Page 1 of 1
Tibetan question
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:07 pm
by bahdahbum
The tibetan may have allies but the price you pay for the ALLY general is the same as for a "regular" general ( see nepalese ally ) . So I suppose that that particular "ally" general act as a "normal" general for your army and that all generals influence the "ally" . So it is not a real ally but a sub state army included in your main army .
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:04 pm
by Scrumpy
Suspect it is a typo.
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:43 pm
by bahdahbum
Still there is no errata about it . If you pay the full price it is included in the army ...
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:57 pm
by nikgaukroger
It is, of course, obviously an error in the points that will need to be included in a future errata update. If there is a thread for possible errata can you pop this in there, or if there sin't start one so it doesn't get lost. (Add in any others that may have been identified since the last errata update as they may have been missed)
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:58 pm
by hazelbark
nikgaukroger wrote:It is, of course, obviously an error in the points that will need to be included in a future errata update. If there is a thread for possible errata can you pop this in there, or if there sin't start one so it doesn't get lost. (Add in any others that may have been identified since the last errata update as they may have been missed)
Well there are a ton in the rules section.

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:13 pm
by grahambriggs
Ma y I be the first to say that this is anNepali error?
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:02 pm
by Lycanthropic
No