Search found 63 matches
- Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:58 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Rules Variant: Attack from the March (Partial Deployment)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1666
Exactly. The abrupt piling on of forces during a ambush could occur via meeting engagement rules. The Battle of the Teutoburg Forest (described as clades Variana by Roman historians) took place in A.D. 9 (probably lasting from September 9 to September 11) when an alliance of Germanic tribes led by A...
- Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:49 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Probably grinding an old ax: Compatibility of movement rates
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6197
My concern is that CV and Kn are being penalized with movement rates that are too low relative to Foot. Those low movement rates seem to limit the capability of CV/Kn units to move about the area of play. Remember the history ... War horses of various capabilities were bred for 1000s of years. For s...
- Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:22 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Rules Variant: Attack from the March (Partial Deployment)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1666
I have looked at a number of historical battles over time. Not all battles were set-piece affairs, where everyone could neatly line up. Meeting engagements and attacks from the march occurred. For example, at bridges, road junctions, ambush sites or when one force unknowingly reveals its location to...
- Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:04 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Probably grinding an old ax: Compatibility of movement rates
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6197
So—as modeled by the current rules—humans on foot are always as fast as humans mounted on horses? And Mounted are not allowed to fully employ the additional movement that horses provide? Indeed...seems like the Foot units are getting a little too much help from the rules. I rather like Nik's ideal w...
- Fri Jul 24, 2009 5:55 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Rules Variant: Attack from the March (Partial Deployment)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1666
Rules Variant: Attack from the March (Partial Deployment)
I have been experimenting with some rules mods which allow dynamic meeting engagements/attacks from the march, and which also break the "set-piece" battle paradigm which the Field of Glory rules seem locked into. The rules variations are simple, and open up many dynamic tactical situations...
- Fri Jul 24, 2009 5:22 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Probably grinding an old ax: Compatibility of movement rates
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6197
Probably grinding an old ax: Compatibility of movement rates
I have never understood the seeming discrepancy between foot and mounted movement rates in "Open" terrain. Almost all of the Field of Glory unit performance assumptions are OK, but the ones discussed below are problematic. Light, Medium and Heavy Foot move at 5, 4 and 3 MU. That seems reas...
- Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:30 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Up-to-date compilation of rules clarifications, extensions..
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1703
FAQ, as the Errata are typo corrections. There are many more FoG Team rulings answered on the Forum than those on the FAQ webpage/.pdf. How are those captured for posterity? ============================================== And to stay on point on a related matter... Often for a rules dispute during pl...
- Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:22 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Up-to-date compilation of rules clarifications, extensions..
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1703
Up-to-date compilation of rules clarifications, extensions..
There appears to be no up-to-date organized set of FoG "Rule Book Authors"/Rule Givers-provided guidance, rulings and clarifications about FoG rule conflicts, revisions, sticky points, and unforeseen situations [e.g., the legality rolling for unplanned flank attacks to confuse one's oppone...
- Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:46 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Number of troops/fighters in a BG?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3345
Sorry, I meant to say 250 soldiers in a BASE. Mind slipped the units so to speak. Regarding missile fire power: A LF or LH bow unit appears to have less effective firepower than a MF or Cav bow unit. In an exchange between LH/LF bow and MF/Cav bow: > LH/LF bow get 1 dice per 2 bases in effective ran...
- Thu Oct 30, 2008 7:21 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Number of troops/fighters in a BG?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3345
Number of troops/fighters in a BG?
The Rules Book says that there are "about" 250 fighters in a BG?
In working up the shooting firepower, charge/impact and melee combat tables and rules, what were the assumptions on the number of troops in the various types of BG:
LF?
MF?
HF?
LH?
CAV?
KN?
CAT?
In working up the shooting firepower, charge/impact and melee combat tables and rules, what were the assumptions on the number of troops in the various types of BG:
LF?
MF?
HF?
LH?
CAV?
KN?
CAT?
- Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:57 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Field of Glory Tactical Tips Collection
- Replies: 35
- Views: 87512
No - Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus or simply Claudius. I was considered a rather unlikely man to become emperor, but despite my lack of political experience, I proved to be an able administrator and a great builder of public works. My reign saw an expansion of the empire, and OBTW the...
- Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:03 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Field of Glory Tactical Tips Collection
- Replies: 35
- Views: 87512
- Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:39 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Bow vs Longbow
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3305
Perhaps these observed effects are due to the way the odds are rather stacked against missile weapons: 1] For scoring hits, where the odds for close combat hits are much better than those for shooting hits. 2] For Death Rolls, +2 on die if shot at [where one loses a base by not rolling higher than t...
- Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:15 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: VIKINGS ??
- Replies: 58
- Views: 17753
- Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:05 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Skirmishers with English HYW and WoTR...
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5162
- Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:19 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Skirmishers with English HYW and WoTR...
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5162
- Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:27 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Skirmishers with English HYW and WoTR...
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5162
Here is a working 800-point WoTR Yorkist Army that offers operational flexibility by having: > Cv, LH and LF BG to protect the flanks or engage skirmishers, or engage threat flanks > Field Fortifications to enable forward placement of the LB and HF units, protect the LB/HF units and/or help block te...
- Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:36 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Skirmishers with English HYW and WoTR...
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5162
- Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:21 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Best Army by Book
- Replies: 44
- Views: 10430
For Storm of Arrows.... #1 Medieval French - 800 points of hoofed fury. or you can add in some Later Medieval Scots [Continental] allies for a bit more HF or MF/Longbow power as needed. #2 100-Year English [Continental] For Swords and Scimitars.... Later Crusaders - teamed with some Syrian States, F...
- Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:19 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Moving through your own camp
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3099