Conforming...

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Re: Conforming...

Post by gozerius »

The key phrase is
must pivot and/or shift by the minimum necessary to line up with the enemy bases in contact.
The first bullet indicates that to conform you either line up in full front edge contact with an enemy base, or in overlap. They are equally valid, and the bases that conform will fight in melee, though not always against the base they fought in impact.
This is then demonstrated in the diagrams in which, in each case, bases in contact move to line up with the enemy base, or overlap position, which is the shortest move necessary to reach a valid conform. The caption you are misquoting is actually part of the follow up where bases that are not in contact move to maintain BG integrity. This causes the outside base (not originally in contact) to end in overlap. You will notice that there are two bases in contact with a single base in that illustration. The base with the shortest move moves into FE contact with the original enemy base, and the other base moves its shortest move which is FE contact with the adjacent base. The emphasis is on shortest move necessary to line up.
In the OP the situation is the same as on page 93 (V2.0) where the left-hand Cav base in contact with the enemy shifts the minimum necessary, to an overlap, because the base on the right is more fully in contact with the enemy base originally contacted. Similarly, on the right, the bases must shift right to line up by the minimum necessary but are blocked by enemy, and do not move at all. They do not move left, even though there is no obstruction, because that is NOT the minimum move necessary to line up.
The same relationship is demonstrated on pages 97 and 99 which shows BGs at impact and again, after conforming, in melee. The BG on the left moves the minimum necessary to line up, which puts one base in FE contact and the other in overlap.
Please get it out of your head that only full front edge contact is a valid conform. That is not what the rule says.
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3111
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Re: Conforming...

Post by petedalby »

Hi Chris - it will be no consolation to you, but discussions on conforming probably outnumber any other topic.

I have previously read the rules exactly as you appear to have on this issue but in the interests of having a consensus I am happy to accept the BHGS clarifications.

So it is B - or at least it is B if the BHGS clarifications are being used.
Pete
ChrisTofalos
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 247
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 5:18 pm

Re: Conforming...

Post by ChrisTofalos »

OK. Apologies to all. I've just got the definitive answer from Richard Bodley Scott and it's outcome 'B'!
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8835
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Conforming...

Post by philqw78 »

ChrisTofalos wrote:OK. Apologies to all. I've just got the definitive answer from Richard Bodley Scott and it's outcome 'B'!
Don't be sorry, we all like a good argument.

Well I do
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3857
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: Conforming...

Post by dave_r »

ChrisTofalos wrote:OK. Apologies to all. I've just got the definitive answer from Richard Bodley Scott and it's outcome 'B'!
I'd be wary about definitive answers from RBS. Especially after the recent Mamluk Javelinmen incident...
Evaluator of Supremacy
titanu
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:26 am

Re: Conforming...

Post by titanu »

dave_r wrote:... the recent Mamluk Javelinmen incident...
Expand :D
zoltan
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Conforming...

Post by zoltan »

Welcome to Barkerville....
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8835
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Conforming...

Post by philqw78 »

titanu wrote:
dave_r wrote:... the recent Mamluk Javelinmen incident...
Expand :D
He likes my lists
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

Re: Conforming...

Post by ravenflight »

ChrisTofalos wrote:OK. Apologies to all. I've just got the definitive answer from Richard Bodley Scott and it's outcome 'B'!
It's quite simple to get the bases to conform to 'A'. As stated in a previous thread, if the bases charging down the page do a microscopic wheel to their left, they then conform the other way. Fracking stupid if you ask me, but there it is.
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3857
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: Conforming...

Post by dave_r »

titanu wrote:
dave_r wrote:... the recent Mamluk Javelinmen incident...
Expand :D
Mr Powell was allowed to have Poor LF Javelinmen in his Mamluk list. I thought that this was illegal as that option wasn't present in the excel spreadsheet I had made. Phil said, and I quote "That's why we look at books and not at excel spreadsheets". HIs army was declared legal by RBS.

I then find out that my spreadsheet was correct and therefore Phil's argument is in tatters...
Evaluator of Supremacy
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Re: Conforming...

Post by gozerius »

ravenflight wrote:
ChrisTofalos wrote:OK. Apologies to all. I've just got the definitive answer from Richard Bodley Scott and it's outcome 'B'!
It's quite simple to get the bases to conform to 'A'. As stated in a previous thread, if the bases charging down the page do a microscopic wheel to their left, they then conform the other way. Fracking stupid if you ask me, but there it is.
Do I detect a little whine with that cheese?
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

Re: Conforming...

Post by ravenflight »

gozerius wrote:
ravenflight wrote:
ChrisTofalos wrote:OK. Apologies to all. I've just got the definitive answer from Richard Bodley Scott and it's outcome 'B'!
It's quite simple to get the bases to conform to 'A'. As stated in a previous thread, if the bases charging down the page do a microscopic wheel to their left, they then conform the other way. Fracking stupid if you ask me, but there it is.
Do I detect a little whine with that cheese?
Do I detect a moron who calls a legal move cheese?
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8835
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Conforming...

Post by philqw78 »

Who gets the saucer of milk?
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
lawrenceg
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:24 pm
Location: Former British Empire

Re: Conforming...

Post by lawrenceg »

ravenflight wrote:
Do I detect a moron who calls a legal move cheese?
Isn't "cheese" by definition a legal move? If it wasn't legal it, would be cheating.
Lawrence Greaves
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Re: Conforming...

Post by gozerius »

Ravenflight, I apologize.
I thought you were referring to the stupidity the supposed legality of wheeling slightly to change the base to which you conform because you are only in corner contact.

I guess its my whine and your cheese.
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
titanu
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:26 am

Re: Conforming...

Post by titanu »

dave_r wrote:.. HIs army was declared legal by RBS....
Yes but I suspect he can count :D

See:

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=62534
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”