2x60 units: That means quite a low unit density altogether, compared with your huge map. So every single unit destroyed will be a big pain. Plus: Not many options for players to build Schwerpunkte or reserves, when units just are sufficent to hold the front line. So the repertoire of command options...

Hex based naval is a bad mistake IMO for this scale - unless there's a radical new system in the works it simply doesn't reflect naval warfare properly - it's a failure in SC2 for example. Yep, I think so too. But for other reasons: With a map of this scale, hex-based naval and air war, will result...

Thanx for answering so fast

regards

As far I read, units will be corps sized tank-, infantry etc. land units, fighter, bomber air units. What about sea units? Do they represent multi class vessel fleets? (Cruiser, destroyer etc ) squadrons? Is there any chance that the units will be formed out of strength points? Or even better: Divis...

Next question:

What about air war:

will it be

zone based?

hex based?
(where I have to move around the units)

range based?
(Where I point out the targets for strat/tactical bombing and the air2air combat is abstracted, like in War in the Pacific, The operational Art of war)

regards

next question:

will the sea war be zone-/box- or hex based?

First would be like in clash of steel, World in Flames: Sea boxes represent left-over movement/action capacity (WIF) or combat stance (COS)
2nd one would be like in War in the pacific.

Regards

Next question:

How will the damage/casuality model be handeld?

Do the corps sized units get damage points? Or is the option: destroyed/intact units?

Is there a difference for damaged land-, sea-, air units?

regards

Hi,
first visit to this forum.

Game Idea sounds intresting (although I'd perfer a WW2 Staretgy game as global game, with PTO, China ...)

Esp. i like it to be turn based and not RT.

How long a turn will be in-game. Does it represent 1 week? 1 month? 1 abstract time length?

Regards