The delay in v2 rules affects decision to acquire new armies

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3079
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Re: Re:

Post by grahambriggs »

ravenflight wrote:
Jilu wrote:hmmm why the range reducing? are LH troopers less able to shoot? are their bows of lesser quality? are troops that have LH or Cv options not the same and so able to shoot ate- same distances?
Well, there are a couple of reasons I can see, althought I'm not a writer so can't comment on their decisions.

1 - it's harder (much harder) to draw a bow from a saddle than standing on the ground; and,
2 - it's more accurate to be closer, so why would you shoot from a long way away when you can get close and be 'almost' as safe? It's one of the things I DO agree with dBm/dBa about.
It's to stop LH bow being so good as they are in v1 without changing points. And single rank cavalry bow as they're meant to be similar troops (and at least some or the v2 suggestions were to allow the cavalry to fall back). i.e. it's a game mechanism
david53
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: The delay in v2 rules affects decision to acquire new ar

Post by david53 »

Is the fall back for cavalry still in i thought that had been dropped cause it caused the end of the world
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”