Thanks Ericericdoman1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 5:39 pmHi Mike
You cannot have Papal allies but you can have Neapolitan and they are identical.
Cheers
Eric
Neapolitan 1443-1500 allies it is - edited on my post too.
Moderators: kronenblatt, ericdoman1, carpenkm, harveylh, Karvon, Geffalrus, Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
Thanks Ericericdoman1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 5:39 pmHi Mike
You cannot have Papal allies but you can have Neapolitan and they are identical.
Cheers
Eric
You are more than welcome.
No problemangusosborne wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 6:21 pm I would like to have allies with my first choice, Is that OK?
1) Mongol (Ilkhanid) 1230-1353 AD with Armenian (Cicilia) allies 1155-1375
2) Sicilian 1200-1266 AD
3) Neapolitan 1267-1300
Yes, Armenian allies will be fineangusosborne wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 6:21 pm I would like to have allies with my first choice, Is that OK?
1) Mongol (Ilkhanid) 1230-1353 AD with Armenian (Cicilia) allies 1155-1375
2) Sicilian 1200-1266 AD
3) Neapolitan 1267-1300
Correct on all countsray552 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 11:53 pm Just to clarify the map choice rules:
1. Either player can unilaterally reject the first map - no need to get permission from the other player?
2. If the first map is rejected, the second map may be accepted or rejected by the player who did not reject the first map?
3. If the first two maps are rejected by both players, the third map *must* be used?
B.If the first map is rejected, the second map may be accepted or rejected by the player who did not reject the first map?
A Would indicate the player who rejected the first map cannot reject the second map.If both players do not agree on the map on the first two rolls