Done!^^kronenblatt wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 6:17 pmAlright, please then post an updated attack list, or amend the original.Aetius39 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 6:14 pmok so let them all choose the terrain!^^kronenblatt wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 2:18 pm
1 and 2 are not quite right, since they should also include a -30 FP adjustment due to you choosing terrain, i.e., -24 FP in total for these two.
Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Abandoned
Moderators: kronenblatt, Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
Creator of "There Can Be Only One" tournaments in Field of Glory 2.
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
Game against Dim30 set up!
pw is ptolemy
Aetius
pw is ptolemy
Aetius
Creator of "There Can Be Only One" tournaments in Field of Glory 2.
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
Roman 105-25 BC attacks Judea + 10 + 30 (let opponent chose terrain) = + 40 FP . Doley50 as opponent.
Game set up,pwd 1234.
Game set up,pwd 1234.
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
3. Aetius (Romans 105-25 BC) attacks Judea 6 FP + 30 FP (opponent choose terrain) Dim as opponent.
game setup. pw salomon
game setup. pw salomon
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
1. Aetius (Romans 105-25 BC) attacks Asia 6 FP + 30 FP (opponent choose terrain) Doyley50 as opponent.
Game set up.pwd 1234.
Game set up.pwd 1234.
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
Roman( 105-25BC) attacks Narbonensis FP50, opponent chooses terrain, Kronenblatt as opponent.
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
Hi Doyley. mp shoul be 40*32. with 48*32 we take too much time to contact if we are on different side. can you launch another game please.
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
Oh spit! Sorry, I'll redo it and PM you when done.
Alan
Alan
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4631
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Historical benchmark
As a rough comparison, this is the approximate historical extent of the Roman territories in this time period (90 - 50 BC):


kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4631
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
1. Roman 105-25 BC with Numidian or Moorish 55 BC - 6 AD allies attacks Tarraconensis. +45* FP. deeter as opponent.
2. Roman 105-25 BC with Numidian or Moorish 55 BC - 6 AD allies attacks Achaea. +45 FP. Aetius39 as opponent.
* +70 FP divided by 2 = +35 FP minus 20 FP per battle = +15 FP plus 30 FP for letting opponent select map terrain = +45 FP.
2. Roman 105-25 BC with Numidian or Moorish 55 BC - 6 AD allies attacks Achaea. +45 FP. Aetius39 as opponent.
* +70 FP divided by 2 = +35 FP minus 20 FP per battle = +15 FP plus 30 FP for letting opponent select map terrain = +45 FP.
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4631
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
Aetius39: 2. Roman 105-25 BC attacks Lugdunensis. +36 FP. kronenblatt as opponent.
Doyley50: 1. Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis. +80 FP. kronenblatt as opponent.
... I'm stuck in the Gaul industry...
This round and latest.
Games set up, with password GaulGuerrilla
PM sent.
Doyley50: 1. Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis. +80 FP. kronenblatt as opponent.
... I'm stuck in the Gaul industry...

Games set up, with password GaulGuerrilla
PM sent.
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
If it's not too late, I would like to make two attacks:
1. Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis. +45 FP. kronenblatt as opponent. (I think that's right, but whatever half my max point is.)
2. Roman 105-25 BC attacks Dalmatia. +45 FP. doylee50 as opponent.
Deeter
1. Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis. +45 FP. kronenblatt as opponent. (I think that's right, but whatever half my max point is.)
2. Roman 105-25 BC attacks Dalmatia. +45 FP. doylee50 as opponent.
Deeter
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4631
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
It's not too late at all, Willie. And you'll actually get +50 FP (your +80 FP from Virtus of 8 divided into two battles results in +40 FP adjusted with -20 FP in each battle, in +20 FP and then the +30 FP for letting opponent choose terrain into a final +50 FP.)deeter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 11:34 pm If it's not too late, I would like to make two attacks:
1. Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis. +45 FP. kronenblatt as opponent. (I think that's right, but whatever half my max point is.)
2. Roman 105-25 BC attacks Dalmatia. +45 FP. doylee50 as opponent.
Deeter
I'm just a bit disappointed to get a third Gallic defense this round...

kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
"I'm just a bit disappointed to get a third Gallic defense this round...
I would have loved to get that Dalmatia at least... Could you consider switching?"
I have no objections.

I have no objections.
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
Cool! I am happy to switch defenders. So let it be done.
Deeter
Deeter
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4631
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
Great: thanks!
Then the following attacks by deeter:
1. Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis. +50 FP. Doyley50 as opponent.
2. Roman 105-25 BC attacks Dalmatia. +50 FP. kronenblatt as opponent.
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4631
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Round 5 (90-50 BC): Battle resolutions
Battles
1.1. Aetius39 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Asia (with 1636 FP) versus Doyley50 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
1.2. Aetius39 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Lugdunensis (with 1636 FP) versus kronenblatt as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
1.3. Aetius39 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Judea (with 1636 FP) versus dim30 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
2.1. deeter as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis (with 1650 FP) versus Doyley50 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
2.2. deeter as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Dalmatia (with 1650 FP) versus kronenblatt as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
3.1. dim30 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis (with 1580 FP) using Mediterranean Agricultural versus deeter as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
3.2. dim30 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Judea (with 1640 FP) versus Doyley50 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
3.3. dim30 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Syria (with 1640 FP) versus Aetius39 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
4.1. Doyley50 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis (with 1680 FP) versus kronenblatt as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
5.1. kronenblatt as Roman 105-25 BC (with Numidian or Moorish 55 BC - 6 AD allies attacks Tarraconensis (with 1645 FP) versus deeter as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
5.2. kronenblatt as Roman 105-25 BC (with Numidian or Moorish 55 BC - 6 AD allies attacks Achaea (with 1645 FP) versus Aetius39 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
Please note
1.1. Aetius39 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Asia (with 1636 FP) versus Doyley50 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
1.2. Aetius39 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Lugdunensis (with 1636 FP) versus kronenblatt as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
1.3. Aetius39 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Judea (with 1636 FP) versus dim30 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
2.1. deeter as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis (with 1650 FP) versus Doyley50 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
2.2. deeter as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Dalmatia (with 1650 FP) versus kronenblatt as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
3.1. dim30 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis (with 1580 FP) using Mediterranean Agricultural versus deeter as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
3.2. dim30 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Judea (with 1640 FP) versus Doyley50 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
3.3. dim30 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Syria (with 1640 FP) versus Aetius39 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
4.1. Doyley50 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis (with 1680 FP) versus kronenblatt as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
5.1. kronenblatt as Roman 105-25 BC (with Numidian or Moorish 55 BC - 6 AD allies attacks Tarraconensis (with 1645 FP) versus deeter as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
5.2. kronenblatt as Roman 105-25 BC (with Numidian or Moorish 55 BC - 6 AD allies attacks Achaea (with 1645 FP) versus Aetius39 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
Please note
- The defender selects an army list from the TT Mod v1.5.32b, whose time period overlaps the current round's (90 - 50 BC) and whose geographic location fits the attacked province.
- If the Romans historically had conquered the attacked province in full by that time period, there will be a civil war battle, using the same Roman army list for the defender (albeit without allies).
- Please use a generous, friendly and constructive approach, both when it comes to selecting army lists (especially as defender) and when it comes to approving or disapproving such army lists (especially as attacker)
.
- The defender thereafter creates the game (with himself as Side B), using the TT Mod v1.5.32b, posting in the campaign thread and PM'ing the attacker.
- The attack will take the form of a Custom Battle:
- Scenario: Open Battle.
- Turn limit: 24 turns.
- Map size: Wide (40x32).
- Force size: as per above (i.e., the defender always 1600 FP).
- Map type: as per above.
- No map re-rolls will be made.
- The winner, or the player having incurred the fewest casualties, reports the results in the campaign thread.
- Battles to be concluded and reported within a five-week period, i.e., by February 21.
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4631
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
2.2. deeter as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Dalmatia (with 1650 FP) versus kronenblatt as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
Game set up with password PaionianPartisan and PM sent.
Game set up with password PaionianPartisan and PM sent.
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
2.1. deeter as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Narbonensis (with 1650 FP) versus Doyley50 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
Game set up,pwd 1234.
Game set up,pwd 1234.
Re: Imperium Romanum - part I (the Rise): Ongoing
3.2. dim30 as Roman 105-25 BC attacks Judea (with 1640 FP) versus Doyley50 as opponent (as always with 1600 FP).
Roman victory for dim30. 13% - 57%
Roman victory for dim30. 13% - 57%