Clarification on Evading please
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 12:05 pm
During one of my games at Warfare, a 2 base wide, 4 BG of LH had to evade.
Directly in its path were 2 BGs of Cav. These were separated by about 50mm, so there was more than an element wide gap.
I proposed that I could shift one of the LH elements (less than a base width shift) so that it was lined up on the gap, whilst the other bases fell in behind it. So no individual base shifted by more than a base width. My opponent disagreed and as time was moving on and both umpire/authors were hotly engaged in their own games I didn't press the point.
The outcome was that my LH evaded straight back with no shift or contraction and burst through both BGs of Cav, disrupting them both.
Was this correct or should I have been permitted to shift and contract? Sorry I'm not clever enough to provide a diagram but hope my explanation is clear.
Cheers,
Pete
Directly in its path were 2 BGs of Cav. These were separated by about 50mm, so there was more than an element wide gap.
I proposed that I could shift one of the LH elements (less than a base width shift) so that it was lined up on the gap, whilst the other bases fell in behind it. So no individual base shifted by more than a base width. My opponent disagreed and as time was moving on and both umpire/authors were hotly engaged in their own games I didn't press the point.
The outcome was that my LH evaded straight back with no shift or contraction and burst through both BGs of Cav, disrupting them both.
Was this correct or should I have been permitted to shift and contract? Sorry I'm not clever enough to provide a diagram but hope my explanation is clear.
Cheers,
Pete