Search found 5 matches

by Shadowfax
Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:15 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Napoleonic Era 1792-1815 : General Discussion
Topic: 1700 to 1762
Replies: 89
Views: 39077

Re: 1700 to 1762

Sorry.. French.
by Shadowfax
Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:14 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Napoleonic Era 1792-1815 : General Discussion
Topic: 1700 to 1762
Replies: 89
Views: 39077

Re: 1700 to 1762

Those Prussians and Austrians look good. 25mm. ?
by Shadowfax
Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:09 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Napoleonic Era 1792-1815 : General Discussion
Topic: 1700 to 1762
Replies: 89
Views: 39077

Re: 1700 to 1762

A wider table, say 5ft. x 6ft. would give a grand tactical movement area away from field pieces and enemy cavalry or a shorter range.

I've not read anything on deployment distance of the time, but I would have thought about 800 yards, dependent on terrain and of course plan, if any.
by Shadowfax
Fri Oct 18, 2013 9:59 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Napoleonic Era 1792-1815 : General Discussion
Topic: 1700 to 1762
Replies: 89
Views: 39077

Re: 1700 to 1762

Quote). A final point, one similarity, in my view, between war in Europe and North America is the importance of depots and supply lines and how these influence when and where battles were fought. So one might one to consider how this would influence the tabletop game. The period cries out for a camp...
by Shadowfax
Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:57 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Napoleonic Era 1792-1815 : General Discussion
Topic: 1700 to 1762
Replies: 89
Views: 39077

Re: 1700 to 1762

Thanks for the heads up, why not make the rules an extension of FOGR? That would allow for the early period and some of the more outlandish units available in North America, India and Middle East? I did ask Richard about Marlborough's wars at Britcon, the year before FoG-R was published. He did say...

Go to advanced search