longer matters. Thanks for reply. So a BG of 2 BWg must be long side by long side, each BWg having 1 long base side that cannot shot. Only one deep base is a poor flank protection :( No - you can still be in any for...

dave_r wrote:......moving as a column through terrain. Since this is no longer applicable, it no longer matters.

Thanks for reply. So a BG of 2 BWg must be long side by long side, each BWg having 1 long base side that cannot shot.
Only one deep base is a poor flank protection

Re page 23 Battle group Formation Exception: a battle group of battle wagons never counts as column except when moving along a road. What is the exception referring to? 1) You can never form a column of BG of battle wagons OFF-road? So flank protection is limited to one long base side only. 2) Or it...

On the Rules book v2 back cover it says "the complete rules with clear explanations of how to play". Looking at the many topics in Rules Forum, it does not seem clear, even not to English speaking players, for various reasons as explained above. My understanding of a Rules Forum is that yo...

I think the binding rule answers can only be found in the English Forum. I guess those rule answers in other Forum sections/other languages cannot be considered as official clarifications, they are likely "nice to discuss", correct?

I decided to try FoG AM, so I read with interest some rules questions in the Forum as well. I noticed that if somebody posts a rule question, it is more often followed by opposite replies of, I guess, experienced players or rule team members, see recent example: "Battle wagons CMT for simple mo...

..BUT on Page 43 POINTS TO NOTE ON THE CMT, the definition is: "If a battle Group or battle line Fails its CMT it can make a simple move." There is not an exception like: except artillery and battle wagons. That's why I was asking about this inconsistency and most probably an issue for an ...

When will you create and actualize the v2 errata online, as you did for v1?

p41 says: battle wagons...must pass CMT, whether simple (or complex) move.

It can do anyway a simple move, p43 says: if fails (the CMT), can make a simple move.

So why "whether simple" on p41 ?