Search found 12 matches
- Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:04 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: No POAs for mounted fighting disrupted foot?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5803
funny
Ha ha ha ha ha
- Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:17 am
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: Beijing FoG players?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 829
Beijing FoG players?
I live in Beijing, China and have just started playing FoG. I have been running an informal group of WRG7/Warrior players here for several years and now want to start playing FoG as well so just wondering if there are any other Beijing players out there.
Jonathan
Jonathan
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:47 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: No POAs for mounted fighting disrupted foot?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5803
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:01 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: No POAs for mounted fighting disrupted foot?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5803
Re: Thanks all!
For example, if your opponent in a normal situation would have a +POA, and something happens which negate this POA so you fight at even, it's the same if such situation give you a +POA. Yeah, exactly. That was my original question. Regardless of the mechanism - plus POA for me or minus for you - it...
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:43 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: No POAs for mounted fighting disrupted foot?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5803
Re: Thanks all!
What you likely have not still understood is the level of FOG. In FOG a base is near an unit of other rules (if you compare FOG base that represents near 250 men with WRG 6th edition where a miniature represents 20 men, you see a base in FOG is equivalent to an unit of 12 miniatures of WRG 6th edit...
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:18 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: No POAs for mounted fighting disrupted foot?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5803
Thanks all!
Not bad by definition, just really different from what I'm used to, and what I had assumed was the historical record. But I'm no expert - in fact I rely on these games to tell me how things worked. Anyway, thanks for the help. And if anybody wants to weigh in on the effects of mounted on unsteady fo...
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:33 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: No POAs for mounted fighting disrupted foot?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5803
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:00 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: No POAs for mounted fighting disrupted foot?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5803
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:58 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: No POAs for mounted fighting disrupted foot?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5803
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:50 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: No POAs for mounted fighting disrupted foot?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5803
hmmm
Okay, I think I see that. Basically: 1) unsteadiness takes POAs away from spear guys v. everybody 2) unsteadiness makes MF more likely to fail cohesion tests v. mounted 3) unsteadiness takes away dice from everybody v. all opponents 4) unsteadiness gives all enemy sword guys POAs against you I don't...
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:25 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: No POAs for mounted fighting disrupted foot?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5803
thanks and sorry
. . . and thanks in advance for any help and sorry for the sort of "half rules question half game-mechanic-justification" post. 
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:04 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: No POAs for mounted fighting disrupted foot?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5803
No POAs for mounted fighting disrupted foot?
THE QUESTION Is it true (as it seems to be) that mounted fighting disrupted/fragmented foot get no POAs? If I'm wrong, could somebody point me to the proper spot in the rules? WHY I ASK If mounted really doesn't get an advantages when fighting disrupted or fragged foot that would seem to me totally ...