Phil
Search found 7 matches
- Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:50 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Base size of fortified camp ?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1027
- Wed Oct 29, 2008 2:57 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Base size of fortified camp ?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1027
Base size of fortified camp ?
Hi Guys
Am putting together a fortified camp for my 15mm romans. Is it 80 x 120 including fortifications or is it 80 x 120 with a perimeter of fortifications on 15mm deep bases outside the 80 x 120 ?
Thanks
Phil
Am putting together a fortified camp for my 15mm romans. Is it 80 x 120 including fortifications or is it 80 x 120 with a perimeter of fortifications on 15mm deep bases outside the 80 x 120 ?
Thanks
Phil
- Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:11 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Which list for anglo-saxons ?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1191
Which list for anglo-saxons ?
Hi Guys,
I intend to do a matched set of armies, for arthurian england, circa 500ad. This is mainly due to the cornwell books and splintered lights minis. The list from the imperial roman book includes an anglo-saxon list for up to 500ad, mainly heavy foot, impact troops. I will have to wait until ...
I intend to do a matched set of armies, for arthurian england, circa 500ad. This is mainly due to the cornwell books and splintered lights minis. The list from the imperial roman book includes an anglo-saxon list for up to 500ad, mainly heavy foot, impact troops. I will have to wait until ...
- Mon Jan 08, 2007 8:06 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Historically successful armies
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8598
"Well, this is the usual lamentations out of some gamers. IMHO, it is an absolute nonsence" How in gods name can you say that ? That is the typical, condescending snootiness that drives people from wargaming, it isnt " nonsense", its called an opinion. The fact that you dont agree with it doesnt ...
- Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:28 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Historically successful armies
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8598
The problem with wanting to play uneven points games is that is it usually dependant on scenarios, and both players having historically matched armies. This will limit its playablility within clubs and make competition play very difficult. A game where x points of anything can take on x points of ...
- Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:38 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Historically successful armies
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8598
Hi,
my point wasnt that Romans should always beat Gauls, but that equal points armies should have a reasonable chance of beating each other, rather than an uphill struggle for army which was often successful against that same opponent in history. If one side starts at a marked disadvantage given ...
my point wasnt that Romans should always beat Gauls, but that equal points armies should have a reasonable chance of beating each other, rather than an uphill struggle for army which was often successful against that same opponent in history. If one side starts at a marked disadvantage given ...
- Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:48 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Historically successful armies
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8598
Historically successful armies
Hi Guys,
Have read the description of the rules and am definitely interested. However, one peeve I have wit some rule sets ( dbm in particular) is that the claim to be historically accurate, yet armies that won victory after victory, and have made their mark on history suck under their rules ...
Have read the description of the rules and am definitely interested. However, one peeve I have wit some rule sets ( dbm in particular) is that the claim to be historically accurate, yet armies that won victory after victory, and have made their mark on history suck under their rules ...