Mord wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 4:58 pm Nice work! You guys did a great job. thanks a lot!

Mord.

Thanks, glad you are enjoying it!

Thanks for the update Paul. What you do is great stuff, I strongly appreciate all the work you have put into it.

AI tactics/flow of the game When playing as the CSA the AI needs to have something done to avoid a day 2 pile up in Gettysbury. Currently it ignores most of the objectives in favour of piling on WW1 style at the immediate objectives directly above the town - with human wave attacks preceded by mass...

There are only 2 Persian GARS in the game. I am running 3.1, so maybe my information is already out of date. But I did run a quick hotseat to check on this, and in 3.1 there were 4 Persian gar. I'm glad to hear that the number was reduced. I did a little reading on the subject, and the Persians put...

1.0 Release version is here! Dowload link updated in 1st post of this thread. Very nice. A couple of comments: 1) It is vanishingly unlikely that the Restoration Portuguese would have had anything resembling old-style Early Tercios in 1640-1650. 2) I got a missing string error - I think for IDS_UNI...

1.0 Release version is here! Dowload link updated in 1st post of this threa. Restoration portugese army now available. the english alsop get a separate 1627-28 "English in France" armylist taht includes allied french Huguenot units. We made some research into the Irish and in the end decid...

Well, our new armylists mod (http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=54953) is moving forward. We now added Russians, Tatars, Cossacks, Dutch, TYW English. The enxt installment will include Portugese and Irish armylists. Initially I planned to use these as in the original "Fie...

New version just in time for the weekend. Dowload link in the first post of this thread (updated) Here are the major changes: 1. Zaporozhian Cossack armylist added. 2. Crimea Tatar armylist added. 3. Russian usuprer ("Dimitriad") armylist added. This list has access to polish mercenary uni...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/With_Fire_and_Sword "With Fire and Sword" - classic book by nobel prize winner Henryk Sienkiewicz of "Quo Vadis" fame. It tels the story of several Polish-Lithuanian noblemen and a Cossak leader during the great 1648 Cossack uprising. It is an adventu...

I've played a couple of games now with the AI controlling the Russian side. One thing I've noticed is that the AI seems to select quite a few of the Poorly Armed Levy units. I was wondering if this is historically accurate - genuine question btw as I know nothing about the Russian armies of the per...

jomni wrote:I tried to do paddy.
Water base tile with overlay. But I'm not too familiar with the system and I get weird results (overlay facing and stats)

Maybe try a regular tile texture (not with system water?)

Just played a very bloody battle between the Russians and the Ottomans. Lots of fun! Thank you so much for doing this!!! Thanks for the kind words. New screenshots from the upcoming Dutch army: http://i59.tinypic.com/23ua1jk.png This one is going to be mostly "by the book" and pretty much...

jomni wrote:
New bridge and village skins. But I haven't changed that wall.

Very cool. Might be nice to change the field textures to adry rice paddy? (Wet rice paddy really seems like rough terrain tho).

RELEASE VERSION 1.0 DOWLOAD LINK: http://speedy.sh/4XDhm/EARLY17THCENTURY-1.0.zip Please NOTE: If you had aprevious version, delete the contents of your CAMPAIGNS\EARLY17THCENTURY folder and use the one if the zip below.this is NOT an incremental patch. High priority: Tsardom of Russia - DONE United...

hmmm...what would be the purpose of buying the new module? :? DAG battles and multiplayer. Plus scenario creation (while possible even without the said module - thanks slitherine, I DO appreciate this a whole lot!) is easier if you own the module. All this made me purchase the "Rise of Rome&qu...

Interesting scenario, mostly becayse of the very rough terrain. The large amounts of swamps and the stream running through the middle really managed to channel the fighting. In the end both sides reached their side of the river, but both decided not to try to cross it as the cross-river attack was s...

This is supposed to be a historical scenario, so the balance of power is tilted to the Mongol side (as we think was in history). The map is based on battlefield site research made by mr.Zalewski of "Taktyka i Startegia" military magazine, while the army composition is mostly based on what ...

I don't think they are going to do FOG R. I think they are , i saw it in a review once on the wargamer site . They would make a killing i think if they did. After 2 years of playing FoG , i am still playing 5 to 10 games a week and love it and i think most people who have FoG will buy FoG R. To be ...

BTW I think the crusader army, despite the detailed account of national contingents, is also inflated. It is possible that both armies are somewhat inflated, especailly that period sources often make little or no distinction between combatants and non-combatants in the armies. I still doubt that th...

I am just about at the point of giving up playing the various Ottoman armies with the DAG. They only seem to be able to cope with the Wallachians among their European historical opponents. The provision of fortifications in the DAG list doesn't really help them because these are restricted to the d...