Hi all
I live in Patras (Greece), my wife though has relatives in Firenze, so I travel there from time to time - where are you situated? I would love to play a couple of games next time I visit your lovely city
Cheers,
Paris

Although having switched to another ruleset concerning the ancient - medieval period, saw the proposed changes in beta section of FOG 3.0 and methinks that they are in the right direction - I 'd be glad to see the same conceptions in the renaissance variant (which I still play) - speed up the game ...

Well done Kostas!

Superb! A great many thanks and greetings from all of us (Hoplon Patras club - Greece)

Thanks alot Blathergut - that settles it all

Hi all

Page 133 - 3rd bullet says Jaegers and Grenzers including all skirmisher attachments must all be in the same mixed division

Page 134 Attachments - Skirmishers Only in a mixed division with no light infantry

Do I get something wrong?

Hi all
Being present during a game betwext my friends PPtheos and Micheni today I had my first opportunity to get familiar to the new ruleset (apart from being a beta tester that does not help much, for I feel we have a different setup from what we faced as testers)- here are my initial impressions ...

Three wrote:

Model wrote:Late 16th century infantry and cavalry would be nice (french wars of religion huguenots and catholics)

Seconded.

Likewise_

"From" it is indeed

Thank you very much for the info

Paris

"Decid al señor duque de Enghien, que agradecemos sus palabras... pero este es un Tercio Español"

Hi all - just a question for you FOGR vets

Building a Later Imperial Spanish list (Flanders after 1635) I wonder if I must choose and use the option

of "other foreign regiments" (1 compulsory battle group) or not - in other words; Any Spanish Imperial

list after 1635 must contain this ...

thanks alot - superb!
Hakkapeliita!

Is the option "Custom game" off or am I doing sth wrong here?
Greetings
Paris

just received the rules - thankx alot - maybe Saturday "le son du canon" will be heard
PiPi

Hi all
seems that the distinction betwex b- testers and the newly announced "categorization" is a brand new policy - personally I doubt that the rules will be given to all candidates for b - testing (thus the careful phrasing I read "to a much wider group" and not to anybody) and I suspect that the ...