Knockout Tournament
Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft
Result of the match between me and Ianiow
ianiow - Bosporan (Mid) 60/59 vs Yann - Parthian 35/38
So I report a victory for myself. The game was a very close one with a kind opponent.
I will be in holidays after 11th July. So I propose to qualify my opponent Ianiow for the next turn. Please contact him if this solution would be the best for you.
Best regards
Yann
ianiow - Bosporan (Mid) 60/59 vs Yann - Parthian 35/38
So I report a victory for myself. The game was a very close one with a kind opponent.
I will be in holidays after 11th July. So I propose to qualify my opponent Ianiow for the next turn. Please contact him if this solution would be the best for you.
Best regards
Yann
Thanks Yann, I've decided the fairest way to find a replacement is to give the first option to ianiow as he caused the highest percentage BP loss to his first round opponent, if ianiow can't play the next round I'll offer the place to the next highest and so on. I'll get the next round put up as soon as this is resolved.
cheers
Matt
cheers
Matt
Ok, ianiow has agreed to take Yann's place in the next round and will use Yann's winning Parthian list option.
Same rules as the first round please, 500pt armies, first person in each tie to submit the challenge and PM their opponent with the password, FOW and double move to be enabled. Winner of tie 1 will play the winner of tie 2 within each group. Current deadline for the second round matches to be completed is 20/07.
Group A
1) Robert241167 - Later Macedonian vs iversonjm - Bosporan (Mid)
2) pantherboy - Later Jewish (Hyrcanus II) vs davouthojo - Late Republican Roman (Brutus and Cassius)
Group B
1) batesmotel - Bosporan (Mid) vs Deeter - Later Seleucid (Pre 166BC)
2) Morbio - Later Seleucid (Post 166BC) vs ianiow - Parthian
Any errors or queries please let me know.
cheers
Matt
Same rules as the first round please, 500pt armies, first person in each tie to submit the challenge and PM their opponent with the password, FOW and double move to be enabled. Winner of tie 1 will play the winner of tie 2 within each group. Current deadline for the second round matches to be completed is 20/07.
Group A
1) Robert241167 - Later Macedonian vs iversonjm - Bosporan (Mid)
2) pantherboy - Later Jewish (Hyrcanus II) vs davouthojo - Late Republican Roman (Brutus and Cassius)
Group B
1) batesmotel - Bosporan (Mid) vs Deeter - Later Seleucid (Pre 166BC)
2) Morbio - Later Seleucid (Post 166BC) vs ianiow - Parthian
Any errors or queries please let me know.
cheers
Matt
As the first knockout tourney appears to be going well I was considering firing up a second one, maybe SoA? Would anyone be interested in this? What about having to submit an army list and not allowing any changes to be made to it from round to round, would this be preferable to the current option to make changes as desired between rounds?
cheers
Matt
cheers
Matt
-
- Field Marshal - Me 410A
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
I would like to throw in for an SOA tourneyandersm73 wrote:As the first knockout tourney appears to be going well I was considering firing up a second one, maybe SoA? Would anyone be interested in this? What about having to submit an army list and not allowing any changes to be made to it from round to round, would this be preferable to the current option to make changes as desired between rounds?
cheers
Matt
As for submitting a list to be used for all battles? Seems like a lot of work(at least for you

Would your opponent(s) be able to see the lists of all other players? That would be a lot of info to disseminate
-
- Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:40 pm
- Location: Wokingham, UK
I won't be playing SoA, I don't have it.andersm73 wrote:As the first knockout tourney appears to be going well I was considering firing up a second one, maybe SoA? Would anyone be interested in this? What about having to submit an army list and not allowing any changes to be made to it from round to round, would this be preferable to the current option to make changes as desired between rounds?
cheers
Matt
Personally, I like the idea of being able to tailor an army to face an opponent, however I wouldn't be averse to staying with one army throughout.
Hi GrayMouser
Good to hear you are interested in an SoA tourney. Yes compiling lists would be a fair bit of work but I'd be happy to do so if it made for a better tourney for the players. If used I'd get players to submit a list to me, then after the 1st round draw would post the lists to the forum page, would be up to players to be honest and stick to the designated list but I don't think this would be an issue... Added bonus would be newer players would get to see how experienced players are compiling their lists which may give them some good pointers... It's only an idea though and I'm happy to stick to the original way if it proves contentious.
cheers
Matt
Good to hear you are interested in an SoA tourney. Yes compiling lists would be a fair bit of work but I'd be happy to do so if it made for a better tourney for the players. If used I'd get players to submit a list to me, then after the 1st round draw would post the lists to the forum page, would be up to players to be honest and stick to the designated list but I don't think this would be an issue... Added bonus would be newer players would get to see how experienced players are compiling their lists which may give them some good pointers... It's only an idea though and I'm happy to stick to the original way if it proves contentious.
cheers
Matt
-
- Field Marshal - Me 410A
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
-
- Tournament 3rd Place
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:30 pm
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5882
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
- Field Marshal - Me 410A
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5882
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Me thinketh not...since they were oftimes at war with them...ummm...and didn't they end up killing the Burgundian dude???TheGrayMouser wrote:Dont ordnance get access to a couple?Blathergut wrote:Oh..am good for a SoA go. Ordonnance Burgundian (At least one person won't be chumming up to those dang Swiss pikes!)
Oh...on another note...why do the Germans get 6 free BGs at no cost??
-
- Field Marshal - Me 410A
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
Hmm one of the Burgundian lists does get a couple of Swiss pikes(not as an ally either)Blathergut wrote:Me thinketh not...since they were oftimes at war with them...ummm...and didn't they end up killing the Burgundian dude???TheGrayMouser wrote:Dont ordnance get access to a couple?Blathergut wrote:Oh..am good for a SoA go. Ordonnance Burgundian (At least one person won't be chumming up to those dang Swiss pikes!)
Oh...on another note...why do the Germans get 6 free BGs at no cost??
Since they were mercenaries anyone theoreticlly get them if they had the dough....
Charles the Bold was the dude that has his head staived in by a Swiss poleaxe, he didnt have any Swiss as he was at war with them!
I dont know what you mean about 6 free units? Never noticed that will check it but I use the list a lot... Which units? Maybe something get messed up in the new pacth?
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5882
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada