This may have been covered but the search function keeps timing out, and it's also possible that it will be clarified/changed in 2nd edition, but...
On page 54, in the 'Result of firing' table, the result for 1 or 2 hits is split, with one saying 'CMT to advance' and the other 'Cavalry and any ...
Search found 12 matches
- Mon Dec 31, 2018 6:31 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Hits from firing
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8816
- Tue May 22, 2018 11:05 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Routers & pursuers
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3788
Re: Routers & pursuers
Life's just one long learning experience sometimes 
- Tue May 22, 2018 11:03 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Breaking off in the JAP
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2147
Re: Breaking off in the JAP
Thanks Dave
That's what we were doing based on the general comment at the start of the 'Breaking off' section on page 106, but, in all fairness, that isn't explicitly covered in the actual rules, and someone used to FOGR may put a different interpretation on it
But now we've been guided we'll ...
That's what we were doing based on the general comment at the start of the 'Breaking off' section on page 106, but, in all fairness, that isn't explicitly covered in the actual rules, and someone used to FOGR may put a different interpretation on it
But now we've been guided we'll ...
- Tue May 22, 2018 10:58 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Autobreak
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3184
Re: Autobreak
Hi Christopher
Thanks once again for the clarifications, particularly that units rout in the JAP even if they've already made an initial rout move - I think we've been using the FOGR mechanic which, from memory, is that you only rout in the JAP if you haven't already made an initial rout move in an ...
Thanks once again for the clarifications, particularly that units rout in the JAP even if they've already made an initial rout move - I think we've been using the FOGR mechanic which, from memory, is that you only rout in the JAP if you haven't already made an initial rout move in an ...
- Mon May 21, 2018 7:43 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Routers & pursuers
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3788
Re: Routers & pursuers
Hi Dave, thanks once again
At the risk of going on ad nauseum about routers, the 'no VMD roll' and 2 base width slide appears in the first bullet point on page 108 which seems to continue the last bullet point on page 107 which specifies 'not in contact with enemy' whereas the second bullet point on ...
At the risk of going on ad nauseum about routers, the 'no VMD roll' and 2 base width slide appears in the first bullet point on page 108 which seems to continue the last bullet point on page 107 which specifies 'not in contact with enemy' whereas the second bullet point on ...
- Mon May 21, 2018 11:35 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Breaking off in the JAP
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2147
Breaking off in the JAP
I think I may have been misreading this...
Page 106, Breaking off, second paragraph, bullet points three scenarios where units cannot break off and then goes on to say that mounted troops must break off against 50%+ formed foot
Does this mean that every type of unit not proscribed by the three ...
Page 106, Breaking off, second paragraph, bullet points three scenarios where units cannot break off and then goes on to say that mounted troops must break off against 50%+ formed foot
Does this mean that every type of unit not proscribed by the three ...
- Mon May 21, 2018 11:14 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Autobreak
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3184
Re: Autobreak
Hi Christopher
Thanks for coming back
The JAP doesn't actually refer to autobreaks, only 'BGs that are broken and at of below 50% original strength' (which is going to cover average and poor but not necessarily superior/elite for autobreak purposes) - in this instance I'd read 'broken' as 'routing ...
Thanks for coming back
The JAP doesn't actually refer to autobreaks, only 'BGs that are broken and at of below 50% original strength' (which is going to cover average and poor but not necessarily superior/elite for autobreak purposes) - in this instance I'd read 'broken' as 'routing ...
- Mon May 21, 2018 8:59 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Autobreak
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3184
Autobreak
Autobreak on page 116 says that battle groups which have reached their autobreak level are removed from play
If a unit autobreaks whilst in base contact with an enemy unit should it make a rout move first? And if so, and the enemy unit remains in contact, is the autobroken unit still removed or ...
If a unit autobreaks whilst in base contact with an enemy unit should it make a rout move first? And if so, and the enemy unit remains in contact, is the autobroken unit still removed or ...
- Mon May 21, 2018 8:43 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Routers & pursuers
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3788
Re: Routers & pursuers
Hi Dave and thanks for the clarifications
Looking at point 1, on page 108, second bullet point says 'Broken troops in contact with the enemy at the start of this phase move again using the same rules as for their initial rout move:', which is where my confusion arose
For point 2, just to close it ...
Looking at point 1, on page 108, second bullet point says 'Broken troops in contact with the enemy at the start of this phase move again using the same rules as for their initial rout move:', which is where my confusion arose
For point 2, just to close it ...
- Sun May 20, 2018 8:27 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Routers & pursuers
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3788
Routers & pursuers
Couple of questions if someone could oblige...
1. Routers broken on contact in the impact phase: in their initial rout phase routers move directly away from units in base contact. As the phasing player conforming to enemy groups in contact comes in the movement phase does the broken unit conform to ...
1. Routers broken on contact in the impact phase: in their initial rout phase routers move directly away from units in base contact. As the phasing player conforming to enemy groups in contact comes in the movement phase does the broken unit conform to ...
- Sun Aug 28, 2016 4:36 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: BG firing long and short range
- Replies: 8
- Views: 14899
Re: BG firing long and short range
Thanks for clarifying - we'd figured it was firing by file but it's always nice to have it confirmed
- Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:39 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: BG firing long and short range
- Replies: 8
- Views: 14899
Re: BG firing long and short range
OK, so slightly different situation:
EEEE EEEE
MPM
E:enemy base; M: Musket; P:Pike
Left hand enemy BG is just to the left of the pike, right hand enemy BG just to the right of the pike. Both enemy BG just inside short range
Left hand BG is out of arc for right hand muskets because it is within ...
EEEE EEEE
MPM
E:enemy base; M: Musket; P:Pike
Left hand enemy BG is just to the left of the pike, right hand enemy BG just to the right of the pike. Both enemy BG just inside short range
Left hand BG is out of arc for right hand muskets because it is within ...