The Dustbin
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division E
snooky51 - Ghaznavid 962-1187 AD defeats Barrold713 - German 888-932 AD with French 888-1049 AD allies -- 63-58
German cavalry was separated from their infantry by a forest, which proved to be the deciding factor. Ghaznavids routed the German cavalry early and used what routs they could squeeze elsewhere to win the race to 60. Considering how the German infantry cut through the Ghaznavid army like a hot knife through butter, the early 20something-0 lead proved decisive.
(3-1)
snooky51 - Ghaznavid 962-1187 AD defeats Barrold713 - German 888-932 AD with French 888-1049 AD allies -- 63-58
German cavalry was separated from their infantry by a forest, which proved to be the deciding factor. Ghaznavids routed the German cavalry early and used what routs they could squeeze elsewhere to win the race to 60. Considering how the German infantry cut through the Ghaznavid army like a hot knife through butter, the early 20something-0 lead proved decisive.
(3-1)
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
SawyerK (Roman 285-312 AD) defeated MikeMarchant (Roman 24 BC-196 AD) by 61 to 48.
The game was essentially tied at 56 each before two unit recoveries in the last two turns for my army led to a lucky victory. Props to Mike for a very well designed offense that should have had a better outcome.
SawyerK (Roman 285-312 AD) defeated MikeMarchant (Roman 24 BC-196 AD) by 61 to 48.
The game was essentially tied at 56 each before two unit recoveries in the last two turns for my army led to a lucky victory. Props to Mike for a very well designed offense that should have had a better outcome.
-
Captainwaltersavage
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL

- Posts: 400
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 2:20 pm
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Captainwaltersavage - Roman 24BC-196AD with Jewish 64 BC-6AD allies
Challenges
snooky51 - Sassanid 477-590 AD with Hun (Sabir) 463-558 AD allies
Password: Division
Challenges
snooky51 - Sassanid 477-590 AD with Hun (Sabir) 463-558 AD allies
Password: Division
-
Captainwaltersavage
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL

- Posts: 400
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 2:20 pm
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Captainwaltersavage - Roman 24BC-196AD with Jewish 64 BC-6AD allies
Challenges
snooky51 - Sassanid 477-590 AD with Hun (Sabir) 463-558 AD allies
Password: Division
Challenges
snooky51 - Sassanid 477-590 AD with Hun (Sabir) 463-558 AD allies
Password: Division
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
rexhurley (Carthage) defeats Questar17 (Pikes) 73/36
game was tight into the last turn when a series of exploding pike blocks caused the score to blow out
rexhurley (Carthage) defeats Questar17 (Pikes) 73/36
game was tight into the last turn when a series of exploding pike blocks caused the score to blow out
-
DanZanzibar
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA

- Posts: 246
- Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2020 6:29 am
Re: DanZanzibar has won Early Middle Ages Division E!
Thanks guys! Well I entered 3, but I have a shot at the triple. All depends on the last match of CA.
-
Macedonczyk
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2019 10:25 pm
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
Macedonczyk (Assyrian+Egyptian) beat Batesmotel (Achaemenid w Mede allies) 46:7
In this game it looked like my horses took some amphetamine or EPO. 2/3 of my attacks ended with a rear attack (sometimes foreign skirmishes or other horses helped in this by prolonging the evade, but still there was an awful lot of luck in these attacks).
Macedonczyk (Assyrian+Egyptian) beat Batesmotel (Achaemenid w Mede allies) 46:7
In this game it looked like my horses took some amphetamine or EPO. 2/3 of my attacks ended with a rear attack (sometimes foreign skirmishes or other horses helped in this by prolonging the evade, but still there was an awful lot of luck in these attacks).
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division E
BishUK (Byzantine) Beats Captainwaltersavage (Roman) 56 - 29
BishUK (Byzantine) Beats Captainwaltersavage (Roman) 56 - 29
-
Morbio
- Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier

- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:40 pm
- Location: Wokingham, UK
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
Morbio (Arab, City 300-633 AD with Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD allies) defeats Questar17 (Ostrogoth 493-561 AD with Frankish 496-599 AD allies) 60 - 44
Morbio (Arab, City 300-633 AD with Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD allies) defeats Questar17 (Ostrogoth 493-561 AD with Frankish 496-599 AD allies) 60 - 44
-
Cunningcairn
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind

- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
Cunningcairn - Dailami 928-1055 AD with Armenian 885-1045 AD allies beat paulmcneil - Polish 966-1057 AD with Viking 900-1049 AD allies by 51% to 26%
Cunningcairn - Dailami 928-1055 AD with Armenian 885-1045 AD allies beat paulmcneil - Polish 966-1057 AD with Viking 900-1049 AD allies by 51% to 26%
-
SnuggleBunnies
- Major-General - Jagdtiger

- Posts: 2892
- Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:09 am
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
MP Replays:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjUQy6dEqR53NwoGgjxixLg
Pike and Shot-Sengoku Jidai Crossover Mod:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=116259
Middle Earth mod:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1029243#p1029243
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjUQy6dEqR53NwoGgjxixLg
Pike and Shot-Sengoku Jidai Crossover Mod:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=116259
Middle Earth mod:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1029243#p1029243
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Addition to Rule 5 for Season 9 . . .
There have been too many instances this season of players prematurely surrendering matches when the scores have been relatively close, and even one occasion where the resigning player was actually ahead on the scoreboard. This is not too far removed from failing to play a match at all, in my opinion, something that often affects a player's entry rights in a subsequent season. While I don't want to stop players resigning when they are well beaten, I think we need some guidelines to stop the throwing of matches before they have been decided properly.
So, this text, or something very close to it, will be added to Rule 5 for Season 9 . . .
"Except in situations where players have mutually agreed a draw, it is preferable that everyone plays their matches to a full conclusion where one of the armies is routed. However, it is acceptable for a player to surrender before then if they feel they have no chance of gaining any points from the match. The threshold for doing this is if a player is 15% or more behind on the scoreboard, for example if they are losing 0-20 or 10-35.
A player should not be surrendering a match if their score is still within 15% of their opponent. If, for example, a player is losing 20-30 or 5-15 then they should continue the match until one army is routed, or the acceptable threshold for resignation is reached. If a player still decides to surrender a match in these circumstances then such an occurrence will be recorded. A player who does this repeatedly may then suffer reduced entry rights for the next season that they enter the tournament."
So, this text, or something very close to it, will be added to Rule 5 for Season 9 . . .
"Except in situations where players have mutually agreed a draw, it is preferable that everyone plays their matches to a full conclusion where one of the armies is routed. However, it is acceptable for a player to surrender before then if they feel they have no chance of gaining any points from the match. The threshold for doing this is if a player is 15% or more behind on the scoreboard, for example if they are losing 0-20 or 10-35.
A player should not be surrendering a match if their score is still within 15% of their opponent. If, for example, a player is losing 20-30 or 5-15 then they should continue the match until one army is routed, or the acceptable threshold for resignation is reached. If a player still decides to surrender a match in these circumstances then such an occurrence will be recorded. A player who does this repeatedly may then suffer reduced entry rights for the next season that they enter the tournament."
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Calling MadMaxBot and texanotedesco . . .
MadMaxBot and texanotedesco,
I need to hear from you by Sunday morning at the latest that you are still playing and are trying to complete all your matches by the close of the tournament on Sunday 16th August. Challenges have now been issued by your opponents for all your remaining matches and PM's have been sent to you. If you fail to contact me to let me know what you are intending to do by Sunday morning I will deal with all these outstanding matches as provided for by Rule 6.
Note: this message has also been sent separately as a PM to both MadMaxBot and texanotedesco.
I need to hear from you by Sunday morning at the latest that you are still playing and are trying to complete all your matches by the close of the tournament on Sunday 16th August. Challenges have now been issued by your opponents for all your remaining matches and PM's have been sent to you. If you fail to contact me to let me know what you are intending to do by Sunday morning I will deal with all these outstanding matches as provided for by Rule 6.
Note: this message has also been sent separately as a PM to both MadMaxBot and texanotedesco.
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Calling MadMaxBot and texanotedesco . . .
The matches in question are as follows . . .
MadMaxBot
Classical Antiquity Division E
v baldrick52
v rs2excelsior
v snooky51
v Stew101
Biblical Division C
v Barrold713
v gamercb
v MikeMarchant
v rs2excelsior
v sarmation
v SpeedyCM
texanotedesco
Late Antiquity Division E
v Aetius39 - match awarded to Aetius39 under 30-day provisions of Rule 6
v baldrick52
v Captainwaltersavage - movement in this game 23/7
v gamercb
v grumpydaddy845
v snooky51 - there is movement in this match and texanotedesco visited the forum today 22/7
v Tratmot
Early Middle Ages Division E
v Barrold713
v snooky51 - there is movement in this match and texanotedesco visited the forum today 22/7
v Tratmot
If there is any progress in any of these matches could players please let me know.
MadMaxBot
Classical Antiquity Division E
v baldrick52
v rs2excelsior
v snooky51
v Stew101
Biblical Division C
v Barrold713
v gamercb
v MikeMarchant
v rs2excelsior
v sarmation
v SpeedyCM
texanotedesco
Late Antiquity Division E
v Aetius39 - match awarded to Aetius39 under 30-day provisions of Rule 6
v baldrick52
v Captainwaltersavage - movement in this game 23/7
v gamercb
v grumpydaddy845
v snooky51 - there is movement in this match and texanotedesco visited the forum today 22/7
v Tratmot
Early Middle Ages Division E
v Barrold713
v snooky51 - there is movement in this match and texanotedesco visited the forum today 22/7
v Tratmot
If there is any progress in any of these matches could players please let me know.
-
Captainwaltersavage
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL

- Posts: 400
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 2:20 pm
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division E
Captainwaltersavage - Roman 24BC-196AD with Jewish 64 BC-6AD allies defeated gamercb - Lombard 568-569 AD 40-12.
It was closer than the score suggests with another legion about to break and the Lombard warbands holding their right flank. and beating on my medium spears from a hilltop. I brought lots of cav to the battle having learned my lesson from the Byzantines and they did sterling work against the lancers and cav archers. Thanks for a real nailbiting game as I took some chances that lucked out.
Captainwaltersavage - Roman 24BC-196AD with Jewish 64 BC-6AD allies defeated gamercb - Lombard 568-569 AD 40-12.
It was closer than the score suggests with another legion about to break and the Lombard warbands holding their right flank. and beating on my medium spears from a hilltop. I brought lots of cav to the battle having learned my lesson from the Byzantines and they did sterling work against the lancers and cav archers. Thanks for a real nailbiting game as I took some chances that lucked out.
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
-
Schweetness101
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser

- Posts: 928
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 6:12 am
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Division A
Schweetness101 - Andalusian 756-1049 AD
challenges
Nosy_Rat - Frankish 751-887 AD with Croatian 625-849 AD allies
pw: 123123
Schweetness101 - Andalusian 756-1049 AD
challenges
Nosy_Rat - Frankish 751-887 AD with Croatian 625-849 AD allies
pw: 123123
My Mods:
Ancient Greek https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=977908#p977908
Dark Ages Britain https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=106417
Anarchy (Medieval) https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=987488#p987488
Ancient Greek https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=977908#p977908
Dark Ages Britain https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=106417
Anarchy (Medieval) https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=987488#p987488



