Taking onboard what you've said, would the following be better.
3x TC (including CnC) plus Norse-Irish Ally TC
3x 6 Huscarls - HF, Sup, Und, Arm, HW with 3 Supp. Archers - LF, Sup, Und, Unprot, Bow
2x 8 Freemen - HF, Av, Und, Prot, Off Sp
2x 6 Freemen - HF, Av, Und, Prot, Off Sp
2x 6 Irish - MF ...
Search found 14 matches
- Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:33 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Dublin Viking List
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2241
- Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:20 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Dublin Viking List
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2241
Dublin Viking List
Hi,
I have been working on a couple of Dublin Viking lists from WFTS. Appreciate some comment on how people think they would survive against all-comers.
List 1
3x TC (including CnC) plus Norse-Irish Ally TC
4x 4 Huscarls - HF, Sup, Und, Arm, HW with 2 Supp. Archers - LF, Sup, Und, Unprot, Bow ...
I have been working on a couple of Dublin Viking lists from WFTS. Appreciate some comment on how people think they would survive against all-comers.
List 1
3x TC (including CnC) plus Norse-Irish Ally TC
4x 4 Huscarls - HF, Sup, Und, Arm, HW with 2 Supp. Archers - LF, Sup, Und, Unprot, Bow ...
- Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:27 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Commanders
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4756
Commanders
Hi,
I've just started playing FOG and I am using an army that is almost totally comprised of drilled troops.
My make-up has been one IC and two TCs. It has been suggested that it might be better to consider using 4 TCs as it will allow greater micro-control.
Anybody want to share their wisdom ...
I've just started playing FOG and I am using an army that is almost totally comprised of drilled troops.
My make-up has been one IC and two TCs. It has been suggested that it might be better to consider using 4 TCs as it will allow greater micro-control.
Anybody want to share their wisdom ...
- Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:19 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Mongol Captives?
- Replies: 39
- Views: 12330
- Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:26 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Mongol Captives?
- Replies: 39
- Views: 12330
- Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:14 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Braveheart First NZ FoG tournament
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1181
- Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:20 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Warring States Ch'in List 300-206BC
- Replies: 27
- Views: 11276
- Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:12 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Warring States Ch'in List 300-206BC
- Replies: 27
- Views: 11276
- Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:46 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Warring States Ch'in List 300-206BC
- Replies: 27
- Views: 11276
Warring States Ch'in List 300-206BC
Hi,
Looking at playing some games with a Ch'in Warring States list and I am aware that an official list is a long way off. Interested in getting some feedback on whether the following list is appropriate in the interim.
*************************************
POST DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR
IT IS ...
Looking at playing some games with a Ch'in Warring States list and I am aware that an official list is a long way off. Interested in getting some feedback on whether the following list is appropriate in the interim.
*************************************
POST DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR
IT IS ...
- Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:52 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Cohesion Status Markers
- Replies: 25
- Views: 8677
The markers Sean has in his battle report photos are the ones I had made by Litko.
They have "Disrupted" on one side and "Fragmented" on the other. Because they are etched into plastic you can have different coloured lettering by running a crayon over them - allows one colour for "new" status, one ...
They have "Disrupted" on one side and "Fragmented" on the other. Because they are etched into plastic you can have different coloured lettering by running a crayon over them - allows one colour for "new" status, one ...
- Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:59 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: ARMY LIST CALCULATOR
- Replies: 252
- Views: 379245
- Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:59 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Concern over MU for 25mm
- Replies: 43
- Views: 12145
- Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:13 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Concern over MU for 25mm
- Replies: 43
- Views: 12145
I agree with Steve regarding the lack of a separate MU for 25/28mm.
If 6' x 4' play is only the norm in the UK I would have thought that the potential in offshore markets more than justified the inclusion of a more, at worst, aesthetically pleasing 25mm MU. All it requires is a single line in the ...
If 6' x 4' play is only the norm in the UK I would have thought that the potential in offshore markets more than justified the inclusion of a more, at worst, aesthetically pleasing 25mm MU. All it requires is a single line in the ...
- Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Early Viking Troop Types
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1880
Early Viking Troop Types
Looking to run a game using an Early Period Viking Army
Are the following correct classifications for the major Troop types:
Huscarls - Heavy Foot, Impact Foot, Swordsmen, Armoured, Average, Undrilled
Raiders - Medium Foot, Impact Foot, Swordsman, Protected, Average, Undrilled
Thanks
Pete
Are the following correct classifications for the major Troop types:
Huscarls - Heavy Foot, Impact Foot, Swordsmen, Armoured, Average, Undrilled
Raiders - Medium Foot, Impact Foot, Swordsman, Protected, Average, Undrilled
Thanks
Pete