Special league Tournament

Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft

Ironclad
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1471
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:57 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by Ironclad »

allendeuce wrote:I am now lsting challenges for:
Nakedcelt pw = naked
Ironclad pw = iron
Sir Lancelot pw = lance
We seem fated - iron not accepted as pw.
Ironclad
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1471
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:57 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by Ironclad »

epos wrote:Challenges to :

emilianojimenez - Early Catalan ------ pw: epos3
Ironclad Principate Roman ------------ pw: epos4
Challenge accepted - your fate awaits you.
paulmcneil
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 778
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:07 pm
Location: Hamble, UK
Contact:

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by paulmcneil »

paulmcneil Parhians 6/47 beat Nakedcelt Romans 36/35
Paul McNeil
Edmund_Blackadder
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:31 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by Edmund_Blackadder »

Edmund_Blackadder's Bactrians 23/47 49% beat MikeMerchant's Gepids 47/41 100%
Thanks, as always, for the game Mike. Facing an uphill struggle against better armour and better dice and with almost no help from their Gothic ally, the Gepids nearly broke through with a bold mass charge, but those nice little cubes prevented it.

Challenge for neibanlucky still waiting with password neiban.
Edmund_Blackadder
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:31 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by Edmund_Blackadder »

Two more open challenges up - password 'Bactria'. By my reckoning I have played or am playing everyone except:
klayeckles, payalag, emilianojimenez, epos, Nakedcelt & Sirlancealot

Please feel free to accept. To keep it simple, I'm using the same army against all.
notjustdon
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 5:12 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by notjustdon »

Well you are only meant to be using one army anyway. payalag has not played any games and emilianojimenez seems to have stopped playing as no results seem to be coming up since the first few games. I'm still waiting for him to start against me.
IMC
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by IMC »

Against the odds.....IMC's Seleucids 32/54 beat Cunningcairns Sarmations 46/45

A marathon over twenty turns. One of the best games I have ever played. Somehow the pikes managed to stop the cavalry encircling them and presented few rears whilst they advanced and cut off the cavalry retreats until the very last rounds. Thanks Martin!!

I'll pick up any outstanding challenges tonight.

Ian
Edmund_Blackadder
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:31 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by Edmund_Blackadder »

notjustdon wrote:Well you are only meant to be using one army anyway. payalag has not played any games and emilianojimenez seems to have stopped playing as no results seem to be coming up since the first few games. I'm still waiting for him to start against me.
Not sure if I've missed something as it's my first forum competition. I meant that I have been using literally the same units in every battle without making changes. I was under the impression others were changing the units within the same list according to which opponent they are playing. Is this wrong?
allendeuce
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:56 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by allendeuce »

Allendeuce's Bosporans defeat Neibanlucky's Galatians, Bospoe's 20/47 (43%) to Galatians 54/54 (100%).
Game started scarey, but turned for the Bosporans in time.
Thanks, Neibanlucky!
MikeMarchant
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 788
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:46 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by MikeMarchant »

Edmund_Blackadder wrote:Edmund_Blackadder's Bactrians 23/47 49% beat MikeMerchant's Gepids 47/41 100%
Thanks, as always, for the game Mike. Facing an uphill struggle against better armour and better dice and with almost no help from their Gothic ally, the Gepids nearly broke through with a bold mass charge, but those nice little cubes prevented it.

Challenge for neibanlucky still waiting with password neiban.
A well played game, Richard. A tough army for the Gepids to face, but also one that was very well deployed and manoeuvred.

A well deserved victory. Thanks for the game.


Best Wishes

Mike
MikeMarchant
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 788
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:46 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by MikeMarchant »

Edmund_Blackadder wrote:
notjustdon wrote:Well you are only meant to be using one army anyway. payalag has not played any games and emilianojimenez seems to have stopped playing as no results seem to be coming up since the first few games. I'm still waiting for him to start against me.
Not sure if I've missed something as it's my first forum competition. I meant that I have been using literally the same units in every battle without making changes. I was under the impression others were changing the units within the same list according to which opponent they are playing. Is this wrong?
I've used exactly the same units in every battle too.


Best Wishes

Mike
epos
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 273
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:45 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by epos »

epos- Later Sarmatians (18 /39 ) -defeat- Ironclad Principate Roman (51 /47 )

Thanks for the game !!!
Cunningcairn
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Posts: 1723
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by Cunningcairn »

IMC wrote:Against the odds.....IMC's Seleucids 32/54 beat Cunningcairns Sarmations 46/45

A marathon over twenty turns. One of the best games I have ever played. Somehow the pikes managed to stop the cavalry encircling them and presented few rears whilst they advanced and cut off the cavalry retreats until the very last rounds. Thanks Martin!!

I'll pick up any outstanding challenges tonight.

Ian
Thank you Ian! You played an excellent game screening your pike from my shooting with skirmishes while at the same time causing shooting casualties to my cavalry. This took its its toll as by the time (17th round?) I eventually found a gap in your line my losses were too high and the surviving elements had taken too many casualties. Your army was a very good balance of pike, skirmishes, medium foot and cavalry all well deployed.
Cunningcairn
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Posts: 1723
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by Cunningcairn »

MikeMarchant wrote:
Edmund_Blackadder wrote:
notjustdon wrote:Well you are only meant to be using one army anyway. payalag has not played any games and emilianojimenez seems to have stopped playing as no results seem to be coming up since the first few games. I'm still waiting for him to start against me.
Not sure if I've missed something as it's my first forum competition. I meant that I have been using literally the same units in every battle without making changes. I was under the impression others were changing the units within the same list according to which opponent they are playing. Is this wrong?
I've used exactly the same units in every battle too.


Best Wishes

Mike
I have made changes to my lists. This was standard practice in the FOG Digital League and I can't see anything in the rules saying we can't.
MikeMarchant
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 788
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:46 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by MikeMarchant »

[quote= Not sure if I've missed something as it's my first forum competition. I meant that I have been using literally the same units in every battle without making changes. I was under the impression others were changing the units within the same list according to which opponent they are playing. Is this wrong?[/quote]

I've used exactly the same units in every battle too.


Best Wishes

Mike[/quote]

I have made changes to my lists. This was standard practice in the FOG Digital League and I can't see anything in the rules saying we can't.[/quote]

Yes, certainly within the rules, and during the old FoG Digital League I used to tinker with my army constantly in response to the army I might be facing. The reasons I haven't with this army is partly because there's not very much room for variety with the Gepids and so not much point making changes, and partly because I've been lazy about it and simply choosing the same army each time has been quicker and easier.


Best Wishes

Mike
epos
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 273
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:45 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by epos »

Challenges to :

emilianojimenez - Early Catalan ------ pw: epos3
NikiforosFokas - Dominate Roman --- pw epos5
notjustdon
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 5:12 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by notjustdon »

My impression was that we all picked a 600pt army and you stuck with it all the way through with no changes. Nothing was said that changes could be made depending upon the army being played against and so I didn't. Could Okie clarify the situation please as I feel some players could have gained a possible advantage by chopping/changing armies to suit who they are facing!

notjustdon
MikeMarchant
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 788
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:46 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by MikeMarchant »

notjustdon wrote:My impression was that we all picked a 600pt army and you stuck with it all the way through with no changes. Nothing was said that changes could be made depending upon the army being played against and so I didn't. Could Okie clarify the situation please as I feel some players could have gained a possible advantage by chopping/changing armies to suit who they are facing!

notjustdon
I suppose it is odd that this is something that's never mentioned, but it's always done that way. Every competition I've ever seen, whether it's a league, a cup competition or a campaign, has operated in this way. You have an army list (Gepids in my case) and you have to play that army list in the competition, but the make-up of that army, specifically which units you play with in a particular battle, is entirely up to you to choose, so long as they come from the army list you've chosen or been allocated. No-one's been taking advantage, it's just perfectly normal behaviour to vary your army depending on the opponent you're playing, and people will have assumed this is the same in this case as in any other.

Really sorry if you didn't know this, Notjustdon, but if no-one thought to tell you, you couldn't have known.


Best Wishes

Mike
notjustdon
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 5:12 pm

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by notjustdon »

Ah, yes, but assuming doesn't make it correct! Will have to ask the question in future tournaments just to make it watertight.

Thanks anyway for your reply.
NikiforosFokas
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 627
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:59 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Special league Tournament

Post by NikiforosFokas »

NikiforosFokas' Romans wins against Edmund_Blackadder Graeco-Bactrian (77% vs 100%). A match than Richard was close to victory even if the bad terrain was against his cavarly-based army. Thanks for the nice game!!!
For Byzantium!!
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Leagues & Tournaments & Seeking Opponents”