Strategos rules and map

krieg63 · Post by **krieg63** » Thu May 27, 2010 1:32 am

gazxtrix wrote:Under the furniture!!!

Are we supposed to have FOW on or off. I assume off, obviously.

Cheers

Can we have a ruling Guillame

normally it must be with FOW.
unless you have a good reason

gazxtrix · Post by **gazxtrix** » Thu May 27, 2010 1:33 am

Ok

Mousy I will reissue challenge.

Sorry for inconvenience.

TheGrayMouser · Post by **TheGrayMouser** » Thu May 27, 2010 1:53 am

gazxtrix wrote:Ok

Mousy I will reissue challenge.

Sorry for inconvenience.

Now ya tell me, just sent my ist turn! Actually whatever way you want to do it, keep the ist one or do the second challenge, I''ll leave up to you! (the very good reason would be its the ist battle in beginning of campaign and no-one knows what we are are doing yet

gazxtrix · Post by **gazxtrix** » Thu May 27, 2010 1:54 am

Ok Sounds good .

I will continue with original battle.

Cheers

krieg63 · Post by **krieg63** » Thu May 27, 2010 2:03 am

TheGrayMouser wrote:
gazxtrix wrote:Ok

Mousy I will reissue challenge.

Sorry for inconvenience.
Now ya tell me, just sent my ist turn! Actually whatever way you want to do it, keep the ist one or do the second challenge, I''ll leave up to you! (the very good reason would be its the ist battle in beginning of campaign and no-one knows what we are are doing yet

no problem if you have already started a battle with no fow

TheGrayMouser · Post by **TheGrayMouser** » Sat May 29, 2010 6:00 pm

Billgber, just to clarify what allies , if any, can Celti Low and Celti High take?

krieg63 · Post by **krieg63** » Sat May 29, 2010 6:28 pm

TheGrayMouser wrote:Billgber, just to clarify what allies , if any, can Celti Low and Celti High take?

there is only one rulle: closer you are, lower are the chance to become allied
see the allied chart

Blathergut · Post by **Blathergut** » Sat May 29, 2010 10:53 pm

So do provinces with armies (like Illyria where it's army is) have a garrison pop up there or do they have to spend a turn making the garrison?

Why didn't Carthage and Egypt gain new armies? Because once they refilled from casualties they had less than 600pts available???

Blathergut · Post by **Blathergut** » Sat May 29, 2010 10:58 pm

Do we do all alliances over? Is there any benefit to being allied last turn with a faction and trying again this turn? Or if I was allied, do I stay allied, and am only trying for new ones now?

Blathergut · Post by **Blathergut** » Sat May 29, 2010 11:23 pm

Oiii..tries to remember who he's allied with!!!

Blathergut · Post by **Blathergut** » Sat May 29, 2010 11:50 pm

Epirus didn't get a 2nd army because their first one was still sitting in the capital, right? Same with Britain?

Blathergut · Post by **Blathergut** » Sat May 29, 2010 11:55 pm

Actually...this is getting interesting.

Take Carthage:

Since it didn't get a new army, it's in a bit of a pickle. If Ptolemy attacks him again and hurts him enough, no 2nd army next turn. If Rome attacked this turn as well, that would ensure no second army, even if the Romans retreated afterwards. Hmmmm....so how does Carthage avoid the attacks? Prays to all the gods for an alliance with Ptolemy and Rome? There must be some negative mod for being at war??

Blathergut · Post by **Blathergut** » Sat May 29, 2010 11:57 pm

Why no Seleucid garrison in Elymaia??

gazxtrix · Post by **gazxtrix** » Sun May 30, 2010 12:11 am

Why does macedonia not receive an extra army?

Losses in battle where less than 20%.

Blathergut · Post by **Blathergut** » Sun May 30, 2010 12:38 am

I think losses must have cost more than 200....that left 599 or less...therefore no new 600pt army.

gazxtrix · Post by **gazxtrix** » Sun May 30, 2010 4:18 am

If casualties are the means of measuring then 9890 from 58500 is 16% lost, which translates to approx 96pts lost.

with a top up factor of 1.2 this brings the army back up to 600+ pts.

All income should be available for a new army.

At least that is how I thought it was going to be.

Can I have some clarification please.

Gary

Ironclad · Post by **Ironclad** » Sun May 30, 2010 7:39 am

Blathergut wrote:Why no Seleucid garrison in Elymaia??

Good question. Must admit I didn't know thay formed so quickly or that you have to order one in advance (if thats the reason).

krieg63 · Post by **krieg63** » Sun May 30, 2010 2:22 pm

Ironclad wrote:
Blathergut wrote:Why no Seleucid garrison in Elymaia??
Good question. Must admit I didn't know thay formed so quickly or that you have to order one in advance (if thats the reason).

my mistake

krieg63 · Post by **krieg63** » Sun May 30, 2010 2:23 pm

gazxtrix wrote:If casualties are the means of measuring then 9890 from 58500 is 16% lost, which translates to approx 96pts lost.

with a top up factor of 1.2 this brings the army back up to 600+ pts.

All income should be available for a new army.

At least that is how I thought it was going to be.

Can I have some clarification please.

Gary

you are right; after verification Macedonia Bosporan and Ptolemaic get a new army; see campaign for explanation.

krieg63 · Post by **krieg63** » Sun May 30, 2010 2:41 pm

Blathergut wrote:Actually...this is getting interesting.

Take Carthage:

Since it didn't get a new army, it's in a bit of a pickle. If Ptolemy attacks him again and hurts him enough, no 2nd army next turn. If Rome attacked this turn as well, that would ensure no second army, even if the Romans retreated afterwards. Hmmmm....so how does Carthage avoid the attacks? Prays to all the gods for an alliance with Ptolemy and Rome? There must be some negative mod for being at war??

Rome could not attack Carthage this turn.
anyway you allays have reserve army in capital