Page 1 of 1

Charge target

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:29 pm
by madcam2us
(a 4x2BG) is in melee to its front with an enemy BG - 2. Off to one side is an enemy BG - 1 that wishes to charge the engaged BG.


_________22__
1111_____22__
_________aaaa
_________aaaa

BG 1 doesn't qualify for a flank vs BG(a)

Can the rear element -(a) be the target of the charge? Why or why not with page references....

thanks...

My take is no and was played as such due to pages 92 and pages 53

thanks.

Madcam.

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:10 am
by fatismo
My understanding is that if a base is contributing dice to a combat to its front it can't be charged (except flank/rear). Therefore you can charge an overlap, or a base not giving dice eg third/fourth rank of a BG (pike or spear backed by LF bow spring to mind or a unit in column maybe).

This is considered a frontal charge therefore when you conform you slid in beside BG 1. Also if it's pike I'm pretty sure they still get all there factors for 4 ranks deep even though you are hitting the third or fourth rank.

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:14 am
by marioslaz
See p. 57 last bullet. You can hit the flank of the rear base of BG 'a'. You fight an impact only 1 base vs 1 base, than BG '1' align as an overlap if there is room. BG 'a' never count as hit in flank, nor as fighting in 2 directions. If BG 'a' was in one rank only, you cannot do so and you can charge only if you can make a legal flank charge.

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:45 am
by dave_r
See p. 57 last bullet. You can hit the flank of the rear base of BG 'a'. You fight an impact only 1 base vs 1 base, than BG '1' align as an overlap if there is room. BG 'a' never count as hit in flank, nor as fighting in 2 directions. If BG 'a' was in one rank only, you cannot do so and you can charge only if you can make a legal flank charge.
That is incorrect. Since the second rank base adds dice to the combat it is "in melee", meaning that it cannot be charged. Madcam's initial page postings are correct - page 53 states "A charge cannot be declared if it would contact only the flank or rear edge of an enemy base which is already in melee to its front, except by a "legal" flank or rear charge."

Page 92 goes onto state "Rear ranks of an eligible troop type can fight if they belong to the same battle group as the front rank or overlap they are behind"

Therefore the front two rank's are in melee. Note third ranks are not (even if adding a tactical factor as pikes) since they are not behind a front rank base.

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:06 am
by philqw78
From the FAQ
FAQ wrote:Which enemy ranks cannot be so contacted if the front base in the file is already in melee to its front?
The first two ranks.

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:40 pm
by petedalby
It is nailed as Phil says in the FAQ.

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:26 pm
by madcam2us
Yes, indeed it is.

You'd think Mike Hart would have read it....

madcam.

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:23 am
by mhohio
Hmmm.... U would definately think I would... but since we did not have the FAQ handy at the time....

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 1:33 am
by hazelbark
mhohio wrote:Hmmm.... U would definately think I would... but since we did not have the FAQ handy at the time....
Heck its surprising you guys even had the rules.

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:13 am
by kal5056
hazelbark wrote:
mhohio wrote:Hmmm.... U would definately think I would... but since we did not have the FAQ handy at the time....
Heck its surprising you guys even had the rules.

Or could agree to play by them.
Gino
SMAC

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:05 am
by hazelbark
kal5056 wrote:
hazelbark wrote:
mhohio wrote:Hmmm.... U would definately think I would... but since we did not have the FAQ handy at the time....
Heck its surprising you guys even had the rules.

Or could agree to play by them.
Gino
SMAC
Well apparently they can't "agree"