Search found 14 matches
- Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:33 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Dublin Viking List
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1906
Taking onboard what you've said, would the following be better. 3x TC (including CnC) plus Norse-Irish Ally TC 3x 6 Huscarls - HF, Sup, Und, Arm, HW with 3 Supp. Archers - LF, Sup, Und, Unprot, Bow 2x 8 Freemen - HF, Av, Und, Prot, Off Sp 2x 6 Freemen - HF, Av, Und, Prot, Off Sp 2x 6 Irish - MF, Av,...
- Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:20 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Dublin Viking List
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1906
Dublin Viking List
Hi, I have been working on a couple of Dublin Viking lists from WFTS. Appreciate some comment on how people think they would survive against all-comers. List 1 3x TC (including CnC) plus Norse-Irish Ally TC 4x 4 Huscarls - HF, Sup, Und, Arm, HW with 2 Supp. Archers - LF, Sup, Und, Unprot, Bow 4x 8 F...
- Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:27 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Commanders
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4402
Commanders
Hi, I've just started playing FOG and I am using an army that is almost totally comprised of drilled troops. My make-up has been one IC and two TCs. It has been suggested that it might be better to consider using 4 TCs as it will allow greater micro-control. Anybody want to share their wisdom regard...
- Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:19 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Mongol Captives?
- Replies: 39
- Views: 11035
- Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:26 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Mongol Captives?
- Replies: 39
- Views: 11035
- Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:14 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Braveheart First NZ FoG tournament
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1076
- Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:20 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Warring States Ch'in List 300-206BC
- Replies: 27
- Views: 10439
- Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:12 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Warring States Ch'in List 300-206BC
- Replies: 27
- Views: 10439
Iain, It was not an official list, just one I had drawn up in Word (using the info above), in a familiar format. I was keen to get some comment on it as I know the Warring States are a long way down the track. Given your approval above, here is a repost. Any comment appreciated http://img.photobucke...
- Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:46 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Warring States Ch'in List 300-206BC
- Replies: 27
- Views: 10439
Warring States Ch'in List 300-206BC
Hi, Looking at playing some games with a Ch'in Warring States list and I am aware that an official list is a long way off. Interested in getting some feedback on whether the following list is appropriate in the interim. ************************************* POST DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR IT IS ABSOLU...
- Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:52 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Cohesion Status Markers
- Replies: 25
- Views: 7855
- Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:59 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: ARMY LIST CALCULATOR
- Replies: 254
- Views: 197030
- Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:59 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Concern over MU for 25mm
- Replies: 43
- Views: 10758
Thanks for the reply but I think you might have missed the point. I would have thought you would have wanted to make your rules as easy as possible for the largest possible market....and I suspect Rest of the World 25mm is larger a market than UK 25mm. The problem is that players and TOs are stickle...
- Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:13 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Concern over MU for 25mm
- Replies: 43
- Views: 10758
I agree with Steve regarding the lack of a separate MU for 25/28mm. If 6' x 4' play is only the norm in the UK I would have thought that the potential in offshore markets more than justified the inclusion of a more, at worst, aesthetically pleasing 25mm MU. All it requires is a single line in the ru...
- Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Early Viking Troop Types
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1674
Early Viking Troop Types
Looking to run a game using an Early Period Viking Army
Are the following correct classifications for the major Troop types:
Huscarls - Heavy Foot, Impact Foot, Swordsmen, Armoured, Average, Undrilled
Raiders - Medium Foot, Impact Foot, Swordsman, Protected, Average, Undrilled
Thanks
Pete
Are the following correct classifications for the major Troop types:
Huscarls - Heavy Foot, Impact Foot, Swordsmen, Armoured, Average, Undrilled
Raiders - Medium Foot, Impact Foot, Swordsman, Protected, Average, Undrilled
Thanks
Pete