Potato, tomato.petedalby wrote:I'm not sure that's strictly true Phil - isn't it the number of dice in V2? Could be a factor.providing no less bases would hit.
Wheeling When Charging Potential Evaders
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: Wheeling When Charging Potential Evaders
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
zoltan
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser

- Posts: 901
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Wheeling When Charging Potential Evaders
Phil is correct. The number of dice is a function of the number of bases that hit. Let's call the whole thing off!philqw78 wrote:Potato, tomato.petedalby wrote:I'm not sure that's strictly true Phil - isn't it the number of dice in V2? Could be a factor.providing no less bases would hit.
-
batesmotel
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 3616
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm
Re: Wheeling When Charging Potential Evaders
Number of dice is also a function of disorder and other factors so number of dice is not entirely equivalent of the number of bases.zoltan wrote: Phil is correct. The number of dice is a function of the number of bases that hit. Let's call the whole thing off!
Chris
....where life is beautiful all the time
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: Wheeling When Charging Potential Evaders
I would think this may have some unintended consquences
If a BG of LH could flank charge a BG of battle troops, providing it did a wheel, it would only get 1 dice per 2 bases. If other skirmishers where to that LH BGs front because it would then get 4 dice for charging forwards it would not be allowed to wheel
_____
______
_______
:arrow:____
_
_
LH cannot wheel to contact
battle troops if
are also lights
If a BG of LH could flank charge a BG of battle troops, providing it did a wheel, it would only get 1 dice per 2 bases. If other skirmishers where to that LH BGs front because it would then get 4 dice for charging forwards it would not be allowed to wheel
_____
______
_______
_
_
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Re: Wheeling When Charging Potential Evaders
Don't know whether it is unintended, but it sounds eminently reasonable - why would light horse charge battle troops if they can charge other lights, against whom they are much more effective?philqw78 wrote:I would think this may have some unintended consquences
If a BG of LH could flank charge a BG of battle troops, providing it did a wheel, it would only get 1 dice per 2 bases. If other skirmishers where to that LH BGs front because it would then get 4 dice for charging forwards it would not be allowed to wheel
_____![]()
______![]()
_______![]()
:arrow:____
![]()
![]()
![]()
_![]()
![]()
_![]()
![]()
LH cannot wheel to contact
battle troops if
are also lights
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: Wheeling When Charging Potential Evaders
Because if the distance between them and the other lights is 7MU they are going to have no effect at all.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
Re: Wheeling When Charging Potential Evaders
Nice way to secure a unit against those "in the front with lancers, in the flank with LH" situations. The LH would often have to be actually facing the flank to avoid distraction
-
petedalby
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3118
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Fareham, UK
Re: Wheeling When Charging Potential Evaders
So what did we decide? Potatoes. Tomatoes.
I think the dice have it.
I think the dice have it.
Pete
