So if it was you it could meaning:philqw78 wrote:It was Navarese and it was me.
massed lancers
crazy table sitting LH
Flank marches to nowhere.
What was the secret this time?
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Ghaznavid, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

So if it was you it could meaning:philqw78 wrote:It was Navarese and it was me.

i have to admit i rather wish i'd taken more notice of Phil and taken Navaresse instead of alex mac.philqw78 wrote:It was Navarese and it was me.

Route 1.hazelbark wrote:So if it was you it could meaning:philqw78 wrote:It was Navarese and it was me.
massed lancers
crazy table sitting LH
Flank marches to nowhere.
What was the secret this time?

So everyone will go to knights and I will go to elephants. Brilliant.davesaunders23 wrote:i have to admit i rather wish i'd taken more notice of Phil and taken Navaresse instead of alex mac.philqw78 wrote:It was Navarese and it was me.
having thought that the "super" troops of v2 would be knights, pike and elephants, i have to say that's been reduced to just knights.. certainly not elephants. moan moan.
dave.
Most of the "big boys" were in medieval this year. I played the players in 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th. Breaking two of them, one winning draw against Dave Handley and a flat draw against Pete.timmy1 wrote:This is the second time in 3 or 4 years that dave_r has been first loser by entering the period where the big boys aren't (and I am sorry but if Pete is taking Aztec's I know he is not serious...) and having exactly the same score as the winner. Even with those dodgy dice he could not win. dave_r, when exactly are you going to win properly at Britcon...?
Most of the "big boys" were in medieval this year. I played the players in 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th. Breaking two of them, one winning draw against Dave Handley and a flat draw against Pete.timmy1 wrote:This is the second time in 3 or 4 years that dave_r has been first loser by entering the period where the big boys aren't (and I am sorry but if Pete is taking Aztec's I know he is not serious...) and having exactly the same score as the winner. Even with those dodgy dice he could not win. dave_r, when exactly are you going to win properly at Britcon...?


he speaks so ... he is obliged to tell twice or more... what would he say otherwise?philqw78 wrote:Yeah, we got it the first time Dave. Is there some sort of insecurity there so you need to tell us twice
Sorry, there was a problem somewhere between the monitor and the chairphilqw78 wrote:Yeah, we got it the first time Dave. Is there some sort of insecurity there so you need to tell us twice

dave_r wrote:Sorry, there was a problem somewhere between the monitor and the chairphilqw78 wrote:Yeah, we got it the first time Dave. Is there some sort of insecurity there so you need to tell us twice

It's his ego, and unfortunately for us in the UK, we won't hear the last of this (even if he had to go to some weird tiebreaker to "win"- despite actually being joint first "again"LEmpereur wrote:he speaks so ... he is obliged to tell twice or more... what would he say otherwise?philqw78 wrote:Yeah, we got it the first time Dave. Is there some sort of insecurity there so you need to tell us twice
You were the one who calledy army "kebab"spike wrote:It's his ego, and unfortunately for us in the UK, we won't hear the last of this (even if he had to go to some weird tiebreaker to "win"- despite actually being joint first "again"LEmpereur wrote:he speaks so ... he is obliged to tell twice or more... what would he say otherwise?philqw78 wrote:Yeah, we got it the first time Dave. Is there some sort of insecurity there so you need to tell us twice)

[/quote][quote="philqw78]
Route 1.
And a possible flank march designed into the army if necessary

6 BG of Armd Kn. End date was 1066 so could take cav, but that would have been foolish.hazelbark wrote:Armored Knight lancers?philqw78 wrote:Route 1.
And a possible flank march designed into the army if necessary
?Just bunches?

Isn't that a type of camping cooker!!timmy1 wrote:So you are not even primus inter pares

It was surely about an Ottoman army!dave_r wrote:...You were the one who calledy army "kebab"

To coock kebab ?titanu wrote:...Isn't that a type of camping cooker!!

......and would have been if it was not for your outragiously lucky dice rollingdave_r wrote:[
You were the one who calledy army "kebab"