Division E
KLT1963 (Galatians) defeated Barrold 713 (Kappadokians) by the (incredibly bloody) score of 63% to 52%
Search found 11 matches
- Tue Feb 20, 2018 4:26 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 2247448
- Tue Feb 20, 2018 4:23 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 2247448
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here
Division E
KLT 1963 (Pyrrhic) defeated 76mm (Lysimachids) 42% to 15%
KLT 1963 (Pyrrhic) defeated 76mm (Lysimachids) 42% to 15%
- Mon Jan 22, 2018 9:52 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Rough terrain with no Medium Infantry
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1505
Re: Rough terrain with no Medium Infantry
Yes. The earlier Galatian army is quite imposing. Later Galatian army, not so much....
- Mon Jan 22, 2018 9:24 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Rough terrain with no Medium Infantry
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1505
Re: Rough terrain with no Medium Infantry
Interesting insights Richard, thanks! To be perfectly honest, on first glance the Galatian army appears to be pretty ordinary. Impact Foot is good, but the Warbands are Average quality and have no Armor. I guess the size of the warbands also works well in grinding opponents down. Of course, I really...
- Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:56 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Rough terrain with no Medium Infantry
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1505
Re: Rough terrain with no Medium Infantry
Bummer........
So the question stands. Grin and bear it?
So the question stands. Grin and bear it?
- Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:24 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Rough terrain with no Medium Infantry
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1505
Re: Rough terrain with no Medium Infantry
Loose order warbands? I did not see them as an option in the selection menu. Or is it just a different formation for the warbands (like square for pikes)?
- Mon Jan 22, 2018 6:59 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Rough terrain with no Medium Infantry
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1505
Rough terrain with no Medium Infantry
I am playing Galatians (63BC to 25 BC). The battlefield consists almost exclusively of rough terrain. How do I fill out my army and what tactics do I pursue? For those who aren't familiar with the Late Antiquity Galatian army, it has a very limited menu of troops. There are two primary types of Heav...
- Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:49 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Please add yourself to this PLAYER LOCATION thread
- Replies: 351
- Views: 109693
Re: Please add yourself to this PLAYER LOCATION thread
76mm / Berlin, Germany AlessandroD / Augusta Taurinorum, Italy Alkahest / Bratislava, Slovakia Alsagoz / Chiang Mai, Thailand Amenofi64/Alba, Italy Barrold713/DeWitt, Michigan U.S.A. Brenmusik / Sussex-by-the-Sea, England Breogan / Vigo, Spain Cablenexus / Amsterdam, the Netherlands Canavan / Sidney...
- Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:06 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 2247448
Re: Recruitment for Classical Antiquity is now open!
1. Pyrrhic 280-272 BC
2. Roman 219-200 BC
3. Carthaginians 218-217 BC
2. Roman 219-200 BC
3. Carthaginians 218-217 BC
- Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:04 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 2247448
Re: Recruitment for Late Antiquity is now open!
1. Roman 105-25 BC
2. Galatian 63-25 BC
3. Gallic 100-50 BC
2. Galatian 63-25 BC
3. Gallic 100-50 BC
- Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:18 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Please add yourself to this PLAYER LOCATION thread
- Replies: 351
- Views: 109693
Re: Please add yourself to this PLAYER LOCATION thread
76mm / Berlin, Germany AlessandroD / Augusta Taurinorum, Italy Alkahest / Bratislava, Slovakia Alsagoz / Chiang Mai, Thailand Amenofi64/Alba, Italy Archaeologist1970/Pensacola,Florida Barrold713/DeWitt, Michigan U.S.A. Bluefin / Minneapolis, Minnesota USA BornGinger / Wales, UK Brenmusik / Sussex-by...