But, I don't think the Churchill and Jumbo had armor that was that weak. In fact, the tanks that had quite a questionable quality were the late war German panzers. Some even had issues of armor that cracked when hit by enemy shells.

So I've just found a post that accurately displays the supposed "effective" armor of tanks with the slopes taken into consideration. Many tanks in game arent properly armored, some have too much armor i.e. Tiger while some have too few i.e. Churchill, Jumbo. http://forum.worldoftanks.com/i...

So I have been playing this campaign for a while (but not all maps yet) so I've got some feedback. The campaign against the Russians is absolutely superb! It is very interesting and cool to fight against other Allied vehicles. About the British campaign in 1940, perhaps you should add some Matildas ...

Awesome maps. Well done!

Ok then, that's quite nice.

What's the catch and terms? Are there any fees or requirements that a person needs to do in order to become a beta-tester?

I found a glitch on the map Targnon. I could'nt post the screenshot as the game says that the file is too big so I'll just say it. Near the train station on the road, part of its says that theres a hill and a raised road even though the road is flat and not a hll which makes the unit look like its f...

Please add more AT guns in the Stoumont Assualt as 50 cal machine guns simply wont do against german panzers and maybe put less infantry.

Nice.....nice.........

But then the game values make the German tanks seem a little bit overpowered for what theyreally were and the 17 pdr should really be strong enough to really pen a panzer IV, not just bounce off and get destroyed by your intended target. It seems to me that the 17 pdr only has the same penetration a...

I would like to specify a few problems(I think) abot the tanks in the game.(Although some may be mistaken. Please feel free to correct it.) 1.) Armor The King Tiger in real life only had 80 mm for its side and rear amor. The Tiger I had 100 mm of frontal armor not 130. The panzer IV was less armored...

Nice map although the ultra close combat is a bit annoying. Nice job on the pershing although may I request that you increase the roof armor of the pershing from 8 as 8 is too thin. Also, please improve its HE capabilities to be similar to the HE attack of the tiger. I would also like to say the the...

Well, I have more comments for the scenarios. For the lanzerath ridge, I think that the US soldiers there should only have one US jeep. For the Bucholz, I think it is already good. For the bullingen fuel depot, I think that the US side is too strong and the engineers have super powerful guns. The SS...

Hello, I have a rant about the stavelot scenario. I think that the germans receive too much artillery support like the wespes and the stuka zu fub.

Sorry for the mistake, I do have the US mortars but I don't have the others I previously mentioned

Sure. I have a suggestion though, how about using some of the 76mm AT guns from the new Fortress Metz

I don't know if my version is old but mine is Secure the Bridges Version 2.0 and my version doesn't have any engineer tanks or 81mm mortars for the Americans or shermans fitted with rockets or the brandenburger jeep and infantry can ride the mortar halftracks. Just sayin' to see if my version is the...

I think that there are too many light fortifications and heavy fortifications on the beach even though they are not needed.

This map is great.

When will the others be ready