My thought is that it is still a great game, but there needs to be thought given to how changes in battle outcomes would dictate the war. I'd have no problem with a Moscow wipeout in 41 or 43 ending the war in the East. The basic game has that, and I like it. But I also like the far greater detail i...

Heck, even in the title for the 1943 scenario, it says "following the defeat at Stalingrad." Except that didn't happen in my game. I won 3 decisives. The chronology seems to follow history, but not the game play.

When playing the individual year campaigns, I'm struggling to see how winning or losing really alter the course of the war. In the basic game, continuing to score decisive victories allows you to perform a Sea Lion mission early against the UK or even deliver a decisive blow to kill off the Soviets ...

From a pure prestige point of view a MV is often preferable. Even if you get slightly less prestige as a reward, you have much lower losses to recover as you can simply stop advancing and/or concentrate forces better and/or receive scripted counterattacks in better terrain etc. I habve to admit tho...

I thought you could only save by battle name. I never realized chronological was an option. I'm an IPad player as well.

Damn, that's a good idea. I've got all these stolen units that have no experience and thus of little value to me, and I've never thought about disbanding them before. These are the kind of things I need to learn. Is there a way to drop the fallshirmjaeger via plane? I assume so, but I don't know how...

Hi all... loving the game, but running into my first real problems in 1942. I managed to take Stalingrad by storm despite requiring a lot of prestige to repair my beat up forces. Now I'm on the docks, and after meeting ridiculous resistance taking the last two objectives, I'm considering replaying t...