Good job! :)

Just played the Macedonians vs Indians starter scenario. Everything went ok, with no crashes during the gameplay (although FoG crashed when I tried to exit from the main menu, after I finished playing the scenario). After a long time without playing FoG, I don't remember the rules at ...

Out of curiosity (because I'm not really interested in this expansion :)) - should I expect an ETE key?

I got a key when one of my scenarios was included in a previous expansion. Now it looks like ETE includes another two (Lucena and Cocherel*), so...?


---
* I actually don't know if these are my ...

admin wrote:Slitherine may have lost the field, but have certainly won the battle!

Well done!

I installed the 1.6.0 comprehensive patch from matrix on top of my FOG install (which already was at 1.6.0, patched using the in-game updater) and still get the error on starting the DAG...

I have all expansions except ETE and LTR, running Win7 64 in spanish. I didn't participate in the ETE beta ...

I'm also getting the 'commader bodyguard name ... is duplicated' error in some DAG lists.

First noticed it in SAS' Later Crusader (Richard I) list, but I just checked and it's also happening in ROR's Late Republican(Brutus & Cassius).

Running 1.6.0, with all expansions except LTR and ETE.

So how much work is there to do? Do you already have a translation and want us to check it (like in BA) or is it a "start from scratch" job?

Glad to know this has been useful! I look forward to the update

So, what's the status of the Spanish translation? Have the reported bugs been fixed? Should we continue looking for more? Is there any deadline?

* Unit description: British & US engineers: "carga satchel" -> "carga de demolición "

* Unit description: British & German & US infantry: "granadas antipersonales" -> "granadas antipersonal "

* Unit description: Universal carrier: "El ejército británico empleó el universal carrier" -> put ...

* Editor (first window): text untranslated: "make this a carryover campaign". I guess a "carryover campaing" is campaign where you keep units from one scenario to the next?. In that case I suggest "conservar unidades entre escenarios" ("keep units from one scenario to the next")

* Editor (first ...

* Unit description: 6 pdr AT: "con mayores capacidades de penetración" -> "con mayor capacidad de penetración"

* Unit description: Vickers: "o la cadencia de tiro" -> "o la alta cadencia de tiro"

* Unit description: Sherman M4: "fueron aventajados" -> "fueron superados "

* Unit description: King ...

* Battle: text untranslated: "reverse". I suggest "marcha atrás"

* Battle: looking at the text1_SPA file, it seems like the word "derrumbado" has been used to translate "break down". If you're referring to something like an engine problem, the correct translation is "averiado" ("derrumbado" means ...

A few more (note I'm using the 1st April beta, although I think it does not make any difference for the spanish translation):

* In the very first screen that pops up when you start the game (the one where you can pick the screen resolution and the shadow quality), everything is translated to ...

The Spanish translation is quite good :D Just a few mistakes so far:

* In the battle map, when you hover over the turn (change facing) icon, the tool tip reads "turno". It should be "girar".

* Also in the battle map, on the left corner there is usually an objective with the text "mate al menos XX ...

Regarding AI troop selection and deployment, I know of a few games which rely on a "database of human actions" to make similar decisions.

Thus, you could create a database of human-created armies and deployments used in multiplayer DAG games (probably sorted by some kind of score based on its ...

I suggest something between the current scenarios and a full campaign: scenarios with resources, like in Battle for Wesnoth or Panzer General.

Just make a scenario with a big map and locations which provide points each turn to the side that controls them, and allow the players to spend those points ...

Sure, I will re-upload the file this afternoon after work.

I will also send it to KMS, although I was under the impression that he had updated the unit images (I can't check because I don't have LTR)

Edit: I have uploaded the "RoR version" of the Parthian river crossing scenario to depositfiles ...

I think you will find that these figures have been borrowed from the “Swords & Scimitars” folder.

Yeah, that's also what I think.

I'm not interested (at least not too much...) in SAS, so I was just wondering if the devs had considered adding the figures to the SOA folder of the scenario editor.

In the latest patches the DAG figures of SOA's Later Granadines have been updated.

However, these figures are not available in the SOA folder of the scenario editor (I guess they are only in the SAS folder).

Are there any plans to add these new figures to the SOA folder of the scenario editor ...

Let me add a couple of quotes from Phil Barker's superb "Armies and Enemies of Imperial Rome":

* Battle of Orontes 272 A.D.:
Aurelian with a large Roman army strong in light cavalry faced a Palmyran army, probably including the remains of the Roman army of the east with at least two Legiones ...