Good luck with free time for BFMcGuba wrote: Sun Aug 19, 2018 8:59 pmYes, these are all theoretically possible now, however I did not have the time to check and test the new executable yet. I am very busy at work, usually doing 12 hours a day this month.Yrfin wrote: Fri Aug 17, 2018 1:08 pm With Mega Fix from Mr. Rudankort (256 Zone ! Thanks), we will be able to see in future version BF:
- Murmansk on Map (and Arctic Convoys perhaps )
- Spain in action (Gibraltar) ?Nevertheless, I am finishing the next version which will bring a lot of changes. I wrote about the road map and the possible improvements in my previous post. But all these will take time.
Any information about date release BF 2.0 ?
Effective range of shrapnel - 400 m. MG - same.Yrfin wrote: Fri Aug 17, 2018 1:08 pmI am fairly content with the current stats of light AT guns. A little increase in SA could be possible, though. However, I do not really agree with your thinking that a 37 mm Pak could fire more "bullets" than an MG34 in the same period of time. Without even going into details like the very limited range of shrapnel ammunition compared to the effective range of a MG 34/42 machine gun.2. Small gun like 37-57 mm can use shrapnel. So SA must be 3-4.
Lets see:
- MG34 about 100 bullets/min (practical).
- 37 mm PaK. 0.6 kg/10 g = 60 bullets x 20 shot/min = 1200 bullets/min. Its a MINI-GUN
- 57 mm ZiS-2. 324 bullets x 10.8 g at Shot !
Fast small artillery (up to 75 mm) with shrapnel > MG.
It was from Napoleons War, then the WW I and was continue at WWII.
Next Q about your E-file:
Marders
7.5 L/46 (SA/HA)
Marder II 3 16
Marder IIIH 4 16
Marder IIIM 2 16
7.6 L/41
Marder IID 4 15
Marder III 3 15
1. 7.6 (modifyded F-22) have same ballistics like 7.5 in HA.
2. What make "float" SA from 2 to 4 for same Gun ?
3. Why SA for Marder equal 4 for vehicle with 75-76 mm gun ?
Lets see StuGs...
7.5 L/43 (SA/HA)
StuG IIIF 5 15
Oops... SAME gun.
StuG IIIF/8 6 16
And Tank Unit with 7.5 gun have SA 8 ...
Dont forget about strange "gamesdesigners" decision in game Rules:
"AT attacking by Inf: -2 HA" and "Inf attacking by AT : +2 def"
Something is wrong in the state of Denmark...
Oops, I mean E-file of coz.
Any suggestion ?















