Erik's Multiplayer scenarios

[Erik2]

Restricted number of British deployment locations.
Moved a few Japanese units south at start.
Added Japanese airstrip construction group.

[bruce1944]

The 2v2 as 1vs1 . Just to many darn units to keep track of. Maybe because we were playing both sides at the same time. I would lose track of what I was trying to do. Maybe if you cut the game in half, as it were, Northern and southern fronts??

[Erik2]

Changed the objective details (goals still the same).
The number of US transports the Japanese must sink is still not decided, a couple of 1v1 playtests need to be run first.

[Brenmusik]

Changed the objective details (goals still the same).
The number of US transports the Japanese must sink is still not decided, a couple of 1v1 playtests need to be run first.

Needs a little tweeking , end of the first turn.

E Augusta Bay.jpg (57.97 KiB) Viewed 3179 times

[Erik2]

I do have a flair for creating the odd quick-played scenario.
Changed the transports sunk from human US (which have none to start with...) to AI-US, that should help...

uploaded new version and challenges

[Brenmusik]

uploaded new version and challenges

D/loaded and turn sent.

[Erik2]

Added faction New Zealand to accommodate its lone Blenheim squadron.

[bruce1944]

where to find Empress Augusta Bay scenario?

[Brenmusik]

where to find Empress Augusta Bay scenario?

Custom Multiplayer Scenarios, second page.

[bruce1944]

Thanks. Picked it up. Now to find opponent. Brenmusik, Erik you interested in game?

[Erik2]

Bren & I have a game going with me as US.
I'd like a game with me as Japanese as well. Put up a challenge with password Erik and I'll grab it.

[Erik2]

Added scenario end triggers to all primary objectives to prevent auto-victory syndrome.

[bruce1944]

I hate to add to your plate , but Guam needs to be looked at for this auto victory syndrome also.

[Erik2]

Just did, look at the post above yours

[bruce1944]

Sorry just didn't look

[Erik2]

Complete overhaul of objectives.

Primary
Both the Japanese and the US must now sink at least 2 carriers and 2 battleships to win.
They also can't lose more than 1 carrier and 1 battleship.


Secondary
The Japanese must sink at least 6 US transports and can't lose more than 3 cruisers
The US must sink at least 4 cruisers and not lose more than 5 transports.
(The secondary objections are kind of mirrored).

This means the battle for the transports is just a prelude to the big battle later on (I hope).

[Erik2]

Halved income for all factions. It was too easy to just buy new hardware whenever a ship was sunk.
Restricted deployable ports to the objectives ones. You now want to keep your naval assets ship shape as there may be a long way to the nearest port repair facilities.
Removed all unneccesary flags. No purchasing/deploying land units anywhere.

[bruce1944]

Can we try War in the Pacific 2.3 as a 1vs1 game?

[Erik2]

Can we try War in the Pacific 2.3 as a 1vs1 game?

We can, give me a bit of time to transform it.

[Erik2]

Halved income for both factions. It was too easy to just buy new hardware whenever a ship was sunk.
Restricted deployable ports to the objectives ones. You now want to keep your naval assets ship shape as there may be a long way to the nearest port repair facilities.
Removed all unneccesary flags. No purchasing/deploying land units anywhere.