Hi, I am playing against Schnurri. Me playing the Allies. It is spring '44 and Russia has conquered Hungary and Romania. Last turn I captured Sofia and when the turn ended I got the message that Bulgaria join the Allies. So far so good. What puzzled me was the next message which was that Turkey joi...

Hi, I am playing against Schnurri. Me playing the Allies. It is spring '44 and Russia has conquered Hungary and Romania. Last turn I captured Sofia and when the turn ended I got the message that Bulgaria join the Allies. So far so good. What puzzled me was the next message which was that Turkey join...

In my game (me allies) against Schnurri, we discovered something weird regarding the Italian surrender. I had captured, Tunis, Tripoli and Cagliari. I landed a PARA in northern Italy and captured Turin. A second PARA landed in Reggio and captured the rail depot in order to cut off the Sicilian defen...

Ahh, thanks for the clarification. Another lessoned learned todat

Hi, In my current game as allies against DukeOfLight (RC7 version) we experienced something which seems like a bug. The current rule for amphibious range states: 204. Amphibious range is now equal to 6 + surface ships tech instead of a fixed range of 10. My UK ship tech is at 3. So my UK amph range ...

I'm 39.

I cannot see the RC5 file for the PC, only the MAC file (Mac-CEAW Grand Strategy-v210RC5.zip) on the ftp server.

Did somebody forget to put the PC file onto the server

Thanks for the clarification

Hi, Me and my opponent have encountered something strange when playing with version RC4. I am using Windows and my opponent is using a MAC. We have both confirmed that we are using RC4, but still we get the following message: http://i669.photobucket.com/albums/vv59/Panzer_General1972/CEAW%20GS%2020%...

peterjfrigate wrote:Not sure. I've seen it and assumed it was a feature not a bug - since you can deny the landing, you can help the AI not waste all its PPs by exceeding its invasion capacity.

That sounds reasonable.

Hello, I am playing GS 2.01.34 as the axis against the allied AI. The AI performs its usual landing in France in the summer of 1942. As the axis player I am really surprised when I get the following messages when UK an US forces perform their amphibious landing. http://i669.photobucket.com/albums/vv...

While we are trying to tie down the game balance to release the game patch before Christmas, I do not see how we can get enough games to determine game balance with a new twist to the Russian PP's points. To determine good balance, I know that I will not get a v2.01.35 game to the end in 30 days. S...

I vote for D.

I vote for c.

1 c
2 a
3 a
4 c
5 a

I agree with zechi. The cost is right from my viewpoint.

I vote a.

I reloaded the turn, and it is severe winter in northern Russia. Which explains no efficency loss for the Russians.

Stauffenberg wrote:This is a bug that is fixed in the next patch, GS v2.01. If you use unit swap the flag wasn't set to hidden.

Ahh, thanks for the clarification

Hi, I am playing a GS 2.0 PBEM game against zechi (allies). The sitzkrieg season has started but on turn 7 (last turn in 1939) I suddenly spotted the BEF outside my spotting range! As one can see from the screen dump I cannot see the content of any of the hexes surrounding the BEF so in theory I sho...