I would also like to take this opportunity to thank the organizers for the time and dedication they put into this community initiative and to congratulate the three teams sharing the podium, especially the winners. I would also like to join in expressing my heartfelt wishes for a speedy recovery to ...

Match 6
Period 2

MrCrow defeats batesmotel 60-46

Thank for the good game! And thank to the WTC organizers!

recorded

Match 6
Period 2

MrCrow vs batesmotel

Battle created and password sent with PM

I think there is also something wrong with the last match: we Comites have already fought against Lupi Belli

Match n.6

Period 2

MrCrow defeats Conteshard 43-4

recorded

Round 4
Match 6
Period 2

Challenge created for Conteshard. Password sent with PM

Let's begin the civil war. Alea iacta est!

Round 3
Match 7
Period 2

MrCrow defeats Enry1977 with a score of 44-4

Thank you for the battle!

recorded

They are based on Duncan Head's analysis in "Armies of the Macedonian and Punic Wars". I have seen no evidence to overturn his conclusions. I took the liberty of getting the book you mentioned, and I went on to read, for example, the paragraph about the Apuli (a people whose history I kno...

I think a small proportion of impact foot for various Italian lists is totally plausible though I think the same. Lets wait for Richard opinion Which is that I do not believe that there is sufficient justification to make the changes you propose. Thank you, Richard, for participating in this discus...

MATCH 7
Comites Italia 2 vs Lupi Belli

MrCrow vs Enry1977

pm sent to Enry with password

SnuggleBunnies wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2024 4:57 pm I think a small proportion of impact foot for various Italian lists is totally plausible though

I think the same. Lets wait for Richard opinion

As a lot of assunptions made for a considerable amount of other factions, nobody knows if those warriors actually fought using a proper hoplite phalanx. Are we sure for example that the hoplites used by Campanians actually fought using it? Right I mean I don't think the Campanians or the Romans sho...

As a lot of assunptions made for a considerable amount of other factions, nobody knows if those warriors actually fought using a proper hoplite phalanx. Are we sure for example that the hoplites used by Campanians actually fought using it? But Campanians has 12 hoplites in their roster. This is corr...

Exactly three months after the start of the final, here is the result of the second match: MrCrow (Pyrrhic 280-275 BC) draws with principesromanes (Galatian 280-63 BC) 52-54 Therefore, the total score now becomes: MrCrow 108, principesromanes 78. Ironically, a tournament dedicated to Pyrrhus could o...

Ok, lets consider just the first one...do you find it extreme too?

I was talking generically about the use of impact + offensive spearmen in the same army. The three armies actually have these configurations (for medium size): APULIAN Veteran armoured cav / cost 60 / 2+ 0 to 6 Veteran italian foot / cost 66/ 0 to 3 Italian foot / cost 36 / 7 + 0 to 24 light jav / c...

In addition to what I wrote earlier, I am showing you some images of artifacts from the Italian cultural heritage catalog. These are artifacts found in Iapygian or Lucanian tombs, and they are by no means 'medium infantry' armor. They are not war spoils either, but armor and helmets used expecially ...

Are there any factions with hoplites + Samnite foot? Any/many with hoplites + impact foot? It usually goes one way or another. Samnite foot are identical to spanish Scutari. A lot of list has spanish Scutari with offensive spearmen. For example, the list you are using in WTC. Anyway I'm not getting...

As Richard may probably remember, in the past I have had the opportunity to provide you with information and suggestions about some pre-Roman peoples of southern Italy (in particular the Apulians), which were well-received and subsequently led to modifications in FoG. Recently, I had a similar oppor...

Hi

one of the 2 battle has just ended.

MrCrow (Galatian 280-63 BC) defeats principesromanes (Pyrrhic 280-275 BC) 56-24

The other one will require 2 more turns to end.