Imeror wrote: ↑Sun Oct 19, 2025 10:40 pm
bondjamesbond wrote: ↑Sun Oct 19, 2025 9:50 pm
Just for the sake of experiment, I started playing through the Russian campaign from the first chapter. So as not to clutter this up with pictures, I just recorded the replay. I completed all three missions in the first chapter with a decisive victory. In Chapter 2 in Ukraine, I started well but still didn't make it to move 22 because I lost my pace and speed as the Ukrainian troops resisted, finishing at move 30. Now, on the second map of Chapter 2 in Kiev, we will try to defeat the ghost of Kiev. To be continued. And my veterans are still fighting on old equipment that belongs in a museum. Yes, you don't take prestige into account because there isn't enough of it, and as we know, decisive victories give less prestige than indecisive ones.
https://www.deepl.com/ru/translator
You should delay this playthrought by around a week, I think.
I'm also playing all of them again to adjust the prestige points given to the player.
Chapter 2 will have a lot of changes.
The dificulty on a whole will be reduced, especially the Kyiv scenario. I'm removing some ennemy units, give more reinforcements to the player, add more core slots, etc...
And I also make more aesthetics improvements, like allow the presentation screen to show the objectives, finish to put MC city tiles in Kyiv, etc...
If I remind well, it was my first campaign (before, the other were just map packs). I was afraid for a long time that players could send hordes of T-72 if I give too much ; and I finished to give practically nothing. It was time to fix this chapter !
In chapter 3, players will have a better income and Niamey mission will be rebalanced (in the same spirit than Kyiv) ; but nothing more. This chapter was make hard mainly due to the previous chapter that could destroy a player core without giving enough points to expand, or simply, rebuild it.
But I have nothing to change to chapter 1. This one is in its final version.
bondjamesbond wrote: ↑Sun Oct 19, 2025 9:50 pm
To be continued. And my veterans are still fighting on old equipment that belongs in a museum.
That will not be changed.
Why ? Gameplay reasons, feeling of progress with better equipment, etc...
I decided to re-use the gameplay logic behind the army progression that the campaigns of the main mod : the US start with Pattons, France with AMX-30s, etc...
I have find a justification for the old equipment in the chapter in Syria (a potential "pre-sale" demonstration) ; but I have indeed not justified it in the part in Ukraine.
Despite your success in Syria, you are still the "rookie" general around. Maybe older and (still) more prestigious generals in charge of other fronts demanded that all the new shiny equipments go to their armies in priority, leaving you with what remain.
But don't worry, more modern T-72s will soon roll free in Eastern Europe under your banner. After 3 success in Syria, Ukraine, and Sahel, your superiors should understand they can give you the best equipment they have, and that you will make good use of them.
By the way, don't worry : every factions in my campaigns start with some "museum" equipment, Russia is not the only one
PS : Your replay contain all your playthrough until Kyiv ? I will certainly download it tomorrow, to check how many points have a player at the start of Chapter 2.
There's 1600 prestige there. I'm not against old technology, but sometimes you have to give players something new, like Toby does with bonuses or for completing secondary tasks. Yes, when you created it, you weren't very experienced as a mapmaker, but now you're a real pro and it's time to polish your work. I also understand that it's very difficult to combine conventions and game balance without straying from realism. I know you can do it, and the replay will be another look and test.

I couldn't resist, and I was right—the ghost of Kiev fell into my trap. I hope that after your refinement, he will become wiser and more cautious.
I'll probably finish the second chapter, but you guys watch the replay to change the AI's tactics and strategy.

It would be good to give prestige for complete destruction or replenishment for holding bridges on which the Ukrainians are attacking )))) Their counter attack is very exhausting and reduces the pace of the offensive )
How will Flight 1 fly to the summit in Hungary?
For reference. Il-96-300PU is a highly protected platform with an echeloned defence system: all sorts of MAWS, lasers, DIRCM infrared jammers, heat traps, REB, armour, redundancy. Also inside the "nuclear button", and next to it - an escort of fighters and Il-22PP "Porubshchik", repeater planes, etc. In short - the most protected in non-combat conditions.
There are three routes of Air Force One, each of which is a whole geopolitical construct.
The main and safest one is the southern one: Moscow - Sochi - Black Sea along Turkey - Istanbul - Bulgaria or Greece (bypassing NATO zones) - Serbia - Budapest. Erdogan remembers who saved him, Serbia is an ally and Hungary guarantees immunity. The escort in flight is the Russian Air Force, over the sea the Turkish Air Force, over the Balkans the Serbian and Hungarian Air Forces. Separately discussed is a "combat umbrella" from the US Air Force. This is extraordinary, but Putin has already been escorted by F-22s near Alaska.
The second (northern) - through Belarus and Poland is very assertive and maximally dangerous. A dense zone of NATO air defences, air force, a bunch of Ukrainians and psychotic politicians. Yes, Batya's falcons will cover up to the western border, and Iskanders will take Poland in their nuclear crosshairs - but the risks are comparable to flying through a thunderstorm front.
The third, extended southern route: Moscow - Caspian Sea - Azerbaijan - Ankara - Serbia - Hungary. It is longer, but takes the route completely out of direct NATO control. Escorts - Azerbaijani Air Force, Turks, Serbs, Hungarians. A kind of insurance option.
The risk of a direct attack is minimal, but there are plenty of ‘grey scenarios’ and threats. The SBU, GUR and the AFU will do their best, but the main thing is that the British, who have repeatedly planned ‘incidents’ with unwanted leaders, are in play. Although everyone understands that any recognised attack on a state aircraft with the president on board is a casus belli without reservations. Forcing to land, interception, and even being escorted by NATO air defence is an act of aggression. Any emergency is enough to set half the world on fire.
In any case, we are waiting for a picture with escorts and a beautiful game with false departure windows, reserve aircraft; controlled leaks to disorient OSINT, etc.