I am very glad to see the responses generated by my request to see some kind of official clarifications on a number of points. Simplicity is always preferable to undue complication. It is in the spirit of simplicity that I made my request for some clarifications and offered myideas . Regarding Threa...

Both the desicion as to whether or not to allow rear support from a battle group that is askew and the threatened flank example are from real games. Neither of these things are particularly rare. Another example,(this one hypothetical, I admit ):Should rear support be granted for a BG that has a fri...

philqw78 did a nice job hi-lighting a few of the "less than clear" points in the rules. Here are another couple of areas which could use clarification; Rear Support- is it really the author's intent to allow rear support from a unit within 8 or 12 (mounted) MUs which is turned at 90 degree...

I am hoping to see some "official" clarifications on some points and perhaps some fleshing out on others, by RBS ,on such points as "kinked" columns, threatened flanks,shooting in cover,simple moves to avoid enemy within 12 inches versus "complex" moves,and official cla...