You should have 6 points. 4+1+1MorkinTheFree wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2019 11:49 pmShouldn't I have 4 points instead of 5? One marginal defeat and one victory?
To avoid confusion - now, after three games, one vicory and two marginal defeats I think I should have 5 points...
The Dustbin
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:56 pm
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
just realized victory gets 4 pts, not 3... deleted post, thnksCunningcairn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2019 12:00 amYou should have 6 points. 4+1+1MorkinTheFree wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2019 11:49 pmShouldn't I have 4 points instead of 5? One marginal defeat and one victory?
To avoid confusion - now, after three games, one vicory and two marginal defeats I think I should have 5 points...
-
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:51 am
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
I have to say, I ran across this league at the end of the last season and eagerly read all of the battle reports from you and others who took the time to describe the battle they fought. I loved what was essentially a massive collection of battle reports, and have attempted to put as much detail into my (alarmingly few!) reports on these threads myself.Geffalrus wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:57 pmNon-professionally. I find it's a good way to add extra spice to things I enjoy.........like gaming and ancient history. These matches can be crazy fun, and I feel compelled to share the twists and turns.
Fate is a fickle mistress - that much we all know. I'm smart enough to know that I should always, ALWAYS have some light cav available to deal with such things. And yet, they always get caught up elsewhere. You're very capable skirmishing saw to that.![]()
-
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 6:12 am
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division D
Schweetness101 - Arab (Abbasid) 874-946 AD defeated bomber23 - Moravian 833-907 AD with German ally: 53-20
Split by a large hill in the middle, the battle ended up as an infantry clash on the right, and a mostly cavalry one on the left, while bomber took the hill. Bomber123 had a few good flanks and breaks early on, and I thought he had me for the first half of the battle, but the greater number of Arab cavalry, in tandem with massed archers and spearmen, overcame early setbacks against the Moravian/German lancers, and the Moravian lack of medium foot was a liability in some rough terrain.
gg bomber23
Schweetness101 - Arab (Abbasid) 874-946 AD defeated bomber23 - Moravian 833-907 AD with German ally: 53-20
Split by a large hill in the middle, the battle ended up as an infantry clash on the right, and a mostly cavalry one on the left, while bomber took the hill. Bomber123 had a few good flanks and breaks early on, and I thought he had me for the first half of the battle, but the greater number of Arab cavalry, in tandem with massed archers and spearmen, overcame early setbacks against the Moravian/German lancers, and the Moravian lack of medium foot was a liability in some rough terrain.
gg bomber23
My Mods:
Ancient Greek https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=977908#p977908
Dark Ages Britain https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=106417
Anarchy (Medieval) https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=987488#p987488
Ancient Greek https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=977908#p977908
Dark Ages Britain https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=106417
Anarchy (Medieval) https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=987488#p987488
-
- Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 5:49 pm
- Location: Greece
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
There is a mistake Mike. Your army is Ancient British 60-80 AD with Roman 24-196 AD ally. You must create the game again in the lobby.MikeMarchant wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2019 7:20 pm Division D
Challenge up:
MikeMarchant (Ghaznavid 962-1187 CE - Allies: Turkish) challenges GeneralKostas (Frankish 496-599 AD with Breton 411-579 AD ally) - Password: SPQR - PM sent
Best of luck, General.
Best Wishes
Mike
-
- Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
- Posts: 1842
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 4:26 am
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division C
GDod - Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD challenges Karvon - Germanic/Gothic Horse Tribes 260-492 AD with Dacian (Carpi) 107-380 AD ally
GDod - Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD challenges lydianed - Byzantine 551-578 AD
GDod - Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD challenges MorkinTheFree - Romano-British 407-599 AD
PM sent password = gdod
GDod - Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD challenges Karvon - Germanic/Gothic Horse Tribes 260-492 AD with Dacian (Carpi) 107-380 AD ally
GDod - Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD challenges lydianed - Byzantine 551-578 AD
GDod - Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD challenges MorkinTheFree - Romano-British 407-599 AD
PM sent password = gdod
"La guerre ne détermine pas qui a raison, mais qui reste" - Bertrand Russell
-
- Field of Glory 2
- Posts: 28297
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: Early Middle Ages; arrange your matches here . . .
Division B
rbodleyscott (Arab Conquest 638-)
challenges set up for:
batesmotel (Khorasanian + Dailami)
devoncop (Byzantine 988- and Georgian)
General Shapur (Arab Conquest 629-637)
Nijis (Byzantine 963-)
PW: disaster
PM sent
rbodleyscott (Arab Conquest 638-)
challenges set up for:
batesmotel (Khorasanian + Dailami)
devoncop (Byzantine 988- and Georgian)
General Shapur (Arab Conquest 629-637)
Nijis (Byzantine 963-)
PW: disaster
PM sent
Richard Bodley Scott


-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:46 pm
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
GeneralKostas wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2019 7:06 amThere is a mistake Mike. Your army is Ancient British 60-80 AD with Roman 24-196 AD ally. You must create the game again in the lobby.MikeMarchant wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2019 7:20 pm Division D
Challenge up:
MikeMarchant (Ghaznavid 962-1187 CE - Allies: Turkish) challenges GeneralKostas (Frankish 496-599 AD with Breton 411-579 AD ally) - Password: SPQR - PM sent
Best of luck, General.
Best Wishes
Mike
Sorry, the mistake was in the wording of the challenge. The battle was set up correctly.
Best Wishes
Mike
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:07 pm
- Location: Hamble, UK
- Contact:
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Div B
paulmcneil Thracians beat Barrold713 Boiotian 46:8
paulmcneil Thracians beat Barrold713 Boiotian 46:8
Paul McNeil
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
-
- Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Virginia, USA
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Glad you've enjoyed it!rs2excelsior wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2019 1:18 am I have to say, I ran across this league at the end of the last season and eagerly read all of the battle reports from you and others who took the time to describe the battle they fought. I loved what was essentially a massive collection of battle reports, and have attempted to put as much detail into my (alarmingly few!) reports on these threads myself.

I think I was originally inspired by campaign reports I'd read on the forums for the Europa Barbarorum mods for Rome Total War and Medieval 2 TW. It's always a sign of a good gaming experience when people can write a good narrative of what transpired.
We should all Stand With Ukraine.

-
- 2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
- Posts: 715
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:28 pm
- Location: Delaware, USA
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
edb1815 (Thracian) defeated MikeMarchant (Seleucid) 41% - 13%
Thanks to my opponent for reminding me to post the result!
edb1815 (Thracian) defeated MikeMarchant (Seleucid) 41% - 13%
Thanks to my opponent for reminding me to post the result!

-
- 2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
- Posts: 715
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:28 pm
- Location: Delaware, USA
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
edb1815 (Thracian) draws with Karvon (Sarmatian) 30%-29%
The terrain with bits woods on the flanks and bits of rough terrain and trees scattered about did not favor the Sarmatian lancers. The Sarmatians won the skirmisher battle and advanced finding the Thracian center held by Antigonid allied heavy infantry and an elephant which caused some havoc. The Sarmatians then withdrew to the more open side of the field and more desultory combat occurred (Both sides trying to get at least to the 20% threshold) as night fell on the battlefield. Well played by Karvon.
(2-2)
edb1815 (Thracian) draws with Karvon (Sarmatian) 30%-29%
The terrain with bits woods on the flanks and bits of rough terrain and trees scattered about did not favor the Sarmatian lancers. The Sarmatians won the skirmisher battle and advanced finding the Thracian center held by Antigonid allied heavy infantry and an elephant which caused some havoc. The Sarmatians then withdrew to the more open side of the field and more desultory combat occurred (Both sides trying to get at least to the 20% threshold) as night fell on the battlefield. Well played by Karvon.
(2-2)
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
young (Italian Hill Tribes) defeated sennacherib (Pergamene) 64-45
Cheers
Richard
young (Italian Hill Tribes) defeated sennacherib (Pergamene) 64-45
Cheers
Richard
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Div A
Cunningcairn - Ptolemaic 55-30 BC with Roman 105-25 BC ally beat XLegione - Samnite 355-272 BC with Gallic 300-101 BC ally Won 72% to 52%
Probably the closest battle I have ever played. Both armies were completely spent and in the last few rounds both of us went to the brink of breaking and back again. I think going into the last round it was 54% to 52%. Another great contest XLegione! Thanks for the game.
(3-1)
Cunningcairn - Ptolemaic 55-30 BC with Roman 105-25 BC ally beat XLegione - Samnite 355-272 BC with Gallic 300-101 BC ally Won 72% to 52%
Probably the closest battle I have ever played. Both armies were completely spent and in the last few rounds both of us went to the brink of breaking and back again. I think going into the last round it was 54% to 52%. Another great contest XLegione! Thanks for the game.
(3-1)
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div A
Cunningcairn - Ptolemaic 55-30 BC with Roman 105-25 BC ally
Challenges
Snugglebunnies - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC PW is your username in lower case
PM sent
Cunningcairn - Ptolemaic 55-30 BC with Roman 105-25 BC ally
Challenges
Snugglebunnies - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC PW is your username in lower case
PM sent
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div D
cromlechi - Egyptian 405-343 BC challenges KiFi - Macedonian 320-261 BC with Greek ally pass = KiFi PM sent
cromlechi - Egyptian 405-343 BC challenges KiFi - Macedonian 320-261 BC with Greek ally pass = KiFi PM sent