Page 1 of 1

Inabilaty to melee?

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:48 am
by Terrement
I've played a few scenarios where, for example, I have cav who are in command, neither disrupted nor fragmented, and the system will not permit me to attack units that are within range. Yet when I play the other side in the scenario, the AI has no problem doing what I could not.

Don't remember the scenario I played today (on a different computer) but it is the one early in the list, small number of units where the Romans come out to break a siege, with, IIRC, 4 skirmishing infantry and 3 or 4 cav.

Not sure what I'm missing...any ideas?

JJ

Re: Inabilaty to melee?

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:09 am
by philqw78
The correct forum would be an idea.

We have toy soldiers not computers.

Re: Inabilaty to melee?

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:39 am
by Terrement
That's proof of why you are a Field Marshal and I am but a Lance Corporal. My apologies and thanks.

JJ

Re: Inabilaty to melee?

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:54 pm
by hazelbark
You are reading the wrong part of his avatar.

Note gig open mouth of.....cannon.

Title "Gust" av wind.

:lol:

Re: Inabilaty to melee?

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 6:07 am
by philqw78
F off big nose

Re: Inabilaty to melee?

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 2:19 pm
by hazelbark
Is this meant as a Monty Python joke or an avatar reference.

:lol: