TDC - Archive

[Garokan]

Div C

Garokan Roman 379 + Germanic horse tribes defeated Badger73 Roman 197-284 AD with Armenian 331BC-252AD 61-57
Score: 64-57

A very even and superb match!

Good luck!

[Dreddradish]

Division A

Dreddradish Anglo-Saxon 600-870 AD defeated ericdoman1 Khorasanian with Ghaznavid 962 - 1187 AD allies 48:21

In a terrain constricted battlefield the early successes of the Khorasanian veteran Dailami foot were overwhelmed by the Anglo-Saxon defense in depth.

[Badger73]

Division D

Badger73 (Lysimachid 320-281 BC with Seleucid allies) defeats Tomoegozen (Egyptian 570 - 525 BC with Kyrenean Greek 630 - 461 BC allies) 54-29

A patch of rugged terrain in the center protected the Lysimachid pike flanks. Lysimiachid medium foot could use it to prevent their pikes from being surrounded by more mobile Egyptians and Greeks spear units. It wound up a back-and-forth battle with opposite flanks collapsing where more fragmented Lysimachid units rallied than Egyptian ones. Thanks for an exciting game.

[Stew101]

Division A challenges.

Stew101 - Spanish 821 - 1049, with Andalusian allies 756 - 1049, challenges:

Tabai - German (North/West) 1050-1154 AD with Polish 1058-1154 AD allies
&
CWS - Berber Murabit 1087 - 1147.

Hi the games are set up ready in Medieval FOG.

PW is Madrid.

PM sent.

[Stew101]

I dont seem to be able to send a PM to CWS in Division A.

Is that name correct in the division listing?

Stew.

[Delbruck]

Division A

delbruck (Daylamis) defeated desertedfox (Anglo Saxon) 31-7 (desertedfox surrendered).

The Anglo Saxon army was positioned between woods on both flanks. The more mobile Daylamis army was able to maneuver onto the flanks, making the Anglo Saxon position impossible to defend.

Thanxs for the game.

[iversonjm]

Div C Challenge for DirtyMark

Byzantine Italy (1038-39) v. Danish & German Allies

PW=DivC

[ericdoman1]

Division A

delbruck (Daylamis) defeated desertedfox (Anglo Saxon) 31-7 (desertedfox surrendered).

The Anglo Saxon army was positioned between woods on both flanks. The more mobile Daylamis army was able to maneuver onto the flanks, making the Anglo Saxon position impossible to defend.

Thanxs for the game.

Based on the added part to Adjudications the score will be

delbruck (Daylamis) defeated desertedfox (Anglo Saxon) 40 -7 (desertedfox surrendered). - (93-7)

We should all Stand With Ukraine.

[nyczar]

Division B

nyczar - Macedonia 320-261BC with Greek Allies challenges

Delbruck - Ptolemaic (55-30 BC) with Roman (105-25 BC) allies
Holien - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC w/Numidian
SpeedyCM - Pyrrhic 280-275 with Samnite allies


PW is rubicon

[Badger73]

Div C

Garokan Roman 379 + Germanic horse tribes defeated Badger73 Roman 197-284 AD with Armenian 331BC-252AD 61-57
Score: 64-57

A very even and superb match!

Good luck!

A superb match indeed. However, shouldn't "Score:" be "61-57" instead of "64-57"?

[ericdoman1]

Div C

Garokan Roman 379 + Germanic horse tribes defeated Badger73 Roman 197-284 AD with Armenian 331BC-252AD 61-57
Score: 64-57

A very even and superb match!

Good luck!

A superb match indeed. However, shouldn't "Score:" be "61-57" instead of "64-57"?

Hi Gents

Garokan is correct. It is an outright victory. So you add 60 to the difference between scores. The difference between 61 - 57 is a 4 + 60 = 64 - 57

We should all Stand With Ukraine.

[ericdoman1]

Division A

eric Khorasanian with Ghaznavid 962 - 1187 AD allies defeated markleslie Viking (Ireland) 900-1049 AD with Scots allies - 45 - 11 (94-11)

Cheers Mark

We should all Stand With Ukraine.

[Dreddradish]

Division A

Dreddradish Anglo-Saxon 600-870 AD defeated desertedfox Anglo Saxon 950 - 1016 allies Viking 900 - 1049 AD 62:33

The viking huscarls fought to the last in a grueling slugfest.

[anderarcos11]

Division E

Anderarcos11 (Pyrrhic 280-275BC) defeated mcfcivo (Macedonian 328-321BC) 41 13

Scoring 88 to 13

[anderarcos11]

Division E

Anderarcos11 (Pyrrhic 280-275BC) defeated mcfcivo (Macedonian 328-321BC) 41 13

Scoring 88 to 13

[anderarcos11]

Division E

Anderarcos11 (Pyrrhic 280-275BC) defeated mcfcivo (Macedonian 328-321BC) 41 13

Scoring (absolute victory) is 88 to 13.

<Geffalrus Edit: looks like this is a double post, so let me figure out how to delete this and clean up the thread. Congrats on your third straight win, Anderarcos11!!>

[carpenkm]

I dont seem to be able to send a PM to CWS in Division A.

Is that name correct in the division listing?

Stew.

Sorry Stew - It's Captainwaltersavage

I was being lazy and I thought everyone knew him!!!!

i've updated the divisional listing

[rth]

Hallo
sorry ich bin ein bisschen doof und verstehe das meiste hier von der Organisation nicht.

Ich glaube ich bin der Division C zugeteilt
und muss gegen jeden dieser Spieler spielen,
mit nicht festgelegter Reihenfolge.

Gibt es eine tabellarische Auflistung der Spieler der Division C ?
wenn ja wo ?

Ich habe mir selber eine erstellt mit 9 Spielern:

Bagatrix 1805 - Karthago Han in Italien 216-203 v. Chr. mit bruttianischen und lukanischen Verbündeten

random27 – Assyrer 681–609 v. Chr. mit ägyptischen Verbündeten

IMC – Römer 105–25 v. Chr. mit numidischen oder maurischen Verbündeten von 55 v. Chr. bis 6
n. Chr.

lunecastle – Ptolemäer 55–30 v

Murten - Lyder 550-546 v. Chr. mit griechischen Verbündeten

DocVanNos - Parther 250 v. Chr. - 250 n. Chr. mit Seleukiden 166-125 v. Chr. Verbündete

rth - Gallier 300 - 100 v. Chr. mit spanischen Verbündeten

tmac - Römer 280 - 220 v. Chr. mit griechischen (westlichen) Verbündeten

Deeter - Mazedonien 320 - 261 v

habe aber auch eine Herausforderung IMC gegen Lynx57 in der Division C gesehen.

Wo kommt der her, gehört Lynx57 auch zu Division C ?

aktuell habe ich eine Herausforderung bekommen von Bagatrix 1805 und sie angenommen.

ich werde heute 2 eigene Herausforderungen erstellen und verschicken.

Sorry für die zusätzliche Arbeit die ich eventuell mit einer erklärenden Antwort bereite.

Mit sportlichen Grüßen
rth (Ralf)

Ps: ich versende die Nachricht 2 mal , einmal hier in deutsch mit sicherlich automatischer Übersetzung
und ein weiteres mal versuche ich es selbst über google Übersetzung in englisch
mein eigenes englisch ist sehr schlecht

[tyronec]

Div A

tyronec - Italian (Ghibelline) 1200-1319 AD w/Sicilian 1200-1266 AD ally challenges desertedfox - Mamluk Egyptian 1250-1339 AD
tyronec - Italian (Ghibelline) 1200-1319 AD w/Sicilian 1200-1266 AD ally challenges oscarius - French 1155 - 1319 with Aragonese 1200-1274 ally
tyronec - Italian (Ghibelline) 1200-1319 AD w/Sicilian 1200-1266 AD ally challenges Lennard - Armenian (Cilicia) 1155-1375 AD with Mongol (Illkhanid) 1230-1353 AD ally

pw - Ottone

[vakarr]

Division D

vakarr (Thracian (Getae) 279 BC - 46 AD with Triballi (350 BC - 46 AD) ) defeated anderarcos11 Parthian 250 BC -225 AD
Scores were Thracians 13 and Parthians 41

A tough battle where the Thracians had nothing that was really better than the cataphracts. However, there were some hills, rough terrain, and large woods on the Parthian side of the battlefield. It was a surprise to see the Parthians field so many raw Thureophoroi. The Thracians decided to have a strong left flank and a refused right flank, and the Parthians matched this - there was a huge amount of Parthian cavalry on the Thracian right flank, but it had to get out of the woods and it had nothing to fight against. Meanwhile, the Thracians were able to box in the cataphracts on the other side, and the cataphracts in the woods hardly got out before they were hit and thrown back in again. The cataphracts did break through the Thracian lines but were held long enough for the thureophori and light troops to be taken out, plus the other cataphracts in, or close to, the woods. Two stand out moments:
1. The caraphracts charged a light infantry bow unit, only to find that it stood to receive the charge and was on rough ground - and won the combat (doing very little damage)
2. Thracian medium spears charged a raw thureophoroi unit. Both units had not been in combat before or received any damage. The Thracians had the advantage, being average morale. The Thracians instantly became fragmented.
It was scary to see how many cataphracts and heavy cavalry were in that army - the Parthian left flank alone had the same number as the maximum heavy cavalry in the entire Thracian army. Huge fire power, but the game was ended before it could be brought to bear.