The dustbin
Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft, FoG: Leagues&Tourns&SeekingOpponents Subforums mods
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Division A
rexhurley (persians) by the squeekiest of margins narrowly 39/40 bt Londo (early Byzants) 43/38 in a tight and intense match where we were both trying to get that last vital point.
rexhurley (persians) by the squeekiest of margins narrowly 39/40 bt Londo (early Byzants) 43/38 in a tight and intense match where we were both trying to get that last vital point.
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .


These tables will help you identify which players you still have to play and they will tell you which matches we have received results for (at the time these tables are first posted). Just find your name in the left-hand column and read across the page to see your points won - empty boxes mean that we have not received a result for that match. These charts will also tally with the latest league tables posted in the results thread.
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Yuknoom has won Classical Antiquity C division!
With an excellent record of seven wins and a draw in his nine matches he finishes two points ahead of maulet. Congratulations and well played. 

-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
PeterGuest has won Classical Antiquity D division!
PeterGuest has just edged out IMC by a tiebreaker decision. Both players recorded eight wins and a defeat but Peter won the match with IMC right back at the beginning of the season to take the top spot. Congratulations. 

Re: Themed event: winner post your result here . . .
QF Results
Praeter, Normans, 15/39 beat tullius, Ango-Normans, 41/39
tullius, Normans, 35/39 beat Praeter, Anglo-Normans, 41/39
Praeter, Normans, 15/39 beat tullius, Ango-Normans, 41/39
tullius, Normans, 35/39 beat Praeter, Anglo-Normans, 41/39
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Div C
Praeter, English (18/28) beat tullius, Serbians, 38/33
Praeter, English (18/28) beat tullius, Serbians, 38/33
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Later Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .


These tables will help you identify which players you still have to play and they will tell you which matches we have received results for (at the time these tables are first posted). Just find your name in the left-hand column and read across the page to see your points won - empty boxes mean that we have not received a result for that match. These charts will also tally with the latest league tables posted in the results thread.
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .


These tables will help you identify which players you still have to play and they will tell you which matches we have received results for (at the time these tables are first posted). Just find your name in the left-hand column and read across the page to see your points won - empty boxes mean that we have not received a result for that match. These charts will also tally with the latest league tables posted in the results thread.
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .


These tables will help you identify which players you still have to play and they will tell you which matches we have received results for (at the time these tables are first posted). Just find your name in the left-hand column and read across the page to see your points won - empty boxes mean that we have not received a result for that match. These charts will also tally with the latest league tables posted in the results thread.
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:46 pm
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Division C
MikeMarchant's Byzantines (15/34) beat zumHeuriger's Avars (18/18)
A tough and close battle where the numbers really counted. The Avars fielded superior quality troops but were badly outnumbered and struggled to bring their superiority to bear. A closer battle than the result might suggest and I was greatly relieved at the end when I saw that I'd won (I'd won before I'd even realised).
Thanks for the game, zumHeuriger, I really enjoyed it.
And thanks to everyone for all the games. Win, lose or draw (although there weren't any draws) I enjoyed every battle in this division, and in all of the other divisions I played in this round. This was my last, until next time, hopefully soon.
Best Wishes
Mike
MikeMarchant's Byzantines (15/34) beat zumHeuriger's Avars (18/18)
A tough and close battle where the numbers really counted. The Avars fielded superior quality troops but were badly outnumbered and struggled to bring their superiority to bear. A closer battle than the result might suggest and I was greatly relieved at the end when I saw that I'd won (I'd won before I'd even realised).
Thanks for the game, zumHeuriger, I really enjoyed it.
And thanks to everyone for all the games. Win, lose or draw (although there weren't any draws) I enjoyed every battle in this division, and in all of the other divisions I played in this round. This was my last, until next time, hopefully soon.
Best Wishes
Mike
Re: Classical Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Div D
mcfcivo pyrrhic 28/37 defeated mchargmg roman 38/35
Great game, I got lucky with Roman routs disordering units behind,
cheers,
Andy.
mcfcivo pyrrhic 28/37 defeated mchargmg roman 38/35
Great game, I got lucky with Roman routs disordering units behind,
cheers,
Andy.
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Division C result
tofman04 (African Vandal, later 500-534 AD) 6/21 beat zumHeuriger (Avar, later) 25/21
tofman04 (African Vandal, later 500-534 AD) 6/21 beat zumHeuriger (Avar, later) 25/21
Re: Themed event: winner post your result here . . .
QF Result
lydianed (Normans) 28/39 vs tofman04 (Anglo-Normans) 39/39
lydianed (Anglo-Normans) 39/39 vs tofman04 (Normans) 39/39
lydianed (Normans) 28/39 vs tofman04 (Anglo-Normans) 39/39
lydianed (Anglo-Normans) 39/39 vs tofman04 (Normans) 39/39
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 767
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 12:47 am
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
div A
Londo....pw londo
Londo....pw londo
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Div A
Londo (Later Serbian) 18/46 beat Cunningcairn (Crown of Aragon) 35/35
Londo (Later Serbian) 18/46 beat Cunningcairn (Crown of Aragon) 35/35
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:12 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Re: Later Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Div A
Jonathan4290 (Picts) 35/50 defeats Batesmotel (Romans) 37/35
Jonathan4290 (Picts) 35/50 defeats Batesmotel (Romans) 37/35
Check out my website, The Art of Battle: Animated Battle Maps, where I recreate the greatest battles and campaigns of history: http://www.theartofbattle.com
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
DIV C
Epos (Later Teutonic) – (21/27) > beat < zumHeuriger (Medieval French) – (33/33)
Epos (Later Teutonic) – (21/27) > beat < zumHeuriger (Medieval French) – (33/33)
-
- Sergeant - Panzer IIC
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:30 pm
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Division C
Peterabb (Lombard, later 776-1077AD) 24/28 defeated zumHeuriger (Avar, later) 21/20
Another very tough battle.
Peterabb (Lombard, later 776-1077AD) 24/28 defeated zumHeuriger (Avar, later) 21/20
Another very tough battle.
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Div A
lydianed (Lombard) 34/40 vs tullius (Arab Conquest) 41/38
Thanks for the game. That's it for this division for me. Cheers to all.
lydianed (Lombard) 34/40 vs tullius (Arab Conquest) 41/38
Thanks for the game. That's it for this division for me. Cheers to all.
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Div. B
Epicouros (Early North African Fatimids) 32/33 beat gazxtrix (Lombards) 46/46 by the narrowest of margins.
Could (should?) have been a draw: both armies destroyed each other's left flanks, and mutually in the centre. In the last few turns, it came down on dice rolls, really. A bloody affair.
Epicouros (Early North African Fatimids) 32/33 beat gazxtrix (Lombards) 46/46 by the narrowest of margins.
Could (should?) have been a draw: both armies destroyed each other's left flanks, and mutually in the centre. In the last few turns, it came down on dice rolls, really. A bloody affair.