LORDS OF ITALY circa 280 BC

[Morbio]

Fogman, was that the last result you just posted? What's the outcome? Who became the Lord of Italy?

Whatever the end result, thanks very much for organising this, it was fun. Some nicely balanced armies, although Rome was a little stronger than the rest, but that's not surprising since they were the superpower of the age.

[ulysisgrunt]

You can't argue against historical results
Danny Weitz

[fogman]

Fogman, was that the last result you just posted? What's the outcome? Who became the Lord of Italy?

Whatever the end result, thanks very much for organising this, it was fun. Some nicely balanced armies, although Rome was a little stronger than the rest, but that's not surprising since they were the superpower of the age.

Rome and Epirus were the most successful. Spears armies are certainly weaker in comparison, as it should be. In a way the comp is unbalanced which was not the intent but mirror games take care of that. Too bad you don't have all the books.

[deeter]

Final rematch result:

Gallic (Deeter) 35/44 vs. Rome (lydianed) 47/38

A very exciting battle that I though I'd lost until near the end. Naked men rule!

Deeter

[iandavidsmith]

Last game

iandavidsmith: early gauls (lowlands) 21/41 win
vrs
lydianed: later carthaginian (pre-235) 47/45 loss

thanks for the game,
Cheers
Ian