Right, couldn't be clearer. So the original premise is true? If possible, the chargers could wheel the minimum necessary to dink the evaders with its front corner?

I don't see anything governing how or when the chargers can wheel - so I believe you're free to wheel as you wish. However, I don't think the elephants could contact the LH simply with their front corner - don't they have to make 'legal' contact with their front edge against either the rear edge or ...

On page 58 it says "they do not test (and will not charge) if the friends are shock troops or already in melee". I'm wondering about the "and will not charge" clause. To me it seems to suggest that even if they have failed their test, friends getting in the way so completely tha...

Page 68: "...if there is more than one charge, the active player chooses the order in which they are actioned." Page 58: "...if they could not contact the enemy without passing through friends....They do not test (and will not charge) if the friends are shock troops or already in mel...

The rules state that shock troops must test to not charge enemy within charge range. It doesn't seem to qualify this with the target having to be directly ahead of the shock troops. Thus, one could bring up skirmishers off to the side of shock troops and force them to either pass a CMT or else wheel...

How about the situation on p. 167 with the Roman legion? To recap, 5 disrupted bases are fighting in 3 groups of 2, 2 and 1 base respectively, for 4, 4, and 2 dice before losing dice due to disruption. Losing 1 per 3, they will lose 3 dice. What are the legal combinations of dice they can fight with...

Somehow I've gotten obsessed with the mechanism for apportioning dice lost due to disruption, fragmentation, etc... Rather than seek counseling, I've decided it would be cheaper to simply discuss it with the group. Hi, my name is Francis, and I'm a Rules Lawyer... OK, here's the situation: your disr...