The Dustbin
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
-
Geoffrey.P.Smith
- Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:13 am
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div F
DanZanzibar; Carthage235-146bc with Spanish Allies
Blagrot: Samnite 355-272bc with Italian Hill Tribe Allies
Morat: Roman 199-106bc with Greek Allies
Brenmusik: Slave Revolt 73-71bc
Private Messages sent with password
Have fun & I hope I can give you a decent fight
DanZanzibar; Carthage235-146bc with Spanish Allies
Blagrot: Samnite 355-272bc with Italian Hill Tribe Allies
Morat: Roman 199-106bc with Greek Allies
Brenmusik: Slave Revolt 73-71bc
Private Messages sent with password
Have fun & I hope I can give you a decent fight
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
Karvon (Roman 24 BC–196 AD with Jewish 64 BC–6 AD allies) defeated Schweetness101 - (Byzantine 551-578 AD) 60-59 for a 3-1 win.
(3-1)
We looked with a bit of despair at what essentially was a large plain with a single large forest towards the left of our center but well on the Byzantine side of the field. The legion tightened their chin straps in anticipation of a very long and hard day. We deployed most of our legion in simple checkerboard with auxiliaries on the wings and our horse in reserve. A few light foot screened our line. The Byzantines deployed a long line of horse; lancers formed the bulk of the line making up the center and right, with a fair number of horse archers on the left. A small body of foot, a couple of legio and archer units were on their right anchored on the woods. they were screened by a handful of light foot. Our plan was to advance our line so the woods would shield our left and refuse our right in hopes of delaying the expected Byzantine attempt to envelop us.
Both armies advanced to contact; initially, the Byzantine lancers essentially pinned the bulk of our line while the battle developed on the flanks. On our right the Byzantine horse archers attempted to flank us, and we countered by committing our reserve horse and aggressively chasing them off with support from some of our medium and light foot. We traded losses here, but blocked the envelopment attempt. In the center, we suffered some casualties to shooting and made a few risky attempts to drive back the lancers which didn't really do much but break up the lines a little bit. One lancer squeezed through our lines pursuing a skirmisher and that caused us a bit of grief to counter. On our left, our foot engaged the archers and legio units and broke them after a hard fight which took a bit longer than I hoped. We lost some units as well to the intervention of some neighboring lancers which delayed efforts to pursue. This proved costly as two of the four rallied shortly, one fully, and that later one returned to plague us and cost us another couple of units. We did manage to scrape together troops to finish both of these off, again. In the center, the returning lancers flanked a couple of our units, breaking them, but likewise, a couple of long running melees againt lancers finally broke in our favor and we just edged by the Byzantines, who would've undoubtedly broken us as well if they'd managed to survive one more turn.
The final view of the field.
Karvon (Roman 24 BC–196 AD with Jewish 64 BC–6 AD allies) defeated Schweetness101 - (Byzantine 551-578 AD) 60-59 for a 3-1 win.
(3-1)
We looked with a bit of despair at what essentially was a large plain with a single large forest towards the left of our center but well on the Byzantine side of the field. The legion tightened their chin straps in anticipation of a very long and hard day. We deployed most of our legion in simple checkerboard with auxiliaries on the wings and our horse in reserve. A few light foot screened our line. The Byzantines deployed a long line of horse; lancers formed the bulk of the line making up the center and right, with a fair number of horse archers on the left. A small body of foot, a couple of legio and archer units were on their right anchored on the woods. they were screened by a handful of light foot. Our plan was to advance our line so the woods would shield our left and refuse our right in hopes of delaying the expected Byzantine attempt to envelop us.
Both armies advanced to contact; initially, the Byzantine lancers essentially pinned the bulk of our line while the battle developed on the flanks. On our right the Byzantine horse archers attempted to flank us, and we countered by committing our reserve horse and aggressively chasing them off with support from some of our medium and light foot. We traded losses here, but blocked the envelopment attempt. In the center, we suffered some casualties to shooting and made a few risky attempts to drive back the lancers which didn't really do much but break up the lines a little bit. One lancer squeezed through our lines pursuing a skirmisher and that caused us a bit of grief to counter. On our left, our foot engaged the archers and legio units and broke them after a hard fight which took a bit longer than I hoped. We lost some units as well to the intervention of some neighboring lancers which delayed efforts to pursue. This proved costly as two of the four rallied shortly, one fully, and that later one returned to plague us and cost us another couple of units. We did manage to scrape together troops to finish both of these off, again. In the center, the returning lancers flanked a couple of our units, breaking them, but likewise, a couple of long running melees againt lancers finally broke in our favor and we just edged by the Byzantines, who would've undoubtedly broken us as well if they'd managed to survive one more turn.
The final view of the field.
- Attachments
-
- 2020-06-14 Romans vs Byzantines.jpg (955.38 KiB) Viewed 1766 times
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division E
kraff (Seleucid 124-63 BC) defeated rs2excelsior (Ptolemaic 55-30 BC) 40-10
Thank you for the battle, rs2excelsior!
kraff (Seleucid 124-63 BC) defeated rs2excelsior (Ptolemaic 55-30 BC) 40-10
Thank you for the battle, rs2excelsior!
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div D
Garokan Arab (Bedouin) 300-636 AD with Byzantine 579-599 AD
challenges
Rob123 - Roman 379-424 AD with Armenian 253-476 AD allies
pw robroman
pm sent
Garokan Arab (Bedouin) 300-636 AD with Byzantine 579-599 AD
challenges
Rob123 - Roman 379-424 AD with Armenian 253-476 AD allies
pw robroman
pm sent
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div D
Garokan Arab (Bedouin) 300-636 AD with Byzantine 579-599 AD
challenges
Barrold713 - Roman 425-492 AD with Frankish 260-495 AD allies
pw barrold
pm sent
Garokan Arab (Bedouin) 300-636 AD with Byzantine 579-599 AD
challenges
Barrold713 - Roman 425-492 AD with Frankish 260-495 AD allies
pw barrold
pm sent
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Div C
Garokan - Polish 966-1057 AD with Rus 860-959 AD allies
challenges
sunnyboy - Scots 851-1051 AD with Viking 790-899 AD allies
pw scotty
pm sent
Garokan - Polish 966-1057 AD with Rus 860-959 AD allies
challenges
sunnyboy - Scots 851-1051 AD with Viking 790-899 AD allies
pw scotty
pm sent
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Div C
Garokan - Polish 966-1057 AD with Rus 860-959 AD allies
challenges
rexhurley - Hindu North 600-1049AD
pw king
pm sent
Garokan - Polish 966-1057 AD with Rus 860-959 AD allies
challenges
rexhurley - Hindu North 600-1049AD
pw king
pm sent
-
ulysisgrunt
- Colonel - Fallschirmjäger

- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:59 pm
- Location: The California Central Coast Wine Country
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
nicely done!
-
General Shapur
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL

- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:25 pm
- Location: Perth, Australia
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division D
General Shapur Dailami 928-1055 AD with Armenian 885-1045 AD allies defeats rs2excelsior Viking (Ireland) 900-1049 AD with Scots 851-1051 AD allies 43:16
Great game - decisive cavalry charge rolled up the line.
General Shapur Dailami 928-1055 AD with Armenian 885-1045 AD allies defeats rs2excelsior Viking (Ireland) 900-1049 AD with Scots 851-1051 AD allies 43:16
Great game - decisive cavalry charge rolled up the line.
Previously - Pete AU (SSG)
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division D
Swuul (British 600-1030 AD with Viking 780-899 AD allies) beat rs2excelsior (Viking, Ireland 900-1049 AD with Scots 851-1051 AD allies) 42-15
A map with an impassable river cutting off a fifth of the map on the left, and a small pond further narrowing the front. The center was dominated by a large but low hill, behind which (on the Viking side) was a large forest. The armies presented just about every possible units roaming in Britain during the early medieval; vikings, brythons, irish, picts, scots, anglo-saxons. This was also the first battle of this season in which my british didn't have numerical superiority (the vikings had 17277 men while the british brought 17238). The vikings hid their irish and pict allies in the forest, and did let the british take the large hill mostly without combat, though on the leftern side of the hill (seen from the British side) the vikings took a stand. However, the british skirmishers first unleashed their volleys on the viking, and then the british hordes swamped vikings on the hill and next to the pond, while the brythonic infantry and some more british spearmen stared down on the irish and picts in the woods (who, even though having numerical superiority against the british holding them in check, could not charge out of the woods uphill and expect to survive against the british defensive spearmen). Left of the pond the british cavalry together with some raw spearmen managed to hold the line and tie down viking units from reinforcing the center.
Thank you for the game rs2excelsior, it started as a nailbiter, and some spectacular scenes when the shield-walls clashed in the center (too bad I didn't take a screenshot of that), until the british dogpile began in earnest.
Screenshot of the final situaion: https://i.imgur.com/hITLi7X.jpg
Swuul (British 600-1030 AD with Viking 780-899 AD allies) beat rs2excelsior (Viking, Ireland 900-1049 AD with Scots 851-1051 AD allies) 42-15
A map with an impassable river cutting off a fifth of the map on the left, and a small pond further narrowing the front. The center was dominated by a large but low hill, behind which (on the Viking side) was a large forest. The armies presented just about every possible units roaming in Britain during the early medieval; vikings, brythons, irish, picts, scots, anglo-saxons. This was also the first battle of this season in which my british didn't have numerical superiority (the vikings had 17277 men while the british brought 17238). The vikings hid their irish and pict allies in the forest, and did let the british take the large hill mostly without combat, though on the leftern side of the hill (seen from the British side) the vikings took a stand. However, the british skirmishers first unleashed their volleys on the viking, and then the british hordes swamped vikings on the hill and next to the pond, while the brythonic infantry and some more british spearmen stared down on the irish and picts in the woods (who, even though having numerical superiority against the british holding them in check, could not charge out of the woods uphill and expect to survive against the british defensive spearmen). Left of the pond the british cavalry together with some raw spearmen managed to hold the line and tie down viking units from reinforcing the center.
Thank you for the game rs2excelsior, it started as a nailbiter, and some spectacular scenes when the shield-walls clashed in the center (too bad I didn't take a screenshot of that), until the british dogpile began in earnest.
Screenshot of the final situaion: https://i.imgur.com/hITLi7X.jpg
Last edited by Swuul on Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
There are three kinds of people, those who can count and those who can't.
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
IMC - French 888-1049 AD with Viking 900-1049 AD allies has beaten SpeedyCM - Dailami 928-1055 AD with Armenian 885-1045 AD allies Score: 66% to 57%
A miracle happened for the French in the end with multiple auto-breaks and routs in the last turn. Should have been a draw.
Thanks for the game.
Ian
(3-1)
IMC - French 888-1049 AD with Viking 900-1049 AD allies has beaten SpeedyCM - Dailami 928-1055 AD with Armenian 885-1045 AD allies Score: 66% to 57%
A miracle happened for the French in the end with multiple auto-breaks and routs in the last turn. Should have been a draw.
Thanks for the game.
Ian
(3-1)
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
-
baldrick52
- Senior Corporal - Ju 87G

- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 4:51 pm
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
baldrick52 - Kyrenean Greek 630-461 BC beats rs2excelsior - Carthaginian 550-411 BC with Greek, Western 460-381 BC allies 60% - 45%
Very bloody game!
baldrick52 - Kyrenean Greek 630-461 BC beats rs2excelsior - Carthaginian 550-411 BC with Greek, Western 460-381 BC allies 60% - 45%
Very bloody game!
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Tournament Diary and News . . .
Macedonczyk has won the 2020 KO Tournament decisively beating klayeckles in the final. For details of this game go to . . . viewtopic.php?f=511&t=99524
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division F
hscic - Palmyran 258-273 AD
challenges
Conteshard - Roman 24BC-196AD with Arab 312BC-199AD allies
PM sent
PW = reverte
hscic - Palmyran 258-273 AD
challenges
Conteshard - Roman 24BC-196AD with Arab 312BC-199AD allies
PM sent
PW = reverte
-
batesmotel
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 3616
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
batesmotel (Bosporan w Roman allies) beat Gdod (Byzantine) 61-51
Thanks for a good game. The Bosporan cavalry in the end managed to kill a bit more than the Byzantine dismounted lancers.
Chris
(3-1)
batesmotel (Bosporan w Roman allies) beat Gdod (Byzantine) 61-51
Thanks for a good game. The Bosporan cavalry in the end managed to kill a bit more than the Byzantine dismounted lancers.
Chris
(3-1)
....where life is beautiful all the time
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div F
Warg1 – Arab, City 300-633 AD challenges hyme - Alan 25-650 AD
pm sent
Warg1 – Arab, City 300-633 AD challenges hyme - Alan 25-650 AD
pm sent
Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .
Group B
harveylh (Slav 500-832 AD, no allies) defeats Cunningcairn (Avar 558-631, no allies), 42-16
Closer than the score indicates. GG.
harveylh (Slav 500-832 AD, no allies) defeats Cunningcairn (Avar 558-631, no allies), 42-16
Closer than the score indicates. GG.
We should all Stand With Ukraine.

-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm






