First Impression of Age of Eagles

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3608
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by batesmotel »

honvedseg wrote:If you look at how the NKE army actually fared against the Assyrians, the Kushites, and other armies of the period, their "lack-lustre" performance in these rules is historically accurate. Those 8 stands of "protected" archers represent the acknowledgement, too little and too late, that sending masses of unarmored levies against armored professional troops wasn't necessarily a good idea.
If you look at the NKE army historically, you might notice that the other opponents such as the Assyrians and the Kushites that you mentioned are ones who existed after the end of the New Kingdom, so I don't see much relevant historical data to be used for a comparison.
IanB3406
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 340
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 6:06 am

Post by IanB3406 »

The interesting thing is if you look at previous lists (DB*) for other rules the Egyptian Bow and infantry where pretty good troops - in fact dominate against the Hittites of the period. I guess that this is not historical? Currently they look to be crushed by some historical opponents, and will be soiling themselves at the site of any Sea People impact foot.

Currently they are garbage to be minimized. Hmm, I do think I will only sabat and not rebase though, you never know in a few years another rule set may give them some life....

Now, thouse Assyrians on the other hand......thoose boys will be coming out! Heck, the Trojan War lists aren't that bad either!
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28284
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

For those that do not consider NKE to be a good bet, rather than leave them in the box, why not morph them into 22nd Dynasty (Libyan) Egyptians?

There is no reason to suppose that 22nd dynasty chariots would not look much the same as NKE ones.
Last edited by rbodleyscott on Tue May 12, 2009 9:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28284
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

IanB3406 wrote:The interesting thing is if you look at previous lists (DB*) for other rules the Egyptian Bow and infantry where pretty good troops - in fact dominate against the Hittites of the period. I guess that this is not historical?
The old interpretation of the Hittite foot as depicted in the Kadesh reliefs is thought to be wrong - see the notes to the Hittite list. The inefficacy of the Hittite foot under previous rules was the result of that (probable) misinterpration. According to the new interpretation they should be classified the same as Egyptian close fighters - hence in DBM they would be Bd(F).

Likewise the old interpretation of the Hittite chariots as HCh is also thought to be wrong.

So if the interpretations currently thought most likely to be correct are used, Hittite troops should be much the same as Egyptians, though with less MF archers.

Unfortunately, for the sake of backwards compatibility with existing armies and for those who continue to believe the old interpretations, we still allow the option for Hittite troops to be classified as per the old interpretations. This does, unfortunately, give rather more scope to tournament minimaxers who may have little interest in the actual history.
IanB3406
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 340
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 6:06 am

Post by IanB3406 »

For those that do not consider NKE to be a good bet, rather than leave them in the box, why not morph them into 22nd Dynasty (Libyan) Egyptians?

There is no reason to suppose that 22nd dynasty chariots would not look much the same as NKE ones.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a much better list in my opinion as well......

What figures to use as the MESHWESH? Could I morph them from the Sea Peoples?

Ian
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Meshwesh were Libyans FWIW.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
honvedseg
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 6:12 pm
Location: Reading, PA, USA

Post by honvedseg »

batesmotel wrote:
honvedseg wrote:If you look at how the NKE army actually fared against the Assyrians, the Kushites, and other armies of the period, their "lack-lustre" performance in these rules is historically accurate. Those 8 stands of "protected" archers represent the acknowledgement, too little and too late, that sending masses of unarmored levies against armored professional troops wasn't necessarily a good idea.
If you look at the NKE army historically, you might notice that the other opponents such as the Assyrians and the Kushites that you mentioned are ones who existed after the end of the New Kingdom, so I don't see much relevant historical data to be used for a comparison.
That's WHY the New Kingdom no longer existed; its military proved no match for the better equipped Libyan, Kushite, and other armies that conquered it in succession. When the Assyrian army invaded it, much later, the "improved" Kushite Egyptian troops were still badly outclassed.
madaxeman
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3002
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:15 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by madaxeman »

rbodleyscott wrote: Unfortunately, for the sake of backwards compatibility with existing armies and for those who continue to believe the old interpretations, we still allow the option for Hittite troops to be classified as per the old interpretations. This does, unfortunately, give rather more scope to tournament minimaxers who may have little interest in the actual history.
Hoorah! So anyone who beats my NKE with Hittites is basically "cheating" 8)

At least that makes me feel a little better :lol:
http://www.madaxeman.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28284
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

madaxeman wrote:
rbodleyscott wrote: Unfortunately, for the sake of backwards compatibility with existing armies and for those who continue to believe the old interpretations, we still allow the option for Hittite troops to be classified as per the old interpretations. This does, unfortunately, give rather more scope to tournament minimaxers who may have little interest in the actual history.
Hoorah! So anyone who beats my NKE with Hittites is basically "cheating" 8)
Tim,

I thought we had already established that anyone who beat you at all was either

a) cheating

or

b) playing in an unsporting manner

or

c) exploiting rules that had been designed with the sole purpose of victimising you.

:wink:
marco
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 658
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:50 pm
Location: saint brieuc

Post by marco »

to support tim :

come in france and play against me : you will be able to add :

you win because :

d) you play better than your opponent



marco tim's fan
la bretagne ça vous gagne...
...mais ça fait pas gagner !

soit on les brûle ,et on venge jeanne,
soit on les defonce à la mitraille et on venge la vielle garde.
christophe artus

http://marcofwar.unblog.fr/
http://marcofwar2.blogspot.fr/
batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3608
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by batesmotel »

honvedseg wrote:
batesmotel wrote:
honvedseg wrote:If you look at how the NKE army actually fared against the Assyrians, the Kushites, and other armies of the period, their "lack-lustre" performance in these rules is historically accurate. Those 8 stands of "protected" archers represent the acknowledgement, too little and too late, that sending masses of unarmored levies against armored professional troops wasn't necessarily a good idea.
If you look at the NKE army historically, you might notice that the other opponents such as the Assyrians and the Kushites that you mentioned are ones who existed after the end of the New Kingdom, so I don't see much relevant historical data to be used for a comparison.
That's WHY the New Kingdom no longer existed; its military proved no match for the better equipped Libyan, Kushite, and other armies that conquered it in succession. When the Assyrian army invaded it, much later, the "improved" Kushite Egyptian troops were still badly outclassed.
The end of the New Kingdon was primarily a matter of a political devolution/collapse of central authority in Egypt rather than being due to military conquest from outside.
madaxeman
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3002
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:15 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by madaxeman »

marco wrote:to support tim :
come in france and play against me : you will be able to add :
you win because :
d) you play better than your opponent
marco tim's fan
Unlikley... however I will be giving playing in Italy a go this summer :)
http://www.madaxeman.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
madaxeman
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3002
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:15 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by madaxeman »

rbodleyscott wrote:
madaxeman wrote:
rbodleyscott wrote: Unfortunately, for the sake of backwards compatibility with existing armies and for those who continue to believe the old interpretations, we still allow the option for Hittite troops to be classified as per the old interpretations. This does, unfortunately, give rather more scope to tournament minimaxers who may have little interest in the actual history.
Hoorah! So anyone who beats my NKE with Hittites is basically "cheating" 8)
Tim,
I thought we had already established that anyone who beat you at all was either
a) cheating
or
b) playing in an unsporting manner
or
c) exploiting rules that had been designed with the sole purpose of victimising you.
:wink:
Well, to paraphrase Churchill, with the Hittites it sounds like all three :wink:
http://www.madaxeman.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
Scrumpy
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1423
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:27 pm
Location: NoVa

Post by Scrumpy »

rbodleyscott wrote:For those that do not consider NKE to be a good bet, rather than leave them in the box, why not morph them into 22nd Dynasty (Libyan) Egyptians?

There is no reason to suppose that 22nd dynasty chariots would not look much the same as NKE ones.
Apart from the go faster stripes & furry dice ? :)
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

marco wrote:to support tim :

come in france and play against me : you will be able to add :

you win because :

d) you play better than your opponent

Not in Tim's case - see Hannibal's comments :D
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
marco
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 658
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:50 pm
Location: saint brieuc

Post by marco »

in france we won't give a visa passport to hannibal, is not eurepean contrary to the englishman tim

but tim prefer to go to italy, a place appreciate by the lybian leader

anyway he didn't go back to his country after a good tournament

and gave up any rule in carthage

marco
la bretagne ça vous gagne...
...mais ça fait pas gagner !

soit on les brûle ,et on venge jeanne,
soit on les defonce à la mitraille et on venge la vielle garde.
christophe artus

http://marcofwar.unblog.fr/
http://marcofwar2.blogspot.fr/
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3857
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

Hoorah! So anyone who beats my NKE with Hittites is basically "cheating"

At least that makes me feel a little better
Interesting. I just wiped the floor with a Hittite army using NKE's.
MadBanker
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:44 pm
Location: Mons (Belgium)

Post by MadBanker »

Another try at the Neo Assyrian list:

4x TC
1x8 HF/MF Av Arm Drilled, 1/2 LS/Sw 1/2 Bow
2x8 MF Av Prot Drilled, 1/2 LS/Sw 1/2 Bow
2x4 Hch Sup Drilled Bow
2x4 Cav Sup Arm Drilled 1/2 Bow/Sw 1/2 LS/Sw
1x4 Cav Elite Arm Drilled LS/Bw*/Sw
1x4 LH Av Unpr Undr Bow
2x6 LF Poor Unpr Undr Bow

11 Bg, 800 pts, +1 initiative

An Assyrian army very similar to this one won the tournament of the Nerviens this year (and crushed my army in the process... though this part is quite easy :lol: )
daleivan
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 373
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Post by daleivan »

Okay, I'm very late to the party on this one, having just picked up Swifter than Eagles Now that the book has been out for a little while does anyone have more to report on how the various armies fare against one another? How do the NKE do against the Sea Peoples and Early Libyans for instance? And which armies do folks folks like from the book for use against other STE armies?

Cheers,

Dale
johno
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:07 pm
Location: Plymouth UK

Post by johno »

I, too, would like to see more people's opinions on the sorts of lists that work for my favourite armies.

I've had mediocre to poor results so far with my NKE, but more success with my Late Dynastic - both with and without heavy chariots - and my one game with the Kushites (against Assyrians, no less) was a draw.

I haven't tried the Old/Middle Kingdom, because I don't have enough stuff on the right sized bases, and I'll need to rebase the Wb(S) before I can try the Libyans.

So, who's got a NKE list they've been successful with? Anyone?

johno
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”