Division B
I have set up the following match:
Bagatrix1805 Free Canton 1200-1319 with german vs Swuul Scots (Isles and Highlanders) 1050-1319 with Norwegian 1155-1319
Password sent in PM
Search found 390 matches
- Fri Feb 06, 2026 6:54 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC IX Early Medieval - Challenges
- Replies: 47
- Views: 1801
- Tue Feb 03, 2026 5:07 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC IX Early Medieval - Challenges
- Replies: 47
- Views: 1801
Re: TDC IX Early Medieval - Challenges
I have set up a couple matches: Div B IMC English 1272-1319 AD with Welsh vs Swuul Scots (Isles and Highlanders) 1050-1319 with Norwegian 1155-1319 Password: sent w2512494748 Italian (Ghibelline) 1200-1319 w German vs Swuul Scots (Isles and Highlanders) 1050-1319 with Norwegian 1155-1319 Password: s...
- Fri Jan 16, 2026 1:45 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC IX Early Medieval - Challenges
- Replies: 47
- Views: 1801
Re: TDC IX Early Medieval - Challenges
Div B
cromlechi Danish 1200-1319 and German (Imperial) 1200-1390 vs Swuul Scots (Isles and Highlanders) 1050-1319 with Norwegian 1155-1319
Password sent
cromlechi Danish 1200-1319 and German (Imperial) 1200-1390 vs Swuul Scots (Isles and Highlanders) 1050-1319 with Norwegian 1155-1319
Password sent
- Fri Jan 16, 2026 1:18 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC IX Early Medieval - Challenges
- Replies: 47
- Views: 1801
Re: TDC IX Early Medieval - Challenges
Hiya mate, respectfully its not. You are set up as player A (as per TDC instructions) with the Scots so you can move straight to deployment when you accept the challenge. Any issues drop me a pm. Mike. My bad, sorry! I must have twisted my brain somehow when I was looking at it. Challenge accepted ...
- Wed Jan 14, 2026 7:36 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC IX Early Medieval - Challenges
- Replies: 47
- Views: 1801
- Thu Dec 11, 2025 2:57 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC IX Early Medieval 1038 AD – 1319 AD - Sign-ups - Closed
- Replies: 41
- Views: 2227
Re: TDC IX Early Medieval 1038 AD – 1319 AD - Sign-ups
Thank you Karvon for pinging me :) I haven't played FoG in good while, and I am a bit slower these days, but I think I should be able to handle enough games in three months. Please sign me up for 1038-1319. Armies to follow (I have to first see what kind of armies exist in this era :) ). EDIT: My ch...
- Tue Dec 09, 2025 1:53 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory: Empires
- Topic: Prospect for Resources
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2288
- Mon Sep 15, 2025 6:35 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Tournaments & Leagues
- Topic: HOML 9 Rules, questions, updates.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1088
Re: HOML 9 Rules, questions, updates.
Can "Field Fortifications" be used for armies that have them as an option?
- Sun Jan 29, 2023 8:33 am
- Forum: Field of Glory: Empires
- Topic: FIELD OF GLORY KINGDOMS
- Replies: 65
- Views: 18915
Re: FIELD OF GLORY KINGDOMS
If you live close to a University (anywhere in the world basically), ask them to print the PDF to book. Sturdy and affordable (especially if you take soft-cover with b&w picture; hard-cover with full colour pictures obviously costs more) because there are gazillions of poor students who need the...
- Sun Jan 29, 2023 8:20 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC - Archive
- Replies: 13347
- Views: 580815
Re: TDC III - Imperial - Challenges
Division C I have challenged: Morat Frankish 496-599 w Visigoth allies vs my Roman 197 and Arab allies Najanaja Ancient British 60BC – 80AD + Roman allies Hari72 Hephthalite 350 -570 AD PM (with password) sent to each. After next week I might be a bit slow with my turns for a few days, but after tha...
- Sun Jan 29, 2023 7:57 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC - Archive
- Replies: 13347
- Views: 580815
Re: TDC III - Imperial - Posting Results
Division C Swuul - 197-284 with Arab allies beats SawyerK Germanic Foot Tribes 260-599 AD with Roman allies 60:40 Screenshot of final positions: https://i.imgur.com/hML8HNv.jpg As the Germanics with Romans have a very strong cavalry supported by some tough as nails infantry, the pre-battle planning ...
- Tue Jan 24, 2023 7:39 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC - Archive
- Replies: 13347
- Views: 580815
Re: Field of Glory II - The Divisional Championships (TDC)-Rules
I am not sure if I am the only one with this issue, but I haven't been able to connect to the MP server since yesterday morning. I tried yesterday in the afternoon and in the evening, and the attempt timed out. Attempting to connect again (on my lunch-break at work), and seems to not be able to con...
- Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:02 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC - Archive
- Replies: 13347
- Views: 580815
Re: Field of Glory II - The Divisional Championships (TDC)-Rules
I am not sure if I am the only one with this issue, but I haven't been able to connect to the MP server since yesterday morning. I tried yesterday in the afternoon and in the evening, and the attempt timed out. Attempting to connect again (on my lunch-break at work), and seems to not be able to conn...
- Wed Jan 18, 2023 9:17 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC - Archive
- Replies: 13347
- Views: 580815
- Fri Jan 13, 2023 11:56 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC - Archive
- Replies: 13347
- Views: 580815
Re: TDC III - Imperial - Challenges
Division C
I have challenged
SawyerK (Germanic Foot Tribes 260-599 AD with Roman)
and
ulysisgrunt (Roman 379-424 with Hunnic Western)
Password and PM sent to both
I have challenged
SawyerK (Germanic Foot Tribes 260-599 AD with Roman)
and
ulysisgrunt (Roman 379-424 with Hunnic Western)
Password and PM sent to both
- Fri Jan 13, 2023 7:12 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC - Archive
- Replies: 13347
- Views: 580815
Re: TDC III - Imperial - Posting Results
Division C Swuul - 197-284 with Arab allies beats Bagatrix1805 - Dacian 89 AD-106 AD with Sarmatian allies 41:11 Screenshot of final positions: https://i.imgur.com/xCchSYn.jpg Pre-fight plan for Rome was to push hard in the center with the legions, before the hostile warbands would have time to poss...
- Wed Jan 11, 2023 1:52 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC - Archive
- Replies: 13347
- Views: 580815
Re: TDC III - Imperial - Posting Results
Division C Swuul - 197-284 with Arab allies beats gfs26 - Dacian 50 BC - 88 AD with Sarmation allies 41:15 Screenshot of final positions: https://i.imgur.com/50V3UMV.jpg Pre-fight plan for Rome was to hold center with veteran Legions, while the flanks would attempt to lure the enemy to close in, and...
- Sat Jan 07, 2023 10:58 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC - Archive
- Replies: 13347
- Views: 580815
Re: TDC III - Imperial - Challenges
Division C
I have challenged
Badger73 (Palmyran vs my Romans with Arab allies)
and
gfs26 (Dacians with Sarmatian allies vs my Roman 197 with Arab allies)
Password and PM sent to both
I have challenged
Badger73 (Palmyran vs my Romans with Arab allies)
and
gfs26 (Dacians with Sarmatian allies vs my Roman 197 with Arab allies)
Password and PM sent to both
- Sat Jan 07, 2023 10:46 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC - Archive
- Replies: 13347
- Views: 580815
Re: TDC III - Imperial - Challenges
This seems to be wrong.
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewto ... 09#p990109 lists Najanaja with Ancient British + Roman 24BC-196.
Probably because Ptolemaic 55-30 BC is an illegal army in the Imperial section.
- Mon Jan 02, 2023 2:18 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: The Divisional Championships
- Topic: TDC - Archive
- Replies: 13347
- Views: 580815
Re: TDC III - Imperial 25 BC – 600 AD - Posting entries and army choices - Full - Reserves slots only
Question.
Why is Ironclad with ELO rating 1000 placed at #9 while oscarius with ELO rating 1619 placed at #25? Are either their ELO ratings vice-versa, or are their positions in the table vice-versa, or is there some other stuff going on which only admins would understand?
Why is Ironclad with ELO rating 1000 placed at #9 while oscarius with ELO rating 1619 placed at #25? Are either their ELO ratings vice-versa, or are their positions in the table vice-versa, or is there some other stuff going on which only admins would understand?